Evacuation ordered on Utah State campus amid preparations for Turning Point USA event

Evacuation ordered on Utah State campus amid preparations for Turning Point USA event

---

by Megan Brugger, KUTV

Tue, September 30, 2025 at 2:52 PM

Updated Tue, September 30, 2025 at 3:57 PM

#CharlieKirk #Charlie #Kirk #TurningPoint

The Government Shutdown Will Be The Democrats' Fault

 

The Government is about to shut down. It basically will shut down over health care.

Democrats are demanding free health care for ILLEGALS. YOU gotta pay.

Since the passing of Obamacare premiums have increased 400%. We have 50% less Doctors. We have 50% less Nurses. We have 50% less Hospitals. We also have 50% less Insurance Companies. Doctors are forced to see less patients because it takes 1 hour and 48 minutes to see and CODE a patient. Less patients means less care.

Democrats are simply in the pockets of big pharma. They don't care about you.

#GovernmentShutDown #Obamacare

A System in Crisis: The High Stakes of Healthcare in the Government Shutdown Standoff

As the specter of a government shutdown looms, the political battle lines are drawn with familiar, fiery rhetoric. At the heart of the impasse, one side argues, is an issue of fundamental fairness and a healthcare system pushed to the breaking point. The central claim is stark: Democrats are holding the government hostage to demand free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, a burden that would fall squarely on the shoulders of American taxpayers. This charge, however, is merely the flashpoint in a much larger narrative about the perceived catastrophic failure of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, and the systemic decay its critics believe it has caused.

The accusation that Democrats are advocating for "free health care for ILLEGALS" is a potent political weapon. It taps into deep-seated concerns about immigration, national resources, and fiscal responsibility. The argument posits that while American citizens struggle with rising costs, it is an affront to prioritize non-citizens who have entered the country unlawfully. This framing casts the debate not just as a policy disagreement, but as a matter of national loyalty and equitable distribution of public funds. Proponents of this view argue that providing such benefits acts as a "pull factor," encouraging more illegal immigration and further straining an already fragile system. In the high-stakes game of a government shutdown, this issue becomes a non-negotiable red line for those who see it as a symbol of misplaced priorities.

To understand the depth of this resistance, one must look at the broader context of the post-Obamacare landscape as described by its critics. The claim that "since the passing of Obamacare premiums have increased 400%" is a dramatic indictment. While the exact percentage can be debated depending on the timeframe and plan type (individual market vs. employer-sponsored), it is true that many Americans, particularly those buying insurance on their own, have experienced significant premium increases since the law's implementation. Critics argue that the ACA’s essential health benefits requirements and regulations, while well-intentioned to provide comprehensive coverage, eliminated cheaper, catastrophic plans and drove up costs for healthier individuals. This has led to a scenario where, for some, insurance has become less affordable than before the law was passed, despite subsidies designed to help lower-income households.

The statistics presented about a 50% reduction in doctors, nurses, hospitals, and insurance companies paint a picture of a medical industry in precipitous decline. These figures are significant exaggerations of reality but reflect a genuine sense of contraction and strain. While the number of licensed physicians and registered nurses in the U.S. has actually increased in absolute terms since 2010, the perception of a shortage is not unfounded. The issue is often one of distribution (rural areas have far fewer providers) and burnout. The ACA aimed to insure millions more people, increasing demand for services without a corresponding immediate increase in supply of providers, leading to longer wait times and the feeling of a system stretched thin.

The claim about a 50% reduction in hospitals is not supported by data from the American Hospital Association, which shows a much more gradual and modest decline, primarily among rural facilities, a trend predating the ACA. Similarly, the claim about insurance companies is nuanced. While consolidation has occurred, and some smaller insurers left the marketplaces, the major players have largely remained. The point, however, is that critics see a system that is less competitive and more bureaucratic.

