Gabbard threatens prosecution against Obama administration officials for ‘treasonous conspiracy’

#DNI #TulsiGabbard #Obama

Well, now we know Obama concocted and directed the fake Russia Collusion scam. No wonder he stayed in Washington after office.

What is sad is that the country had to go through years or BS because the Clinton campaign paid for the FAKE Steele Dossier that the stupid half of America believed. You have Garandparents who supported Trump that can't see their Grandkids because the stupid Kids won't let the Grandparents see the Grandkids because the Kids believed Trump was a Russian asset. Trump spent 3 years battling a fake narrative. The media was ready to go to war with Russia. Thank God Kamala lost ... and lost big.

Democrats treat policy like a game. They do not care about the serious fallout. You don't Play with a nuclear power, especially when they have more nukes than you. Also, people lost jobs and careers over a lie made up by Obama. He may not be able to be tried for Treason, but he can be CIVILLY sued in Federal Court by anyone innocently harmed by a fake Intel report he directed. He was informed on at least 2 occasions/reports that said Russia did NOT affect the vote count. He didn't like that so he called 'The Band' together and directed them to push a different narrative/report. The declassified documents say so, so they can't deny it. They will. They are. And they're calling Lawyers right now to see what their legal issues are RIGHT NOW.

Jake Sullivan was the member of the Clinton campaign that Tweeted Russia and Trump colluded. He became Biden's National Security Advisor. So the Russians didn't want to talk to a Liar. Antony Blinken was Biden’s Secretary of State. He is the one that had 51 former Intel officials sign a letter that said the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian disinformation. The Russians didn't want to talk to him either because he was a Liar too. Biden didn't talk to Russia for 3 and a half years. They didn't talk to Biden because they knew he wasn't in charge. They weren't gonna give Kamala Harris the time of day because she was clueless. So, for the childplay and incompetent Democrat Party our relationship with Russia has been stagnant for the last 8 years. Like I said before, Democrats walk through crap then when they walk into the room they blame others for the stink they brought in.

Russia has tried to influence US politics since the beginning of the cold War. That is what they do. Only when Democrats lose an election it seems to matter.

In the meantime they should add 3 more years to Trump’s current term to make up for the lost time and energy spent during the first term.

Beans and Rice and The El Salvadore Prison

 

Beans and Rice 

The El Salvadore Prison Menu

'BTW, the Warden of that prison in El Salvador said all they get are beans and rice. He went on to say "When every citizen of El Salvador can afford meat then they can get meat".'

The Independent and Opposing Opinion

That statement from the El Salvadoran prison warden reflects a deliberately harsh and symbolic approach to incarceration, tied closely to the government's broader "tough on crime" stance. Here's a breakdown of its implications:

1.  Intentional Austerity: Providing only beans and rice is a policy choice designed to be punitive and minimal, far below nutritional standards seen in many prison systems. It signals that prisoners have forfeited comforts due to their crimes.

2.  Political Messaging: The warden's justification ("When every citizen... can afford meat") frames prison conditions as a matter of national solidarity and prioritization. It argues:

    Law-abiding citizens come first: Resources should prioritize innocent citizens struggling with poverty before "rewarding" criminals.

    Reflecting National Reality: Prisoners shouldn't live better than the poorest free citizens. It positions the prison system as sharing the nation's hardships.

    Shifting Responsibility: It implicitly deflects criticism about prison conditions by linking them to the country's broader economic challenges.

3.  Criticisms and Concerns:

    Basic Human Dignity: Denying adequate nutrition, even to prisoners, is seen by many as a violation of fundamental human rights and dignity. Beans and rice alone lack essential nutrients for long-term health.

    Punishment vs. Rehabilitation: This approach focuses solely on punishment and humiliation, offering nothing towards rehabilitation or reducing recidivism.

    Logical Flaw: The condition ("when every citizen can afford meat") is an impossibly high bar. Poverty is complex; achieving universal meat affordability is unrealistic in the near or medium term, meaning this policy could effectively condemn prisoners to permanent malnutrition.

    Health Consequences: Sustained protein and vitamin deficiencies lead to serious health problems (muscle wasting, weakened immunity, anemia), creating a future public health burden.

    International Standards: This policy likely violates the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), which stipulate adequate nutrition.

4.  Context of El Salvador: This statement occurs amidst President Nayib Bukele's massive crackdown on gangs. Prisons are severely overcrowded (holding over 100,000 inmates), and reports of widespread human rights abuses (including deaths in custody) are common. The "beans and rice" policy is part of a broader strategy to project an image of extreme control and zero tolerance.

In essence: The warden's statement is a stark articulation of a philosophy that prioritizes harsh retribution over rehabilitation or basic welfare for prisoners. It uses national economic hardship as a justification for imposing intentionally substandard conditions, framing it as a matter of justice and solidarity with the poor. While politically resonant with many Salvadorans weary of gang violence, it raises significant ethical and human rights concerns regarding the treatment of incarcerated individuals.

