Search This Blog

Noble Gold

NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK

Real Time US National Debt Clock | USA Debt Clock.com


United States National Debt $36,228,453,605,413.90
United States National Debt Per Person $104,947.45
United States National Debt Per Household $271,813.90
Total US Unfunded Liabilities $126,892,524,873,657.11
Social Security Unfunded Liability $15,960,915,581,422.12
Medicare Unfunded Liability $81,218,130,005,209.94
Prescription Drug Unfunded Liability $20,353,500,968,518.96
National Healthcare Unfunded Liability $9,359,978,318,506.12
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Person $367,585.31
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Household $952,045.95
United States Population 345,205,649
Share this site:

Copyright 1987-2024

(last updated 2024-08-09/Close of previous day debt was $35123327978028.47 )

Market Indices

Market News

Stocks HeatMap

Crypto Coins HeatMap

The Weather

Conservative News

powered by Surfing Waves

4/22/25

Words From A Bigot

 A RANT / OPINION


WORDS FROM A BIGOT:


In 2015 my Black Ass was called a BIGOT for supporting Trump and opposing ILLEGAL Migration. I told you what would happen. For those of you that called me a BIGOT ... F*** YOOOOUUUUUU!!!


When Biden was running for office and told every ILLEGAL to come here we told you what would happen. I was called a COON and a sellout. YOUR ILLEGALS ARE BEING SENT BACK!!! YOUR PARTY IS BEGGING TO GET THEM BACK! GUESS WHAT ... F*** YOOOOUUUUUU!!!


At the current pace of deportations it will take 28 YEARS to get them all OUT. It will take 28 years to undo what Biden F***Ed up in 4 years.


F*** YOOOOUUUUUUU!!!!


~The BIGOT


#migration #Illegals

Updates on Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines: What We Know in 2024

 


Updates on Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines: What We Know in 2024 


Since the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in late 2020, billions of doses have been administered worldwide, playing a crucial role in reducing severe illness, hospitalizations, and deaths. As vaccination campaigns continue, ongoing research and surveillance have provided updated insights into the safety profiles and potential side effects of these vaccines.  

This article explores the latest findings on COVID-19 vaccine side effects, including common reactions, rare adverse events, and long-term safety data.  

1. Common Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines  

Most side effects of COVID-19 vaccines are mild to moderate and resolve within a few days. These reactions are signs that the immune system is responding to the vaccine. Common side effects include:  

a. Local Reactions 

- Pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site (most frequent)  

- Mild warmth or itching  

b. Systemic Reactions  

- Fatigue  

- Headache  

- Muscle or joint pain  

- Chills or mild fever  

- Nausea  

These effects are more common after the second dose of mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna) and in younger individuals, whose immune systems tend to react more robustly.  

2. Rare but Serious Side Effects  

While most vaccine reactions are mild, rare but more severe side effects have been identified through global surveillance systems like VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and the WHO’s VigiBase.  

a. Myocarditis and Pericarditis  

- What is it? Inflammation of the heart muscle (myocarditis) or lining (pericarditis).  

- Risk factors: Most reported in males aged 12–30, particularly after the second dose of mRNA vaccines.  

- Latest data: Studies show that the risk remains very low (approximately 1–10 cases per 100,000 doses) and most cases are mild, with recovery within weeks.  

- Recommendations: The CDC and WHO still recommend vaccination due to the higher risk of myocarditis from COVID-19 infection itself.  

b. Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS)  

- What is it? A rare blood clotting disorder linked to adenovirus-based vaccines (AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson).  

- Risk factors: More common in women under 60, occurring within 4–28 days post-vaccination.  

- Latest data: Estimated risk is about 1–5 cases per 100,000 doses. Many countries now recommend alternative vaccines for younger populations.  

c. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

- What is it? A rare neurological disorder causing muscle weakness and paralysis.  

- Risk factors: Slightly increased risk after adenovirus vaccines (J&J, AstraZeneca).  

- Latest data: The FDA added a warning for J&J’s vaccine, but cases remain extremely rare (~1 in 100,000).  

d. Anaphylaxis  

- What is it? A severe allergic reaction requiring immediate medical attention.  

- Risk factors: More common in people with a history of severe allergies.  

- Latest data: Occurs in about 2–5 cases per million doses, mostly within 15 minutes of vaccination.  

3. Long-Term Safety Data  

One of the biggest concerns early in the vaccination campaign was whether COVID-19 vaccines could cause long-term side effects. However, extensive monitoring has shown:  

- No evidence of delayed severe effects: Most vaccine-related side effects appear within days to weeks, with no significant long-term risks detected.  

- Fertility and pregnancy: Studies confirm no negative impact on fertility, and vaccination is strongly recommended for pregnant individuals due to higher COVID-19 risks.  