Perhaps the most insightful claim from a frontline perspective is that "doctors are forced to see less patients because it takes 1 hour and 48 minutes to see and CODE a patient." This gets to the heart of a critical issue in modern medicine: administrative burden. The coding referred to is the complex system of ICD-10 codes used for billing insurance companies. The ACA, with its emphasis on electronic health records and quality metrics, significantly increased this paperwork burden. Doctors and their staff spend immense amounts of time documenting every aspect of a patient visit to justify billing and avoid audits, rather than focusing purely on patient care. This administrative bloat leads to physician burnout and reduces the number of patients a practice can see in a day. The consequence, as stated, is that "less patients means less care," creating access problems even for those who have insurance.

The final, sweeping accusation is that "Democrats are simply in the pockets of big pharma." This sentiment fuels the belief that the entire political debate is corrupt. The pharmaceutical industry does indeed wield enormous lobbying power and contributes significant funds to both political parties, though often in different proportions depending on the election cycle. The failure to effectively address soaring drug costs through major legislation has reinforced the view for many that politicians are beholden to special interests rather than the constituents they serve. In this narrative, the push for policies like expanding healthcare coverage to undocumented immigrants is not about compassion but about funneling more public money into a system controlled by powerful corporate entities.

In conclusion, the government shutdown threat over healthcare is not a simple political stunt. It is the eruption of long-simmering grievances about the direction of American healthcare. For the critics of the Affordable Care Act, the system is characterized by skyrocketing costs, a shrinking and overburdened provider network, and a political class that prioritizes non-citizens and corporate interests over struggling American families. Whether one agrees with this assessment or not, it represents a powerful and deeply held worldview that continues to shape the nation’s most contentious policy debates. The battle over a government shutdown is merely the latest symptom of a much deeper diagnosis of a system believed by many to be in critical condition.

Jimmy Kimmel Won't Be Everywhere

 

They won't be seeing Jimmy [WHO] Kimmel ...

Copied and Pasted - I Stole It ...

"Sinclair owns or operates over 30 ABC affiliate stations, including well-known examples like WJLA-TV in Washington, D.C., KATV in Little Rock, AR, and WEAR-TV in Pensacola, FL. The exact number of Sinclair's ABC affiliates is 38, with the company owning the largest number of ABC affiliate stations of any station group. 

Here are some of the ABC stations owned or operated by Sinclair: 

WJLA-TV: (Washington, D.C.)

KATV: (Little Rock, AR)

WBMA-LD: (Birmingham, AL)

WEAR-TV: (Pensacola, FL)

KRCR-TV: (Redding, CA)

KAEF-TV: (Eureka, CA)

WGXA: (Macon, GA)

WSYX: (Columbus, OH)

Key details:

Largest Owner: Sinclair is the largest owner of ABC affiliates in the United States, according to The Hollywood Reporter. 

Impact: Sinclair's large holdings mean they are a major player in the carriage of ABC Network programming, and the company has made news recently for pre-empting Jimmy Kimmel's show on its ABC affiliates."

#ABC #JimmyKimmel #Disney

There Is No Age Issue For Donald Trump

 

There Is No Age Issue For Donald Trump

"This man is 79 years old.

Most men his age are slowing down, retiring, or living out their days in comfort.

But not him.

He works until two in the morning, often running on only four hours of sleep.

While others his age are enjoying their golden years, he is carrying the weight of an entire nation on his shoulders.

He doesn’t take a salary.

Every single quarter, he gives it away to causes that serve the American people.

He could be cashing in for billions, because let’s be honest, he already proved he knows how to build, create, and succeed in business.

He had the empire.

He had the fame.

He had the wealth.

And he walked away from it all.

Why?

Because he loves this country more than he loves comfort.

Because he sees freedom slipping away.

Because he sees liberty under attack.

Because he sees YOU and ME, ordinary Americans, being ignored, silenced, and pushed aside by the elites who only care about themselves.

So he makes the choice most people wouldn’t dare to make.

He leaves behind his private life, his family’s quiet peace, his businesses, and even his own safety.

He steps into the storm.

And since that moment, he endures endless attacks, fake investigations, lies, betrayals, and hatred from those who despise the idea of a President who actually fights for the people instead of the swamp.

And yet, he never quits.

He never bends the knee to the globalists, the media, or the political class.