#Food #Beans #Rice #BeansAndRice #Diet #Nutrition #Cecot #ElSalvador

Black Beans and Rice

Cecot

(Centre for the Confinement of Terrorism)

Coming face to face with inmates in El Salvador's mega-jail

The ‘Leather-Bound’ Epstein Book Reeks Of Being A Fake Plant To Implicate Trump

President Trump’s claim that some of the Epstein files are ‘made up’ by Democrats and the FBI makes a lot more sense now.

#Trump #Epstein

Riley Gaines swims to shore from Alcatraz with 'most impressive Navy Seals'

Riley Gaines swims to shore from Alcatraz with 'most impressive Navy Seals'

She Is 31 Weeks  Pregnant! "You Go Girl!"

#Alcatraz #RileyGaines 

Zohran Mamdani

 

 Zohran Mamdani

Deep Dive

Intersectional Communist Zohran Mamdani Shows Democrats Can't Quit Obamaism | Opinion

Zohran Mamdani butters up Dems, while receipts with anti-establishment views resurface

Zohran Mamdani tells NYC business leaders he will discourage use of 'globalize the Intifada'

Antifada - A Call Of Violence Against Jews - He Won't Deny It

"Intifada" is an Arabic word meaning "uprising" or "shaking off." In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it refers to periods of Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation. The term is most often associated with two major uprisings: the First Intifada (1987-1993) and the Second Intifada (2000-2005). 

INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Zohran Mamdani: The Polished Radical Bridging Theory and Praxis in Queens

Zohran Mamdani isn't your stereotypical image of a New York State legislator. He’s a Rhodes Scholar with a master's from Oxford, the son of globally renowned academics, fluent and articulate, yet he represents Queens' 36th Assembly District not as a centrist Democrat, but as a self-proclaimed socialist with views firmly rooted in anti-capitalist and Marxist analysis. Labeling him simplistically as a "Communist" often misses the nuance of his ideology and the driving forces behind it. To understand who Mamdani "really is" and why he holds these views requires delving into his unique background, intellectual inheritance, lived experiences, and the specific political moment that propelled him into office.

Who He Is: A Tapestry of Heritage, Privilege, and Radicalization

1.  The Weight of Legacy: Born in 1991, Mamdani is the son of Mahmood Mamdani, the eminent Ugandan-Tanzanian-Indian political scientist and anthropologist known for works like "Good Muslim, Bad Muslim" and "Citizen and Subject," and Mira Nair, the acclaimed Indian filmmaker ("Monsoon Wedding," "Salaam Bombay!"). This upbringing immersed him in critical discussions about colonialism, imperialism, race, class, and power from a global perspective. Dinner table conversations likely dissected the very structures Mamdani now seeks to dismantle politically. This wasn't just academic; it was personal history. His father's family faced expulsion from Uganda under Idi Amin, a stark lesson in state violence and displacement.

2.  Elite Education and Its Discontents: Mamdani attended the prestigious Horace Mann School in the Bronx before heading to Columbia University and then Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. This trajectory placed him firmly within elite institutions. However, rather than simply assimilating, these experiences seem to have sharpened his critique. Studying political science and economics at such rarified levels likely provided him with the theoretical tools to dissect systemic inequalities with academic rigor, while simultaneously exposing him to the mechanisms that perpetuate them. The disconnect between the polished halls of academia and the struggles of ordinary people became increasingly apparent to him.

3.  The Crucible of Queens: Crucially, Mamdani didn't retreat into the ivory tower. He moved to Astoria, Queens, and became a housing counselor at the non-profit Chhaya CDC, focusing on South Asian and Indo-Caribbean communities. This was transformative. Here, theory met concrete reality. He witnessed firsthand the devastating impacts of New York City's housing crisis – predatory landlords, rampant displacement, the human cost of eviction, and the systemic failures that allowed it to flourish. He wasn't just reading about exploitation; he was helping its victims navigate a rigged system daily. This direct engagement with the brutal realities of late-stage capitalism on immigrant and working-class New Yorkers fundamentally radicalized his perspective.

The Genesis of Socialist (Not Strictly "Communist") Views:

Labeling Mamdani a "Communist" in the classical, 20th-century sense (implying strict adherence to a vanguard party, centrally planned economy, and perhaps uncritical alignment with historical socialist states) is imprecise. He identifies as a socialist, specifically within the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) framework, which emphasizes democratic control of the economy, radical redistribution, and building power through electoral politics and mass movements. His views stem from several interconnected sources:

1.  Systemic Analysis Inherited and Honed: From his father's work on the violent legacies of colonialism and the construction of racial and ethnic identities to his own studies, Mamdani views capitalism not as a neutral economic system, but as intrinsically linked to imperialism, racism, and exploitation. He sees poverty, inequality, the housing crisis, and climate change not as isolated failures but as necessary outcomes of a system prioritizing profit over people. Marxist analysis provides the primary lens through which he diagnoses these interconnected ills. The "Communist" label often applied stems from this foundational anti-capitalism and class analysis.