- Cancer and autoimmune diseases: No credible links have been found between COVID-19 vaccines and increased cancer or autoimmune disorder risks.  

4. Comparing Side Effects Across Different Vaccines 

| Vaccine Type | Common Side Effects | Rare Side Effects |  

|-------------|---------------------|------------------|  

| mRNA (Pfizer, Moderna) | Fatigue, headache, muscle pain | Myocarditis (rare) |  

| Adenovirus (J&J, AstraZeneca) | Fever, chills, fatigue | TTS, GBS (very rare) |  

| Protein-based (Novavax) | Injection-site pain, fatigue | Fewer rare events reported |  

5. Why Vaccination Remains Critical  

Despite rare side effects, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh the risks:  

- Reduces severe illness and death (vaccinated individuals are 10x less likely to die from COVID-19).  

- Lowers Long COVID risk (studies show vaccines reduce the chance of long-term symptoms).  

- Protects vulnerable populations (elderly, immunocompromised).  

6. What Should You Do If You Experience Side Effects?  

- Mild reactions: Rest, hydrate, and use over-the-counter pain relievers (if needed).  

- Severe reactions (chest pain, severe headache, leg swelling): Seek immediate medical help.  

- Report adverse events: Use national reporting systems (e.g., VAERS in the U.S.) to help track vaccine safety.  

Conclusion  

COVID-19 vaccines have proven to be overwhelmingly safe, with most side effects being mild and temporary. While rare serious reactions like myocarditis and blood clots have been identified, they remain extremely uncommon, and vaccination continues to be the best defense against severe COVID-19 outcomes.  

Ongoing surveillance ensures that any new risks are quickly identified and addressed. For the latest updates, consult trusted sources like the CDC, WHO, or your national health authority.  

#Covid #CoronaVirus #Covid19 #CDC

4/21/25

Can We Get A Black Pope?




Will we see the first black or Asian Pope? The contenders to replace Francis after his death at 88





Democrats, PLEASE keep doing what you are doing. I have Popcorn.




Johnson: Democrats ‘doubling and tripling’ down on policies that resulted in ‘big victory’ for GOP

United Healthcare Stocks Down 20%


United Healthcare Stocks Down 20%

"United HealthCare Stocks are down 20%. It has nothing to do with the CEO shooting. Trump simply said ILLEGALS can't get MEDICAID ... So the MONEY Is drying up ...Profits are down."

UnitedHealthcare Stocks Drop 20%: Medicaid Funding Cuts—Not CEO Incident—Drive Decline 

Introduction   

UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH), one of the largest health insurance providers in the U.S., has seen its stock price plummet by 20% in recent weeks. While some speculated that the highly publicized incident involving the CEO might be a factor, the real driver behind the decline is financial. Former President Donald Trump recently reinforced policies restricting Medicaid access for undocumented immigrants ("illegals"), leading to a significant reduction in government reimbursements. This policy shift has directly impacted UnitedHealthcare's revenue streams, causing investors to react sharply.  

This article explores:  

1. The real reason behind UnitedHealthcare’s stock decline—Medicaid funding cuts.  

2. Why the CEO shooting incident is a distraction, not a market mover.  

3. How Trump’s immigration policies affect Medicaid reimbursements and insurer profits.  

4. The broader implications for the healthcare industry and other insurers.  

1. Medicaid Funding Cuts—Not the CEO—Are Crushing UnitedHealthcare’s Profits  

A. The Stock Drop: By the Numbers  

- UnitedHealthcare’s stock fell 20% over recent trading sessions.  

- Market capitalization dropped by tens of billions, reflecting investor concerns over revenue.  

- Analysts cite reduced Medicaid reimbursements as the primary cause, not corporate scandals.  

B. Trump’s Policy Shift: No Medicaid for Undocumented Immigrants

Former President Trump recently reiterated his stance:  

> "Illegals can't get Medicaid."  

This policy enforcement means:  

- Fewer Medicaid enrollments → Lower government payouts to insurers like UnitedHealthcare.  

- States tightening eligibility, leading to dropped coverage for previously enrolled individuals.  

- Profit margins shrinking as insurers lose a key revenue source.  

C. Why This Hits UnitedHealthcare Hard  

UnitedHealthcare is the largest Medicaid managed care provider in the U.S., covering over 7.7 million Medicaid beneficiaries.  

- Medicaid makes up ~25% of UnitedHealth’s revenue.  

- Cuts directly hurt profitability, leading to the stock decline.  

Bottom Line: The market isn’t reacting to CEO drama—it’s reacting to lost Medicaid dollars.  

2. Why the CEO Shooting Isn’t the Real Issue  

A. The Incident Recap

- UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty was involved in a non-fatal shooting incident (unrelated to company operations).  