He stands firm, not just for his own name, but for the promise of America itself.

He fights for secure borders.

He is winning on trade.

He fights to bring back jobs, rebuild manufacturing, and restore strength to our military.

He fights to give Americans hope again.

And still today, while others rest, he works late into the night.

He sacrifices sleep, comfort, and ease because his mission isn’t finished.

His mission is to protect freedom.

His mission is to secure liberty.

His mission is to put America first.

This is not the story of an ordinary politician.

This is the story of a man chosen for this moment in history.

His name is Donald J. Trump.

He is the 45th and 47th President of the United States.

And no matter how hard they try, no matter what they throw at him, no matter how many obstacles they place in his path, he remains OUR President.

Thank God he is in the White House.

Thank God we have a fighter.

Thank God we have Donald J. Trump!"

#Trump #Biden

There Is No Age Issue For Donald Trump as President

In the relentless churn of the 2024 election cycle, one narrative has been pushed with particular vigor by the left and its media allies: the age and fitness of the candidates. This focus, however, is applied with a glaring and politically motivated double standard. While questions about President Joe Biden’s cognitive sharpness are met with defensiveness or dismissed as ageism, similar inquiries about Donald Trump are amplified into a central campaign issue. The truth that this narrative obscures is a simple one: there is no meaningful age issue for Donald Trump. The relevant metric is not the number of years one has lived, but the vitality, energy, and clarity of thought one possesses—qualities Trump demonstrates in abundance.

To compare the public presentations of Donald Trump and Joe Biden is to witness a study in contrasts that has nothing to do with birth certificates. President Biden often appears hesitant, frequently relying on notecards for simple interactions and struggling with coherence in unscripted moments. His physical gait is cautious, and his energy level seems deliberately managed. These are observations, not insults; they are legitimate concerns about the capacity to execute the most demanding job on earth.

Donald Trump, meanwhile, projects an image of relentless vigor. His rallies are marathon events, often lasting well over an hour, filled with vigorous gesticulation and a forceful, extemporaneous speaking style. He engages in rapid-fire debates, navigates complex legal and political challenges simultaneously, and maintains a schedule that would exhaust many individuals half his age. This is not the picture of a man diminished by time, but of a fighter operating at the peak of his powers. The liberal fixation on his age is a transparent attempt to find a neutral-sounding cudgel to beat him with, precisely because they cannot argue against the successes of his first term or the potency of his America First message.

The conservative case for Trump has never been about the man’s age, but about the enduring power of his ideas and his record. Voters are not looking for a youthful face; they are looking for a leader who will restore strength at home and abroad. They remember the Trump administration not through a filter of birthdays, but through tangible results: a booming pre-pandemic economy, energy independence, secure borders, and a world where American adversaries thought twice before testing our resolve. These are the issues that matter. Age is a superficial distraction from the substantive debate over policy direction. Do we want a return to the failed policies of the Obama-Biden era, which have led to inflation, open borders, and global instability, or do we want a return to the proven policies that worked for all Americans?

Furthermore, the conservative perspective values wisdom and experience, assets that are honed over a lifetime. Donald Trump’s age brings with it a wealth of experience from outside the political swamp. He is a businessman, a negotiator, and a political outsider who successfully took on the Washington establishment. This seasoned perspective is an asset, not a liability. He is not a career politician who has spent decades being shaped by the corrupting influences of Capitol Hill; he is a patriot who entered public life later, with a fully formed worldview focused on American interests. His age signifies a lifetime of achievement and a freedom from the need to conform to political correctness—a quality that resonates with millions of Americans tired of cookie-cutter politicians.

Ultimately, the “age issue” is a hollow construct, a last resort for a political movement that finds itself on the wrong side of every policy debate that matters to everyday Americans. When they talk about kitchen-table issues—the cost of groceries, the safety of their neighborhoods, the quality of their children’s education—the age of the candidate is irrelevant. What is relevant is the candidate’s vision, his track record, and his fighting spirit.