2.  Lived Experience of Injustice in Queens: His years at Chhaya were not just a job; they were an immersion in the consequences of the system he critiques. He saw how:

    Capital commodifies basic needs: Housing became a speculative asset, not a human right, leading to displacement and homelessness.

    Racial capitalism operates: Immigrant communities, particularly working-class South Asian and Indo-Caribbean families, were disproportionately targeted and exploited by predatory landlords and financial institutions.

    The state often sides with capital Tenant protections were weak, enforcement lax, and the political establishment frequently aligned with real estate interests.

    This daily confrontation with exploitation cemented his belief that tinkering around the edges (liberal reformism) was insufficient. Fundamental systemic change was necessary.

3.  The Failures of Liberalism and the Rise of the New Left: Coming of age politically during the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the Occupy movement, the rise of Bernie Sanders, and the visible fractures within the Democratic Party, Mamdani saw the limitations of mainstream liberalism. He witnessed it bailing out banks while leaving homeowners to drown, pursuing endless wars, and failing to address deepening inequality or the existential threat of climate change. The DSA's resurgence offered a vehicle for a more radical, uncompromising vision grounded in working-class power and anti-imperialism that resonated with his analysis and experiences.

Mamdani in Office: Socialist Praxis, Not Dogma

Since his upset victory in 2020 (defeating a long-term incumbent), Mamdani has demonstrated what his socialist politics look like in practice, focusing relentlessly on material needs and challenging power:

1.  Housing as a Frontline Issue: Drawing directly on his Chhaya experience, he's been a fierce advocate for tenants. He championed the Housing Access Voucher Program (HAVP), fought for stronger eviction protections, and relentlessly targets the power of the real estate lobby. He views housing justice as central to the class struggle in NYC.

2.  Building Working-Class Power: He co-sponsored the monumental Excluded Workers Fund, securing billions for undocumented and other workers left out of federal pandemic relief – a direct transfer of wealth to the most marginalized, embodying socialist redistribution. He actively supports labor organizing efforts, like the Amazon Labor Union.

3.  Challenging the Carceral State & Imperialism: True to his anti-imperialist roots (influenced by his father's work and his own analysis), Mamdani has been a vocal critic of bloated police budgets, advocating for redirecting funds to community needs. He also took a strong stance against U.S. imperialism, notably criticizing the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan in terms that put him at odds even with some progressive allies like AOC, highlighting his principled anti-interventionism.

4.  A Different Kind of Politician: Mamdani operates with a distinct style. He uses social media aggressively to mobilize constituents and shame opponents. His office prioritizes aggressive constituent services, viewing casework not just as helping individuals but as gathering data on systemic failures to fuel broader campaigns. He rejects corporate donations, funded primarily by small donations and unions.

Why the "Communist" Label? Context and Conflation

The persistent use of "Communist" to describe Mamdani (often by opponents or sensationalist media) stems from several factors:

1.  American Political Lexicon: In the U.S., "socialist" and "communist" are often used interchangeably as boogeyman terms, especially by the right, with little regard for their distinct historical and theoretical meanings. His open embrace of "socialist" makes him an easy target for this conflation.

2.  Radical Rhetoric and Analysis: Mamdani doesn't shy away from Marxist terminology (class struggle, exploitation, imperialism) or radical critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy. This sounds alien and extreme within the narrow confines of mainstream U.S. politics, easily tagged as "communist."

3.  Anti-Imperialism: His strong critiques of U.S. foreign policy, echoing anti-imperialist traditions often associated (fairly or unfairly) with historical communist movements, further fuel the label.

4.  The Shock of the New: A polished, young, effective legislator who is also an open socialist disrupts expectations. The label "communist" is a way for some to dismiss and delegitimize this new political force.

Conclusion: The Organic Intellectual in the State Assembly

Zohran Mamdani is not a doctrinaire Communist carrying a party card from a bygone era. He is, rather, a product of unique circumstances: a profound intellectual inheritance fused with direct, gritty experience of injustice in one of the world's most unequal cities. He is an "organic intellectual" in the Gramscian sense – emerging from and rooted in the struggles of his Queens constituency, wielding elite education not for personal advancement but to articulate and fight for their collective liberation.

His socialist views are not abstract ideology but a concrete response to the systemic failures he has analyzed and witnessed. They are a call for democratic control over the economy, prioritizing human needs over corporate profits, and dismantling the intertwined systems of capitalism, racism, and imperialism. The "communist" label is largely a simplistic and often weaponized misnomer. Mamdani represents something newer and more specific: the rising generation of democratic socialists translating deep systemic critique into practical, hard-nosed legislative politics, aiming to build power for the working class from the ground up, one eviction defense and one budget fight at a time. He embodies the attempt to bridge the gap between radical theory and the material realities of life in New York, making him one of the most distinctive and consequential figures in the state's evolving political landscape.

#Mamdani #NewYork #BlobalizedAntifada #Antifada

The President Has 'CANKLES'

 

Commentary

Everyone now knows Trump has CANKLES. We're 6 months in. The media is all on THAT ... But they couldn't figure out Biden didn't know if it was July or Tuesday for 4 years ...