- While shocking, Wall Street doesn’t care--unless it affects financials.  

B. Stocks Move on Earnings, Not Headlines 

- UnitedHealth’s Q1 earnings showed Medicaid pressures before the CEO incident.  

- No major leadership shakeup occurred; operations remain stable.  

- Investors focus on policies that impact cash flow, not sensational news.  

Conclusion: The CEO story was a media distraction, not a market mover.  

3. How Trump’s Immigration Policies Affect Medicaid—And Insurer Profits 

A. Medicaid’s Role in Health Insurance

- Medicaid is a government-funded program for low-income individuals.  

- Insurers like UnitedHealthcare administer Medicaid plans under state contracts.  

- More enrollees = more government payouts to insurers.  

B. Trump’s Crackdown on Non-Citizen Medicaid Use  

- 2019 Public Charge Rule: Made it harder for immigrants to get green cards if they used Medicaid.  

- 2024 Enforcement: States purging ineligible enrollees, reducing insurer payouts.  

- Result: Fewer people on Medicaid →less money for UnitedHealthcare.  

C. Financial Impact on UnitedHealth 

- Lower enrollment = lower premium revenue.  

- Fixed costs remain, squeezing profit margins.  

- Stock downgrades from analysts expecting weaker earnings.  

Key Takeaway: This is a policy-driven earnings problem, not a one-time event.  

4. Broader Implications for the Healthcare Industry

A. Other Insurers Also at Risk  

- Centene, Molina, Anthem—all heavy Medicaid players—could see similar drops.  

- Smaller insurers may struggle more with funding cuts.  

B. State Budgets & Medicaid Funding 

- States may push back against federal cuts, but options are limited.  

- Insurers will lobby for alternative funding to offset losses.  

C. Long-Term Outlook 

- If Trump wins in 2024, more Medicaid restrictions could come.  

- If Biden wins, some funding may return, but deficit concerns remain.  

Investor Warning: Healthcare stocks are now tied to election politics more than ever.  

Conclusion: UnitedHealthcare’s Stock Drop Is All About Medicaid Money  

The 20% plunge in UnitedHealth’s stock isn’t about the CEO—it’s about Trump’s Medicaid policies drying up revenue. With fewer enrollees and shrinking government payouts, profits are down, and investors are fleeing.  

Key Takeaways: 

1. Medicaid cuts are the #1 driver of UnitedHealth’s stock decline.  

2. The CEO incident was irrelevant to financial performance.  

3. Trump’s policies have real financial consequences for insurers.  

4. Other Medicaid-heavy insurers could face similar drops.  

#UnitedHealthcare #Medicaid #Medicare #Healthcare


**Final Thought:** Investors must now **watch politics as closely as earnings reports**—because in healthcare, **policy changes move markets**.  


---  


**Disclaimer:** This is not financial advice. Always conduct your own research before investing.

Dems Try To Scare Blacks Into Supporting The Return of Deported ILLEGALS


Dems Try To Scare Blacks Into Supporting The Return of Deported ILLEGALS

The Democrats have a new joke as a narrative. They are telling Black Folks we need to support ILLEGALS being sent back from El Salvador because if they go after them they'll come after us. I hope no one falls for that. ILLEGALS  are ILLEGAL. They came here ILLEGALLY. Another, this is about Policy and the Law, not Race. 

Let's do some math. Only 12% of the ILLEGALS are Caucasian. That means there there is an 88% chance that the ILLEGALS deported will be a 'person of color'. Also, when a US citizen is raped, robbed, kidnapped, or killed by an ILLEGAL the ILLEGAL is usually a Male 'person of color'. It is what it is. They are going after the worst first.

The reason they are pushing this NOW is not just because of the deportations, it because the Blacks in Chicago have had ENOUGH!!! They have lost access to neighborhood parks and community centers for the benefit the ILLEGALS. There is too much NGO money out there for the local government to pass up. One property owner gets $61/square foot to house ILLEGALS in a average warehouse. They dumped the ILLEGALS in Black neighborhoods  and directed NGO resources to them. So the Democrats are trying to get ahead of a fire they started because they are losing Black votes and counting.

I hope no one is buying this. This is what happens when you have a dumbed down education system. Instead of tapping the brain, they pull emotional strings. They are desperate for another George Floyd moment.

#illegals #immigration #migration #Blacks #AfricanAmericans #deportations

4/20/25

"Pay Their Fair Share"

 


"Pay Their Fair Share"


Democrats always claim the rich don't pay their fair share...Unless it's them.