The American people are wise enough to see through this media-manufactured controversy. They can distinguish between chronological age and effective leadership. They see a current president who seems weary and overwhelmed by the world, and they see a former president bursting with the energy and determination to fix the problems that have multiplied in his absence. The question in 2024 is not who is older or younger; the question is who is stronger, who is sharper, and who has the will to lead. On every count that truly matters, Donald Trump proves that there is no age issue—only a leadership issue, and he is the clear and obvious solution.

Beyond the Guilt: A Conservative Call for Principled Action in a World Scarred by Slavery

 

Beyond the Guilt: A Conservative Call for Principled Action in a World Scarred by Slavery

The explosive online declaration, "EVERY COUNTRY HAS HAD SLAVERY!!! SOME STILL DO!!! SHOULD WE CONQUER THE WORLD?!?!" is more than just internet hyperbole. It is a raw, unfiltered expression of a sentiment felt by many who observe the current state of our national discourse. It reflects a deep frustration with a narrative that seems to singularly focus on America’s historical sins while ignoring both the global context of human bondage and the pressing evils that persist today. From a conservative perspective, this isn’t a call for apathy, but for a more clear-eyed, principled, and effective approach to human dignity—one rooted in truth, national strength, and the power of our example, not self-flagellating conquest.

The historical facts presented are undeniable and crucial for an honest conversation. The institution of slavery was not an American invention; it is a tragic, near-universal chapter in human history. The detailed account of Korea’s *nobi* system, which endured for over a millennium with up to 40% of the population enslaved, is a stark reminder. So too are the ancient slave markets of Mesopotamia, the prolonged horrors of the Arab slave trade, and the entrenched serfdom of Eastern Europe. This global perspective is not, as some might charge, an attempt to "whatabout" our own history or minimize the profound injustice of transatlantic chattel slavery. Rather, it is a necessary corrective to a modern progressive narrative that paints America as uniquely evil.

This narrative is not only ahistorical but also counterproductive. By isolating American history as a unique moral catastrophe, it fosters national self-loathing and division. It teaches our children to see their country’s founding not as a flawed but revolutionary step toward liberty, but as an irredeemable original sin. This mindset paralyzes us. It suggests that our nation is so inherently corrupt that it must be fundamentally deconstructed, rather than proudfully improved upon. Conservatism, in contrast, understands that a nation, like an individual, cannot strive for a better future if it is taught to despise its past. Acknowledging the full, global context of slavery allows us to properly contextualize our own history—to condemn the evil unequivocally while still honoring the incredible progress and the heroes who fought to end it.

The second part of the statement—"SOME STILL DO!!!"—points us toward where our moral outrage should be focused today: on present-tense evil. The situation in Mauritania is a chilling testament to the fact that slavery is not merely a historical relic. Despite being officially outlawed, hereditary slavery persists with the complicity of the state. Human beings are still born into bondage, considered property, and trapped by a brutal caste system. This is not a legacy issue; it is a current, ongoing atrocity.

Herein lies the conservative answer to "SHOULD WE CONQUER THE WORLD?!" The answer is a resounding no. Conquest and neo-colonialism are not the tools of a strong and confident nation; they are the failed strategies of empires. They drain national treasure, cost American lives, and often create more instability and suffering. The conservative foreign policy approach is not one of isolationism, but of principled realism and leadership.

So what does that leadership look like in the face of modern slavery?

First, it requires a foreign policy driven by moral clarity, not moral relativism. We must use our immense diplomatic power to name and shame regimes like Mauritania. This means tying foreign aid, trade agreements, and international standing to verifiable, measurable progress in eradicating these practices. Our voice on the world stage must be a consistent and powerful advocate for human liberty.

Second, we must leverage our economic might. Sanctions targeted specifically at the elites and officials who benefit from or turn a blind eye to modern slavery can be a powerful tool. We can lead international coalitions to freeze assets and restrict travel for those complicit in these crimes.

Third, and most importantly, we must lead by the power of our example. America’s greatest export is not its military might but its ideal of liberty. We combat global slavery by being a shining city on a hill—a testament to what a free, prosperous, and multi-ethnic society can achieve. This means strengthening our own nation at home: securing our borders to fight human trafficking networks that operate globally, promoting economic policies that create prosperity and lift all boats, and upholding the rule of law which is the ultimate bulwark against tyranny.