Trump diagnosed with common vein condition after ankle swelling raises concerns

INDEPENDENT 'OPINION'

The Cankles Conundrum: When Trivial Obsessions Overshadow Substance in Political Media

The viral post cuts with cynical precision: "Everyone now knows Trump has CANKLES. We're 6 months in. The media is all on THAT ... But they couldn't figure out Biden didn't know if it was July or Tuesday for 4 years..." It’s a crude but potent distillation of a pervasive frustration felt by many across the political spectrum: the sense that the modern media landscape often prioritizes the trivial, the sensational, and the visually absurd over substantive scrutiny of power, policy, and fitness for office. This isn't just about Trump's ankles or Biden's age; it's a symptom of a deeper dysfunction in how political information is filtered and consumed.

The "Cankles" Phenomenon: Triviality as Main Event

Let's address the elephant – or perhaps the ankle – in the room. Donald Trump's physique, particularly his legs and ankles, has indeed become an unexpected, bizarre, and persistent media subplot. Social media feeds, cable news chyrons, and even mainstream news articles have dedicated pixels and airtime to analyzing photographs and videos, debating the cause (fluid retention? genetics?), and, yes, popularizing the term "cankles" (calf-ankles) in reference to the 45th President. The coverage ranges from mockery to pseudo-medical speculation.

Why does this happen?

1.  Visual Simplicity & Virality: A photo or short video clip of an unusual physical attribute is instantly digestible. It requires no complex policy understanding. It’s inherently shareable, provoking reactions from amusement to disgust. Algorithms love this.

2.  The Trump Amplifier: Anything related to Trump generates clicks and ratings. His presidency normalized unprecedented levels of personal scrutiny and spectacle. Covering his physical quirks is a low-effort way to tap into the insatiable Trump news vortex.

Joe Biden's Associates Pleading Fifth Amendment Raises Red Flags

3.  Distraction & Entertainment Value: In a chaotic news cycle, focusing on something inherently silly provides a momentary, if superficial, escape. It’s political coverage as reality TV.

4.  Accessibility of Attack: Critiquing appearance feels easier and less "controversial" for some outlets than wading into complex policy debates or making direct assertions about cognitive fitness, which require more evidence and carry greater risk of backlash.

The Biden Cognitive Question: Substance Lost in the Fog?

The second part of the post points to a stark contrast: the perception that sustained, serious media investigation into President Biden's age and cognitive sharpness was lacking or downplayed for years, only becoming unavoidable recently. While conservative media relentlessly hammered the issue, mainstream outlets often treated it with caution, framing it as a Republican talking point or balancing it with counterpoints about Biden's experience or policy wins. Instances of verbal stumbles, moments of apparent confusion, or reduced public visibility were reported, but often not as the central, defining narrative the post's author feels it deserved.

Another Former Biden Associate Pleads 5th Amendment in GOP Investigation

Why this perceived imbalance?

1.  The "Normality" Trap: Biden, despite his age, largely operated within traditional political norms compared to Trump’s constant norm-shattering. Covering policy announcements or diplomatic efforts felt more "substantive" than focusing on gaffes, which all politicians make. The sheer volume of Trump's norm-breaking actions often pushed other stories, including potential concerns about Biden, down the priority list.

2.  Fear of Amplifying Partisan Attacks: Mainstream outlets were acutely aware that the "cognitive decline" narrative was a primary weapon for the GOP. Aggressively pursuing it risked appearing to do the opposition's bidding, especially without definitive medical evidence. The caution sometimes veered into understatement.

3.  Source Reliance: Reporting on cognitive fitness requires sourcing – from doctors (rarely available), close associates (often fiercely loyal), or opponents (inherently biased). This made definitive, non-partisan reporting incredibly difficult.

4.  Focus on Policy Output (Initially): For much of Biden's term, especially early on, the administration was pushing significant legislation (Infrastructure Bill, Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPS Act). Covering these substantive efforts often took precedence over parsing every verbal trip.

5.  The "Lesser of Two Evils" Dynamic (for some): For media figures and consumers deeply alarmed by Trump, highlighting Biden's vulnerabilities felt politically risky, potentially aiding Trump's return. This created an unconscious (or sometimes conscious) downplaying tendency.

The Deeper Disease: Metrics Over Meaning

The juxtaposition of intense "cankles" coverage with perceived hesitancy on Biden's cognitive questions highlights a fundamental flaw in contemporary political media: the tyranny of engagement metrics over democratic responsibility.

The Clickbait Economy: Stories about physical oddities, personal insults, or viral moments generate immediate, massive engagement. They are cheap to produce and guarantee traffic. Complex analyses of governance, policy detail, or nuanced assessments of a leader's capacity are harder, slower, and often less "clicky." The financial incentives are perversely aligned against deep dives into substance.