JB Pritzker, the Democratic Governor of Illinois, aka 'Jelly Belly', who wants to be President, was born a BILLIONAIRE. He is one of the 'Oligarchs' that Bernie Sanders and AOC won't mention. He buys off political candidates. The Pritzker family runs 64 NGO's. They are considered 'Philanthropists' as a cover for where the money goes. Here is where the 'greed' shows up. He inherited 1.9 Billion Dollars. He has a vacant mansion in Illinois that was worth 6 Million dollars. He had all of the bathrooms ripped out making the mansion uninhabitable. The assessed value dropped from 6 Million to 1 Million. It saved him $330,000 in property taxes. It also caught the attention of the IRS for tax evasion. If he runs for President I am sure he will be asked. However, he is a BILLIONAIRE that Democrats like. 

Then we got the New York A.G., Letitia James. James bought a five-family property in Brooklyn in 2001 with a loan that is only available for homes with four units or less. She lied on the loan documents. During the last two decades, she has consistently misrepresented the same property as only having four units in both building permit applications and several mortgage documents and applications. In 2023 Lititia James purchased a home in Norfolk, VA. She put on the loan docs that it would be her PRIMARY residence. At that time she was the NY A.G. and still is. By law the NY A.G. must live in NEW YORK. A primary residence statement get you a better interest rate. There was no victim in the civil suit she brought against Trump. She claimed that Trump over valued his property in Florida...and she is in New York. She claimed he over valued the property to get bigger loans, so he got money someone else should have gotten. Th we banks he dealt with were satisfied, got paid, and were ready to do business again. Same with the insurance companies. James is the one that got something she shouldn't have gotten. She convinced the court to require Trump to pay 500 Million Dollars because she made them think she knew more about real estate thank Trump and the banks.

Then we have Senator Elizabeth Warren. She and her husband made a chunk of money flipping foreclosed houses after the 2008 housing crisis. Warren made $240,500 (before deducting unknown remodeling costs) in the mid-1990s by flipping five houses in Oklahoma. Several of the homes were foreclosures, and a lack of permits on file with local government suggests she did not make significant improvements in some of the houses before flipping them. Now, Warren, Bernie Sanders, and the Astronaut  Senator Kelly are grabbing up the drug money and hating on RFK Jr.

Then we have AOC. She has raised 9 Million Dollars during the first quarter of 2025. And she is on the 'OLIGARCHY' Tour with the 1% Bernie Sanders.

Bernie Sanders owns multiple homes and never had a job in the private sector. Barack Obama owns multiple homes and has never had a private sector job.

All of the people mentioned in the piece have figured a way to transfer Government money to their pockets.

#BernieSanders #MarkKelly #ElizabethWarren #JBPritzker #Trump #LititiaJames


4/19/25

Dana Perino vs. Tyrus

 A PIC TO REMEMBER



I knew she was tiny, but not this tiny! She was the BUSH 43 Press Secretary.. She ( Dana Perino) is now a FOX Anchor and Tyrus also works at FOX. She is small, he is HUGE!!!

Dana Perino vs. Tyrus 👀

"I'm thankful he is on team freedom and liberty." 😁

#DanaParino #Tyrus #FOX #News

4/18/25

Stop It! Climate Change Does NOT Affect Your Allergies

 


Stop It! Climate Change Does NOT Affect Your Allergies!!! 20 Days Doesn’t Make a Difference!  

Introduction  

Every allergy season, the same tired narrative gets recycled: "Climate change is making your allergies worse!" Headlines scream that pollen seasons are longer, stronger, and more brutal—all thanks to global warming. But before you nod along with this trendy talking point, let’s take a step back and ask: Is this really true? Or is it just another example of climate alarmism hijacking a common health issue to push an agenda?

The truth is, climate change has a negligible impact on your allergies, and the small shifts in pollen seasons don’t justify the dramatic claims. A few extra days of sniffles aren’t the climate apocalypse—they’re just normal variations in weather patterns. So let’s break down why blaming your runny nose on CO₂ emissions is more hype than science.  

1. The "Longer Pollen Season" Myth: 20 Days Doesn’t Change Your Life  

One of the biggest arguments is that climate change is extending pollen seasons, making allergies worse. Studies often cite that pollen seasons are starting earlier and lasting longer—sometimes by 10 to 20 days compared to decades ago.  

But let’s put that into perspective:  

- 20 extra days spread over months is hardly noticeable in daily life.  

- Allergy seasons already vary naturally—some years are worse than others due to rainfall, temperature fluctuations, and other non-climate factors.  

- Most people’s allergy suffering peaks for a few weeks, not the entire season. A slightly longer season doesn’t automatically mean worse symptoms.  

If your allergies are brutal this year, it’s far more likely due to local weather conditions (like a wet spring leading to more plant growth) than a fractional increase in CO₂ levels.  

2. Pollen Levels Were Always High—You Just Notice Now  

Another claim is that pollen counts are higher than ever. But is that really because of climate change? Or are we just measuring and reporting it more?  