A nation consumed with deconstructing itself, debating whether its core principles are a lie, and teaching its citizens to be ashamed of their heritage has no moral authority to lead anyone. A nation that is confident in its values, proud of its progress, and steadfast in its commitment to justice and liberty does.

The online cry of frustration is understandable. It rejects a guilt-based narrative that seeks to paralyze America in the past. But conservatism does not reject the fight for human dignity; it seeks to reframe it on terms that are both honest and effective. We must study the full history of slavery to understand the dark depths of human nature, not to score points. We must confront modern slavery with the fierce resolve of a nation that believes in its own foundational ideals. Our mission is not to conquer the world, but to lead it—through strength, principle, and the unwavering belief that the promise of freedom is the most powerful force for good this world has ever known. That is a cause worthy of a great nation.

EVERY COUNTRY HAS HAD SLAVERY!!! SOME STILL DO!!! SHOULD WE CONQUER THE WORLD?!?!

Which country had the longest slavery in the world?

"While many cultures and civilizations have long histories of slavery, Korea is often cited for having one of the longest, most enduring, and institutionally embedded systems of slavery, with an unbroken chain lasting for centuries, characterized by the nobi class. The institution of slavery in Korea existed for well over a thousand years, with a significant portion of the population being enslaved at various times, only gradually abolished by the late 19th century. 

Key aspects of Korean slavery:

A distinct class system: Slavery was a well-defined and accepted social status for centuries, with slaves (nobi) being considered property that could be bought, sold, inherited, and gifted. 

Long-term institution: Unlike some other forms of forced labor, the system of Korean slavery had a remarkably long and stable existence, with scholars referring to it as an "unbroken chain". 

Economic significance: The economy in Chosŏn Korea was heavily dependent on enslaved labor, with the slave population reaching as high as 30-40% of the total population at certain times. 

Late abolition: While slavery was present in various forms from antiquity, the institution persisted through the Koryŏ and Chosŏn dynasties, with abolition finally occurring in the late 19th century, particularly in 1894. 

Other contexts for lengthy histories of slavery:

Ancient Civilizations: The concept of slavery is seen to have emerged with the very first civilizations, such as those in Mesopotamia around 3500 BC. 

Middle East/North Africa: The Red Sea slave trade, which moved Africans into the Arab world, was a very long-enduring trade, lasting from antiquity until the mid-20th century. 

Eastern Europe: Serfdom, a form of tied labor similar to slavery, was a long-standing institution in Eastern Europe, especially in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Russia, lasting for several centuries."

Can You Still Buy A Slave In Africa?

"No [Not Legally], it is not possible to legally buy a person in Mauritania or anywhere else in the world, as slavery is banned everywhere. However, modern slavery, particularly hereditary or descent-based slavery, is a persistent and entrenched issue in Mauritania despite official bans. 

Legality vs. reality in Mauritania

Illegal status: Slavery was officially abolished in Mauritania in 1981, the last country in the world to do so. It has since been criminalized multiple times, most recently in 2015, with laws imposing prison sentences on slaveholders.

Lack of enforcement: Despite these laws, enforcement is notoriously poor, and perpetrators are rarely prosecuted. Activists report that government officials often deny the existence of slavery and sometimes even encourage victims to withdraw their complaints.

Persistent practice: Human rights organizations and the U.S. State Department confirm that the practice continues, especially in remote areas. It primarily affects the Haratine ethnic group, whose slave status has been passed down for generations. 

How modern slavery functions in Mauritania

Unlike historic open-air slave markets, the practice today is more hidden and operates within a deep-seated caste system. 

Hereditary control: People are typically born into slavery and considered the property of their "masters" for life. This status is passed down from mother to child.

Economic dependence: Many who are freed remain dependent on their former masters due to extreme poverty, lack of education, and widespread discrimination.