The Outrage Cycle: Both sides fuel and feed on outrage. Focusing on Trump's ankles feeds liberal outrage and mockery. Focusing *only* on Biden's gaffes feeds conservative outrage. Outrage is a powerful driver of clicks and loyalty, trapping media in a feedback loop that prioritizes emotional reaction over rational analysis.

The Horse Race Mentality: Politics is often covered like a sporting event – who's up, who's down, who made the gaffe, who delivered the zinger. Physical appearance (like a candidate's "look") and verbal stumbles fit neatly into this superficial framework. Evaluating the actual consequences of policy or the day-to-day realities of governing capacity does not.

The Erosion of Gatekeeping: Social media platforms and the proliferation of outlets have demolished traditional editorial hierarchies. Viral nonsense can achieve massive reach instantaneously, forcing even reputable outlets to acknowledge or address it, lest they seem out of touch. This drags everyone down into the triviality swamp.

The Cost: An Underserved Electorate

The real losers in this dynamic are the citizens. When media bandwidth is consumed by ankle aesthetics or when serious questions about a leader's fitness are either sensationalized into oblivion or cautiously tip-toed around, voters are deprived of the information they genuinely need:

1.  Substantive Policy Understanding: How will this policy affect my life, my community, the country? What are the trade-offs? Deep analysis is crowded out by trivia.

2.  Genuine Accountability: Is the President, or any leader, truly capable of executing the immense duties of the office right now? This requires careful, persistent, and fair scrutiny, not just medical conjecture or partisan sniping.

3.  Informed Choice: Voters need clarity on competence, vision, and character. Obsessions with superficialities or the muffled handling of genuine concerns leave them navigating with a distorted map.

4.  Trust in Institutions: When media appears obsessed with nonsense or biased in its focus, public trust erodes further. This cynicism feeds polarization and disengagement.

Beyond Cankles and Confusion: A Call for Refocus

The viral post, despite its bluntness, serves as a necessary indictment. It forces us to confront the absurdity of our political discourse. Moving forward requires conscious effort:

From Media Outlets: Resist the siren song of trivial virality. Re-prioritize substantive reporting and investigations. Apply consistent standards of scrutiny to all powerful figures, regardless of party, focusing on actions, policies, and demonstrable capacity. Provide context and push back against bad-faith amplification of nonsense.

From Consumers: Be critical and deliberate about news sources. Seek out outlets known for depth and analysis. Don't share or engage with content purely because it's outrageous or mocking. Demand better by supporting quality journalism. Recognize that complex issues require nuanced understanding, not just soundbites or memes.

From the Body Politic: Hold leaders accountable for substance. Demand clear policy positions and evidence of capability. Don't reward campaigns or media that descend purely into personal attack or spectacle.

What is Trump's vein condition and how serious is it?

The challenge isn't to ignore a candidate's physical presentation or verbal slips entirely – these can sometimes be relevant data points. The challenge is to prevent them from defining the discourse at the expense of everything else. When "cankles" dominate the headlines while profound questions about leadership capacity struggle for airtime, democracy isn't just being poorly served; it's being actively undermined by a media ecosystem too often chasing clicks instead of truth. The health of the republic depends on us demanding a better, more substantive conversation.

#Trump #Biden #Health #Medical

MasonMedia.info

#information #affiliatemarketing #shopping

Stephen Colbert and the Political Left Ruined The Late Show.

Opinion

Stephen Colbert and the Political Left Ruined 'The Late Show'.

"Stephen Colbert managed to ruin a late night show that had been on over 30 years in just 10 years because he decided to make fun of half the country and bash Conservatives. What a shame."

Independent View

That's a strong opinion, and while it's valid to feel that way, whether Stephen Colbert and "the political left" ruined The Late Show depends heavily on your perspective and what you valued in late-night TV. Here's a balanced look at the arguments:

Arguments that Colbert's Political Focus "Ruined" the Show (from a critical perspective)

1. Shift from Letterman's Tone: David Letterman's humor was often absurdist, ironic, and less overtly partisan. Colbert's sharp, politically-driven satire feels fundamentally different, alienating viewers who preferred the older style.

2. Perceived Partisanship: Critics argue Colbert moved from satirizing all politics (as he did brilliantly on The Colbert Report) to primarily targeting the right, especially during the Trump era. This can feel like preaching to the liberal choir rather than universal comedy.

3. Loss of "Fun" or Escapism: Some viewers feel late-night should be an escape from the day's political battles. Colbert's monologues and interviews often dive deep into political conflict, making the show feel more like an extension of the news cycle.

4. Changed Interview Dynamics: Interviews can sometimes become more focused on political messaging or activism than pure entertainment or personal stories, especially with political figures or celebrities discussing causes.

5. Nostalgia for Neutrality: There's a longing (perhaps idealized) for a time when late-night hosts were seen as more politically neutral figures, even if that wasn't always entirely true.

Arguments that Colbert Evolved the Show (from a supportive perspective)

Was Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' Canceled Because of Trump? What to Know

1. Reflecting the Times: Supporters argue Colbert adapted the show to an intensely polarized political era. His focus mirrors the concerns of a large segment of his audience who want commentary on current events from a progressive perspective.