- Pollen monitoring has improved dramatically in recent decades. More stations + better tech = higher recorded counts.  

- Urbanization means more people are exposed to allergenic plants (like ragweed) that thrive in disturbed soils.  

- The "hygiene hypothesis" suggests that modern cleanliness (less exposure to microbes) may be making immune systems more reactive to allergens.  

None of these factors have much to do with global warming. Yet, activists conveniently ignore them to push the climate narrative.  

3. CO₂ Boosts Plant Growth—But Not Allergens Equally  

Yes, higher CO₂ levels can stimulate plant growth. But does that automatically mean more misery for allergy sufferers? Not necessarily.  

- Not all plants respond the same way—some weeds (like ragweed) may produce more pollen, but grasses and trees show mixed responses.  

- More CO₂ also means more plant competition—so while some allergens might increase, others could be suppressed by faster-growing species.  

- Urban landscaping choices (like planting male trees that produce pollen) have a far bigger impact on local pollen levels than CO₂. 

The idea that rising CO₂ directly translates to unbearable allergies is an oversimplification—and yet another way climate alarmists exaggerate minor effects. 

4. Allergy Rates Are Rising—But Not Because of Climate Change  

Allergies are becoming more common, but the reasons have little to do with the climate:  

- Increased diagnosis & awareness—More people are getting tested for allergies now than in the past.  

- Diet & lifestyle changes—Processed foods, lack of sunlight (vitamin D), and sedentary habits may weaken immune systems.  

- Overuse of antibiotics & sanitizers—Disrupting natural microbiomes could be making people more prone to allergies.  

These are real, measurable factors—unlike the tenuous link between CO₂ and your sneezing fits.  

5. The Media’s Role in Hyping Climate-Allergy Hysteria  

Why does the "climate change = worse allergies" myth persist? Because it fits a narrative.  

- Fear sells—Headlines like "Climate Change Is Making Your Allergies Worse!" get more clicks than "Seasonal Variations Exist." 

- It personalizes climate change—If people think global warming is directly harming their health, they’re more likely to support drastic policies.  

- It distracts from real solutions—Instead of pushing for better urban planning or allergy treatments, activists blame everything on fossil fuels.  

This isn’t science—it’s propaganda disguised as public health advice.  

Conclusion: Allergies Are Annoying, But Don’t Blame Climate Change  

Yes, pollen seasons may be shifting slightly. Yes, some plants might produce more allergens in a higher-CO₂ world. But the impact is tiny compared to natural variability and other lifestyle factors.  

Blaming your allergies on climate change is like blaming a rainy picnic on the ozone layer—it’s an exaggerated, politicized stretch. Instead of buying into the hype, focus on real solutions:  

- Monitor local pollen counts and adjust outdoor activities accordingly.  

- Improve indoor air quality with filters and reduced humidity.  

- Consult an allergist for treatments like immunotherapy instead of waiting for governments to "fix" the climate.  

The next time someone tells you climate change is wrecking your sinuses, just say: **"Stop it! A few extra days of pollen won’t kill me—but your alarmism might give me a headache."**  

Final Thought

Allergies have existed for centuries. Climate change might tweak them at the margins, but it’s not the root cause. Let’s stop using every health issue as an excuse to push climate panic—and start dealing with allergies like the normal, manageable condition they are.

#allergies #illness #sickness #allergyseason #health #wellness

"Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law"

 



"Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law":

I know the investigation isn't over in the Texas stabbing death. I understand it was just a kid that allegedly committed the homicide. However, when he was arrested he said "I did it." Then, a Police officer was taking him to the jail/station, the kid asked the officer "Can I use Self Defense?"

African American Parents talk about giving their kids 'The Talk' in regards behavior when coming in contact with the Police. I learned from Law Enforcement that 'if you can keep someone talking long enough the truth will come out'.

Do NOT talk if you don't need to.

"Anything You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You": The Power of Silence in Legal Encounters  

The Miranda warning is a staple of American criminal justice: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law." Yet, despite its ubiquity in police procedurals and crime dramas, many people fail to grasp the full weight of these words—often to their own detriment.  

A recent case in Texas, where a young suspect allegedly confessed to a stabbing homicide by blurting out "I did it," followed by a later question to an officer ("Can I use self-defense?"), highlights a critical reality: what you say during an arrest or investigation can make or break your case. This incident, along with the broader conversations around "The Talk" that African American parents give their children about police interactions, underscores a fundamental legal truth: silence is often the safest strategy. 

The Texas Case: A Cautionary Tale  

Details surrounding the Texas stabbing death remain under investigation, but one thing is already clear: the suspect’s words may have severely compromised his legal position. His immediate admission—"I did it"—could be used as direct evidence of guilt. Later, his question about self-defense suggests he may have been attempting to justify his actions, but by then, the damage was likely already done.  

Why? Because spontaneous statements made under stress are rarely strategic. Law enforcement officers are trained to let suspects talk, knowing that the more someone speaks, the more likely they are to say something incriminating. As the old law enforcement adage goes: "If you can keep someone talking long enough, the truth will come out."  

In this case, the suspect’s words may have:  

-Waived his right to remain silent without legal counsel present.  

-Undermined a potential self-defense claim by making an outright admission before establishing context.  

-Given prosecutors ammunition to argue premeditation or lack of remorse.  

Had he remained silent and waited for an attorney, his legal team might have been able to construct a stronger defense—whether based on self-defense, diminished capacity, or other factors.  

"The Talk": Why Silence is Survival 

For many African American families, "The Talk" is a necessary rite of passage—a survival guide for navigating encounters with law enforcement. Unlike generic parental advice about respecting authority, "The Talk" emphasizes:  

-Keeping hands visible to avoid appearing threatening.  

- Remaining calm even in the face of aggression.  

- Speaking minimally, if at all.  

This advice isn’t rooted in disrespect for law enforcement but in a harsh reality: words can be twisted, and innocent statements can be misconstrued. The legal system does not always favor the accused, especially when biases, pressure, or fear come into play.  

Studies have shown that:  

- False confessions are a leading cause of wrongful convictions.  

- Minorities are disproportionately affected by coercive interrogation tactics.  

- Even innocent explanations can be used to imply guilt (e.g., "Why were you in that neighborhood?").  

In this context, silence isn’t just a legal right—it’s a shield.  

The Psychology of Confession: Why People Keep Talking  

Despite knowing their rights, many people still talk themselves into trouble. Why?  

1. Fear and Intimidation – Police interrogations are designed to be stressful, making people desperate to explain themselves.  

2. Misplaced Trust – Some believe that if they’re innocent, cooperating fully will help. But officers are not there to exonerate—they’re there to gather evidence.  

3. The Myth of Transparency – People assume their honesty will be obvious, but words can be taken out of context or used selectively in court.  

Even the Texas suspect’s question about self-defense demonstrates this: he may have thought he was clarifying his actions, but legally, he was potentially handing prosecutors a way to challenge his narrative later.  

Legal Strategy: When to Speak (and When Not To)  

The Fifth Amendment exists for a reason. While there are rare instances where speaking might help (e.g., providing an alibi to stop an arrest), the general rule is:  

DO NOT TALK IF YOU DON’T NEED TO. 

Instead:  

1. Politely invoke your right to remain silent. Say, "I am choosing to remain silent and would like an attorney."

2. Do not argue, explain, or justify. Anything beyond requesting a lawyer can be risky.  

3. Let your attorney do the talking. A lawyer can frame statements in a way that protects your rights.  

Conclusion: The Power of Silence  

The Texas case is a stark reminder that the justice system is adversarial—what you say will be used against you. Whether innocent or guilty, the safest course is often to say nothing until legal counsel is present.  

As "The Talk" teaches, survival in the legal system isn’t just about knowing your rights—it’s about having the discipline to use them. In a world where words can become weapons, silence is the ultimate defense.

#Texas #Stabbing #KarmeloAnthony #Crime #Homocide

4/17/25

Dollars For Killers


 OPINION

Dollars For Killers:

The kid who stabbed the other kid in the chest at a Texas track meet has raised so much money online he and his family bought a house and a car and living in a gated community.

The guy that shot the United Healthcare CEO raised so much money online they had to shut down the site.

They have already raised $238,000 for the ILLEGAL alien that got sent to El Salvador that Democrats are dying to get back, who also beat his wife. And a Senator from Maryland  never called the family of the murdered Mother of 5, and he had the audacity to use US tax dollars to fly to El Salvador to get him out - he FAILED thank goodness!

What kind of people out there are willing to send money to a Killer?

Oh, I forgot. Today the Mendez Brothers killed their parents in 1989. They got money and love letters. They have a parole hearing today. Scott Peterson killed his Pregnant Wife and apparently unborn song got money and love letters as well.

#ILLEGAL #GoFundMe #UnitedHealthCare #KarmeloAnthony #LuigiMangione #KilmarÁbregoGarcía #ScottPeterson #MenendezBrothers 

President Trump's housing director refers NY AG James to DOJ over reported mortgage fraud



President Trump's housing director refers NY AG James to DOJ over reported mortgage fraud

She claimed her DADDY was her HUSBAND for a home loan ...

#DOJ #LititiaJames #NewYork #James

4/16/25

Another REASON NOT to vote DEMOCRAT

 Another REASON NOT to vote DEMOCRAT:


There are Democrats that wanna go to El Salvador to check on the Welfare of the MS13 ILLEGAL ALIEN they want back ... 