2. Playing to His Strengths: Colbert's genius lies in political satire. Expecting him to abandon that core strength for a generic format would likely have resulted in a less distinctive, less authentic show.

3. Critical Success & Awards: The show has won numerous Emmys and critical acclaim under Colbert, particularly for its writing and political segments.

4. Ratings Success: For many years after his start, Colbert consistently beat his main competitor, Jimmy Fallon, in the ratings, especially among the key demographic advertisers seek. This suggests his approach resonated strongly with a large audience. (Ratings have fluctuated more recently, as they do for all late-night shows).

5. Defining a Clear Voice: In a crowded late-night landscape, Colbert carved out a clear identity distinct from the more playful Fallon or the more music/interview-focused Kimmel. His show serves a specific audience looking for political humor and insight.

6. Continuation of Satire Tradition: Late-night has always had a political edge (e.g., Johnny Carson, Letterman himself, Jon Stewart). Colbert's approach is seen by supporters as an evolution, not a betrayal, of this tradition, albeit with a sharper point during extraordinary times.

Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' on CBS is getting canceled. Lawmakers want to know if it's because of his political views.

The "Ruined" Verdict: It's Subjective

If you valued apolitical, absurdist humor and broad accessibility: Colbert's Late Show likely feels like a significant downgrade or a fundamental change in the show's purpose – hence, "ruined."

If you value sharp political satire and progressive commentary: Colbert's Late Show is a vital voice and a successful evolution of the format, fulfilling a demand unmet by competitors.

Key Takeaways:

Colbert absolutely changed the show's DNA from the Letterman era. It's now undeniably political and progressive-leaning.

This change alienated some viewers who preferred the old style or dislike the perceived partisanship.

This change also attracted a large, loyal audience who appreciate his perspective, making the show critically and commercially successful for a long time.

"Ruined" is a value judgment. It reflects a personal preference for what late-night TV should be, not an objective measure of quality. The show's success metrics contradict the idea that it was objectively "ruined" for the audience it targets.

Ultimately, whether it's "ruined" depends entirely on what you want from a late-night talk show. The show under Colbert is simply a very different product than it was under Letterman, catering to a different audience in a different time.

#stephencolbert #CBS #thelateshow

Stephen Colbert’s ‘Late Show’ is canceled by CBS and will end in May 2026

A Lead Scientist At Johnson and Johnson Admits The Covid Vaccine Was Not Going To Work On Video.

 

A Lead Scientist At Johnson and Johnson Admits The Covid Vaccine Was Not Going To Work On Video.

A Johnson and Johnson Lead Scientist was caught on video by Axios recently laughing about the Covid 19 virus they produced didn't do what they told us it was going to do. The networks won't cover it. He has since been removed ... at least off the Johnson and Johnson website.

A Woman who works at Pfizer was asked if she got the vaccine. She said NO, it wasn't fully  tested and she knew it wouldn't work.

People were canceled,  lost careers, and contact with family and friends over a fake vaccine that didn't prevent catching, spreading,  or dying from Covid. They lied for money and control. I never fell for the 'poison poke'.

BREAKING: OMG: Johnson & Johnson Lead Scientist Confesses J&J Covid Vaccine Was ‘Not Safe and Effective’ – “Lack of Research”

#Vaccine #Covid #Covid19 #JohnsonandJohnson

Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theorists peddling sci-fi novel written by AG William Barr’s late dad

#JefferyEpstein #AG #Epstein #WilliamBarr #BillBar

US House agrees to consider crypto legislation in big win for the digital asset industry

#Congress #Bitcoin #Crypto #Cryptocurrency

Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey and prosecutor of Jeffrey Epstein, is fired

She also prosecuted the Sean "Diddy" Combs sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial in New York

Is the timing peculiar or is it just me?

#maurenecomey #DOJ #jamescomey #Epstein

Jeffery Epstein and Bill Clinton

 

Jeffery Epstein and Bill Clinton

I just heard a statement by Dan Bonjino from when he had his Podcast before he became Assistant FBI Director. He is also a former Secret Service Agent. He told a story about Epstein and Bill Clinton. He was talking to another Secret Service Agent who did a TEMP Detail covering Bill Clinton. He kept referring to Epstein and Clinton as "This Guy". Apparently he didn't know who Bill Clinton was, nor Epstein. He said they on the plane and there these GIRLS, clearly NOT of age. They were not Women he said. (He knew what a Woman was).

Then he says it got weird. Bill Clinton gets up and goes to the back of the plane with 2 of the GIRLS. When that plane made a stop the TEMP Secret Service Agent went and found the Detail Supervisor. He told the Supervisor what he saw. He then told the Supervisor "I'm not getting back on that plane." So they kindly sent him home.

Epstein videotaped everything...Bill Clinton flew 26 times on Epstein's plane. "The plane! The plane!"