The same people who want Men in Women’s sports ... 

The same people who want ABORTION up until the MOMENT of BIRTH PAID FOR BY THE GOVERNMENT.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, The Criminal ILLEGAL, is more important to Democrats than the Americans Killed by ILLEGALS.

The Radical Priorities of the Modern Democratic Party  

The Democratic Party has undergone a dramatic shift in recent years, embracing extreme and often unpopular positions that alienate mainstream Americans. Among these radical priorities are:  

-Demanding the return of deported MS-13 gang members—with some Democrats even considering traveling to El Salvador to check on their "welfare."  

-Pushing for biological men to compete in women’s sports, destroying fairness and opportunities for female athletes.  

- Advocating for abortion up until the moment of birth, funded by taxpayers.  

These positions reveal a party that has abandoned common sense, public safety, and moral decency in favor of fringe ideologies.  

Defending MS-13: Democrats’ Bizarre Concern for Violent Criminals

MS-13 is one of the most brutal criminal organizations in the Western Hemisphere. Known for gruesome murders, drug trafficking, and human smuggling, this gang has terrorized communities in both the U.S. and Central America. The Trump administration took strong action to dismantle MS-13 networks and deport illegal alien gang members—a move that made American streets safer.  

Yet, shockingly, some Democrats have expressed concern over the deportation of these violent criminals. Reports indicate that progressive lawmakers have even considered traveling to El Salvador to check on the "welfare" of deported MS-13 members. This is an outrageous misuse of time and resources.  

Why are Democrats more concerned about the well-being of violent gang members than the safety of American citizens?

Instead of focusing on securing the border or protecting U.S. communities, these politicians are bending over backward to cater to the far-left open-borders lobby. Their priorities are dangerously misplaced.  

Men in Women’s Sports: Erasing Female Athletes

Another radical policy pushed by Democrats is allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports. This absurdity has already led to countless instances where female athletes are forced to compete against bigger, stronger males—resulting in lost scholarships, championships, and opportunities.  

Examples of this injustice include:

- Lia Thomas, a biological male, dominating women’s swimming and taking titles from deserving female athletes.  

- High school girls being forced to compete against transgender athletes, putting them at a physical disadvantage.  

-Female athletes silenced for speaking out, labeled "transphobic" for wanting fair competition.  

Science and common sense confirm that men have inherent physical advantages over women in sports. Yet, Democrats continue to push policies that erase women’s achievements in the name of "inclusivity." 

Why should girls and women have to sacrifice their hard work, safety, and dreams to accommodate a radical gender ideology?

Republicans have fought to protect women’s sports with bills like Florida’s "Fairness in Women’s Sports Act," but Democrats at the federal level—including the Biden administration—have actively opposed such protections. Their agenda prioritizes political correctness over fairness and reality.  

Abortion Until Birth: The Party of Extreme Abortion

Perhaps the most morally indefensible position of the modern Democratic Party is its support for abortion up until the moment of birth—and even after, in some cases.  

Key facts about the Democratic abortion agenda:  

-They oppose bans on late-term abortion even though most Americans (including many Democrats) support restrictions after the first trimester.  

-They push for taxpayer-funded abortion forcing pro-life Americans to subsidize the killing of unborn children.  

-They block common-sense protections**, such as requiring medical care for babies born alive after failed abortions.  

Prominent Democrats, including Biden, Harris, and Pelosi, have repeatedly refused to support any limits on abortion. Some have even cheered states like New York and Virginia for passing laws allowing abortion up to birth.  

This is not "women’s healthcare"—it is infanticide.

Science confirms that unborn babies can feel pain by at least 15 weeks, yet Democrats fight to allow abortions well beyond that point. Their extremism is out of touch with the majority of Americans, who support reasonable restrictions.  

Conclusion: A Party Gone Mad

The Democratic Party’s priorities reveal a disturbing trend:  

1. They care more about violent criminals (MS-13) than American citizens.

2. They prioritize gender ideology over women’s rights and safety. 

#Immigration #ILLEGAL #migrants #MS13 #KilmarAbregoGarcia

3. They defend abortion extremism over the most vulnerable human lives.

These positions are not just radical—they are dangerous. Americans must reject this agenda and demand leaders who prioritize safety, fairness, and moral decency.  

The choice is clear: Do we want a nation that protects criminals, destroys women’s sports, and allows abortion up to birth? Or do we want a country that values law and order, fairness, and the sanctity of life?

The answer should be obvious.

#Illegals #Democrats #Voting #Elsalvador #KilmarAbregoGarcia

4/3/25

Democrats and Communists

 


Democrats and Communists Have Similarities Democrats Don't Want You To See and They Won't Acknowledge:

Kennedy was able to deal with Kruschchev and avoid WWIII. Reagan was able to deal with Gorbachev and avoid WWIII. Trump is trying to deal with Putin to avoid WWIII.

When you point out the similarities of the Communists and Democrats, Democrats act like you are wearing a tin foil hat and call you a 'conspiracy theorist'. History states. And most of the denials come from TEACHERS.


A reminder of Khrushchev comments September 29, 1959: THIS WAS Russian Prime Minister Nikita Khrushchev's ENTIRE QUOTE from that day:


"Your children's children will live under communism, You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands." "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."


Do you remember or know all of what Russia's Khrushchev said in 1959?


"How do you create a Socialist State?


There are 8 levels of control; read the following recipe:


1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people.


2) Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them.


3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.


4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.


5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government.


6) Education - Take control of what people read and listen to and take control of what children learn in school.


7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people.


8) Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor."

#Socialism #Communism #Russia #Democrats



3/31/25

Population Control

 


POPULATION CONTROL:


Bret Baier interviewed Elon Musk last week. He asked him "What keeps you up at night?" You would have thought the economy or foreign policy would be in the answer. He said 'DEPOPULATION' is his main concern. Interesting coming from a Man that has fathered 14 kids.


He talked about Japan and Taiwan. Their populations are decreasing and if things don't change those countries will have significant low populations 20 to 30 years from now.


This reminds me of what Bill Gates, Oprah Whinfrey, and the Rockefellers think. They think the world is OVER POPULATED. Bill Gates thinks that through vaccinations we can reduce the world population. Since the introduction of the COVID Vaccine the fertility of Women has DROPPED. Bill Gates was big on the Covid Vaccine that has eventually started causing miscarriages and infertility.

#birthrate #elonmusk #billgates

3/28/25

ELON MUSK HAS THE SKILLS AND STAFF TO MAKE THE CUTS!!!

 


If someone had a sign that said 'Hunter Biden Is Not My President' he or she would be called an IDIOT. Elon Musk is not our 'President'. We don't need to be told he is not 'yours'. The LEFT made this up. You don't get to vote for the PRESIDENT'S Advisors. The ADVISORS come with the ELECTIONS.

ELON MUSK HAS THE SKILLS AND STAFF TO MAKE THE CUTS!!!

3/24/25

How does rowing affect your heart, and is it different to running?



How does rowing affect your heart, and is it different to running?

What does the Department of Education really give Public Schools?


MY BAD ... I GOTTA EAT CROW...IT'S 13.7%

"About 13.7% or one in every seven dollars of public school funding during the 2021–22 school year. Local and state governments typically provide most school district funding, with the federal government providing the rest."

#DepartmentofEducation #DOE #education #DOGE

Politics and Pro-Wrestling Book by CHRISTOPHER. HART



Mia Love



"R.I.P. Mia Love. 

She was the 1st Black Republican Woman To Serve In The U.S. Congress From Utah. She Just Died From Complications From Brain Cancer At Age 49.

The LEFT Won't Recognize Her Because She Was A CONSERVATIVE. Democrats SUCK."

#Politics #MiaLove #Love #Mia #Utah


Former Utah Rep. Mia Love, first Black Republican woman in House, dies at 49

3/22/25

Democrats Think Childless Women Know Best About Kids

 COMMENTARY/OPINION


Since the creation of the Department of Education we have spent 3 Trillion Dollars on Education on the Federal Level alone. Reading and math levels have DROPPED.


ROI = Return On Investment


Ya know how Oprah gives out 'parenting' advice and doesn't have kids? 


"Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), earned a total compensation of over $540,000 in 2020, which included a salary of $543,562, including retirement and other deferred compensation."


She doesn't have any KIDS. And she tells America what we should be doing with the KIDS.


KAMALA HARRIS has no KIDS.



Why do DEMOCRATS CREATE GOLDEN COWS out of COWS to lead the KIDS that didn't get aborted? Do they hate KIDS? They got the worst people dealing with KIDS, but they hate Private Schools, Religious Schools, Charter Schools, and Home Schooling ... and those KIDS do better.


It's not about RETURN ON INVESTMENT. They just want their PUBLIC BUCK$.

#KamalaHarris #Oprah #Kamala #RandiWeingarten

This is why Home Schooling has become more popular.  PARENTS KNOW BETTER THAN NON-PARENTS. They Democrats don’t want to teach your KIDS. They want to INDOCTRINATE your KIDS ... and KEEP THAT MONEY.




"Home Schooled Kids out perform public school kids. Instead of promoting home schooling they want to regulate it. Everything about the Democratic Party is about control and power. They want to regulate everything except on thing, ABORTION...Funded with YOUR MONEY ON DEMAND. Everything else they want to regulate."

New homeschooling bill moves forward in Illinois legislature

#Illinois #Education #Politics #HomeSchool