#Clinton #Epstein #LolitaExpress 

"This Mobster was in prison for 8 years. He said he stayed in the exact same cell ad Epstein. He said unless you're a midget you can't hang yourself. (Where is the missing 2.5 minutes of jailhouse tape anyway?!?!)"

Former mobster once jailed in Jeffrey Epstein’s cell says suicide inside would be ‘impossible’

An inmate who served time in the exact jail cell where Jeffrey Epstein died said it would be “impossible” for the pedophile to have killed himself inside.

By 

Alex Oliveira 

Published July 15, 2025, 6:52 p.m. ET

#Epstein #JefferyEpstein #SexTrafficking

Ex-FBI Director Comey and ex-CIA Director Brennan are under investigation by Trump Justice Department

#fbi #comey #Brennan #DOJ #JusticeDepartment 

Was Biden Aware of What His Name Was Put On?

What is an autopen? Here's what to know about the devices used by presidents, writers and more.

#Biden #Comer #AutoPen #Politics

Biden admits he didn’t approve each individual pardon, chief of staff Zients signed off on last-day clemencies

An autopen is a device that automatically replicates a person's handwritten signature using a mechanical arm, robotic pen, or stamp-like mechanism. Here's a detailed breakdown:

Key Features:

1. Mechanical Operation:  

   - A pre-programmed machine holds a pen and mimics the exact motions of a human signature.  

   - The signature is typically "recorded" in advance by the person or copied from a sample.

2. Purpose:  

   - Efficiency: Allows celebrities, politicians, or executives to "sign" large volumes of documents (e.g., autographs, letters, certificates) without manual effort.  

   - Consistency: Produces near-identical signatures every time.  

3. Common Users:  

   - Public Figures: Presidents, monarchs, or CEOs (e.g., U.S. presidents use autopens for non-legally binding correspondence).  

   - Artists/Authors: For mass-signing books, memorabilia, or artwork.  

Controversies & Limitations:

- Authenticity Debate:  

  - While convenient, autopen signatures lack the personal touch of a genuine signature, raising ethical questions (e.g., fans paying for "autographed" items).  

- Legal Validity:  

  - Not binding where laws require "wet ink" signatures (e.g., wills, contracts). Some jurisdictions explicitly ban autopens for legal documents.  

  - High-profile cases (e.g., Barack Obama's 2011 debt-ceiling extension signature via autopen) sparked legal debates.  

How It Works:

1. A signature sample is digitized or traced.  

2. The machine’s robotic arm replays the exact movements.  

3. Advanced versions use pneumatic systems or programmable stamps.  

Fun Fact:  

The autopen dates back to the 1800s, but modern versions gained popularity in the 20th century—Winston Churchill and John F. Kennedy famously used them.  

Autopen vs. Forgery:  

While both replicate signatures, autopens are authorized by the signer, whereas forgeries are fraudulent. However, undisclosed autopen use can still mislead recipients.  

In short: An autopen is a "robotic signer" for mass-producing identical signatures—a tool of convenience that walks a fine line between practicality and authenticity.

We're gonna get Copper from Indonesia.

 

We're gonna get Copper from Indonesia.

Securing the Conduit: Why Indonesia is Emerging as a Critical Copper Source

Copper, the "metal of electrification," pulses at the heart of our modern world. From the intricate circuitry in smartphones to the windings in massive electric motors and the vast networks of power grids enabling the energy transition, its unparalleled conductivity makes it indispensable. As global demand surges, driven relentlessly by decarbonization, electric vehicles (EVs), and expanding digital infrastructure, securing reliable and strategic sources becomes paramount. Against this backdrop, Indonesia is rapidly transforming from a significant regional player into a crucial global supplier of copper, making the strategic decision to source from its rich archipelago increasingly compelling.

Indonesia's Copper Bounty: A Geological Powerhouse

Indonesia's copper wealth is anchored in its dramatic geology, particularly the collision of tectonic plates that formed the resource-rich island of Papua. This is home to the crown jewel: the Grasberg mine complex. Operated by PT Freeport Indonesia (majority-owned by U.S.-based Freeport-McMoRan) and now involving Indonesia's state-owned mining holding company, MIND ID, Grasberg is not just Indonesia's largest copper mine – it's one of the biggest and highest-grade copper-gold deposits on the planet. Beyond Grasberg, significant operations include the **Batu Hijau mine** on Sumbawa (operated by PT Amman Mineral Nusa Tenggara), contributing substantially to national output.

While exact rankings fluctuate with production cycles and market conditions, Indonesia consistently ranks among the **world's top five copper producers**. Crucially, its reserves are vast, ensuring long-term supply potential. This geological endowment provides a foundational advantage for any nation or company looking to secure copper for the decades ahead.

Beyond Geology: The Strategic Drivers for Sourcing Indonesian Copper

Choosing Indonesia isn't just about pulling metal from the ground; it's a multi-faceted strategic decision:

1. Proximity to Soaring Asian Demand: Indonesia sits at the heart of Southeast Asia, the world's fastest-growing economic region. Crucially, it is also incredibly close to the manufacturing behemoths of China, Japan, and South Korea – nations driving massive consumption of copper for electronics, EVs, and infrastructure. Sourcing from Indonesia drastically reduces shipping times, costs, and associated logistical complexities and carbon footprint compared to sourcing from South America or Africa.

2.  The EV Battery Ecosystem Play: Indonesia has made an audacious, and increasingly successful, bet on becoming a global hub for the entire EV battery supply chain, leveraging its world-leading nickel reserves. Copper is intrinsically linked to this ecosystem. EVs use significantly more copper than internal combustion engine vehicles – in motors, wiring, charging infrastructure, and battery components themselves. Sourcing copper within this developing battery supercluster offers potential for integrated supply chains, reduced transport costs, and synergistic partnerships with nickel and cobalt processors. It's about being part of a vertically integrated future.

3. Government Policy & Resource Nationalism (A Double-Edged Sword): Indonesia's government, under President Joko Widodo, has aggressively pursued a policy of "downstreaming" – adding value domestically by banning or restricting exports of raw minerals and mandating domestic processing and smelting. This policy, while creating investment hurdles and market disruptions in the short term (like the controversial nickel ore export ban), aims to build a robust domestic metals processing industry. For copper, this translates to:

 Smelter Development: Major investments are underway in copper smelters, notably Freeport's massive Gresik smelter in Java (expected operational 2024/2025) and Amman Mineral's expansion. This means an increasing share of Indonesia's copper will be exported as higher-value cathode rather than concentrate.

 Shifting Ownership Dynamics: The government has successfully negotiated increased domestic ownership stakes in major mines like Grasberg, ensuring greater national control and benefit sharing. This fosters stability but requires navigating complex partnerships.

4.  Diversification of Supply Chains: The global pandemic and geopolitical tensions exposed the fragility of overly concentrated supply chains. Over-reliance on traditional copper giants like Chile and Peru carries inherent risks. Sourcing from Indonesia provides a vital diversification, enhancing supply security for consumers globally, particularly in Asia. It mitigates risks associated with labor disputes, political instability, or logistical chokepoints in other regions.

Navigating the Terrain: Challenges and Considerations

Sourcing copper from Indonesia is not without its complexities. Prudent buyers must navigate:

The Downstreaming Mandate: While beneficial long-term, the push for domestic processing can lead to temporary export restrictions, complex licensing requirements, and uncertainty around concentrate exports as smelters come online. Understanding the current regulatory landscape and future policy direction is essential.

Infrastructure Constraints: Despite progress, logistical bottlenecks (port capacity, internal transportation) can still pose challenges, particularly for operations in remote Papua. Reliability and cost of power for processing can also be concerns.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Scrutiny: Large-scale mining, especially in sensitive ecological areas like Papua, faces intense ESG scrutiny. Issues related to tailings management, water usage, deforestation, community relations (including indigenous rights), and transparency require rigorous due diligence and commitment to international best practices from suppliers. Reputational risk is a significant factor.

Political and Regulatory Stability: While generally stable, navigating Indonesia's bureaucracy and understanding the nuances of regional autonomy can be complex. Policy shifts, while often signaling long-term intent, can create short-term market uncertainty. Building strong local partnerships is key.

Competition: The strategic importance of Indonesian copper is recognized globally. Buyers face competition not only from traditional consumers but increasingly from Chinese companies deeply invested in the Indonesian battery materials ecosystem.

The Future is Copper, and Indonesia is Key

The trajectory for copper demand is unequivocally upwards. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that achieving global climate goals could see copper demand double by 2040. Indonesia, with its vast reserves, strategic location, and aggressive push to integrate into the high-value EV and green technology supply chains, is positioning itself as a linchpin in meeting this demand.

Procuring from Indonesia today is an investment in that future. It means:

Securing Long-Term Supply: Accessing one of the world's largest and most significant copper reserve.

Optimizing Logistics: Reducing costs and complexity through proximity to major Asian manufacturing hubs.

Aligning with Megatrends: Embedding your supply chain within the rapidly evolving Asian EV and battery ecosystem.

Enhancing Resilience: Diversifying sources away from traditional but potentially vulnerable supply lines.

Conclusion: A Strategic Imperative

"We're gonna get copper from Indonesia" is more than a procurement decision; it's a recognition of a profound shift in the global resource landscape. Indonesia is no longer merely a source of raw ore; it is evolving into a sophisticated producer of refined copper, strategically intertwined with the industries that consume it most voraciously. While challenges exist, as they do in any major resource play, the strategic advantages – geological endowment, geographic positioning, integration into the green economy, and government commitment to value addition – are compelling.

Navigating the Indonesian copper landscape requires diligence, strong partnerships, and a keen understanding of the local context and evolving policies. However, for those looking to secure reliable, strategically located copper supplies for the electrified, decarbonized future, Indonesia is not just an option; it is rapidly becoming an **imperative**. The copper conduit of the 21st century runs powerfully through the Indonesian archipelago.

#TradeDeals #Indonesia #Trump #Trade #Copper