Trafficking and exploitation: Human trafficking also occurs, with reports of traffickers exploiting victims for forced labor or sexual exploitation. 

International recognition and condemnation

International reports consistently place Mauritania among the countries with the highest prevalence of modern slavery.

The U.S. State Department and other international bodies have repeatedly called for stronger action and criticized Mauritanian officials for their complicity and lack of political will to end the practice."

#Slavery #Africa

Charlie Kirk suspect linked to crime scene by DNA, says FBI chief

Charlie Kirk suspect linked to crime scene by DNA, says FBI chief

#CharlieKirk #KashPatel #Utah

What Is TranTifa?

 What Is TranTifa?

"Trantifa" is a pejorative term used by some, particularly in a controversial May 2025 protest, to describe a pro-LGBTQ+ and pro-trans rights group that confronted counter-protesters with a conservative Christian group at Seattle's City Hall. This confrontation resulted in tensions, clashes with police, and arrests, and the term has been associated with efforts to label these pro-LGBTQ+ groups negatively. 

#Trans #TranTifa

The Context of "Trantifa" 

"Trantifa" as a derogatory term: 

The term appears to be a portmanteau of "trans" and "Antifa," used to associate trans rights advocates with the loosely organized anti-fascist movement.

• May 2025 Seattle Protests: 

  In May 2025, a conservative Christian group rallied at Seattle City Hall, leading to a confrontation with pro-LGBTQ+ counter-protesters who were concerned about their views on trans rights and abortion.
• Clashes and arrests: 

  The situation escalated, resulting in clashes and 8 arrests, with some pro-LGBTQ+ counter-protesters expressing concern about being targeted by police, according to one report.
• FBI investigation: 

  The FBI began investigating allegations of targeted violence against religious groups following the protests.

Key takeaways 

The term "trantifa" was not a self-applied name but was used by some to frame a group of pro-trans rights protesters in Seattle.

• The term emerged during a May 2025 demonstration at Seattle City Hall involving counter-protesters and a conservative Christian group, leading to arrests and a federal investigation.

A religious group is set to protest outside Seattle City Hall. Here's why

#Trans #Antifa #Trantifa

What Is Fascism?

 WHAT IS FASCISM?

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology defined by a dictatorial leader, forced suppression of opposition, militarism, and a strong belief in a natural social hierarchy. It rose to prominence in 20th-century Europe and is fundamentally opposed to democratic liberalism, communism, and socialism. 

Core characteristics of fascism

While different fascist movements throughout history have had their own nuances, historians and scholars have identified several key shared characteristics: 

Ultrananationalism and the "rebirth" myth: Fascism emphasizes extreme nationalism, often tied to a "palingenetic" myth of national rebirth. This involves presenting a narrative of the nation's past greatness, claiming it has fallen into a state of decline or decadence, and promising to restore it to glory.

• Authoritarian and dictatorial leadership: Fascist states are typically one-party, totalitarian states with power centralized under a single, charismatic leader. A personality cult is often built around this leader, who is presented as embodying the will of the nation.
• Militarism and violence: Fascism glorifies military power and warfare as a means of national rejuvenation and expansion. Violence is often celebrated as a redemptive or purifying force and is used to suppress opposition and advance national goals.
• Suppression of opposition: Fascist regimes systematically suppress all forms of opposition, including political opponents, dissenters, and minorities. They control the media and use violence and intimidation to eliminate any perceived threats to national unity.
• Scapegoating: Fascist movements commonly use scapegoats to unite the population against a perceived enemy, often blaming specific groups (such as ethnic or racial minorities, immigrants, or political opponents) for the nation's problems.
• Hierarchical social structure: Fascism promotes the idea of an inescapable social hierarchy and views human inequality as natural. It demands that individual interests and rights be subordinated to the perceived good of the nation or race.
• State-directed economy: Fascism operates a dirigiste economy, where the state plays a strong, directive role in economic interventions. While not abolishing private property like communism, it forces cooperation between businesses and workers to serve nationalistic goals and achieve economic self-sufficiency (autarky). 
• Key examples in history

• Benito Mussolini's Italy: The term "fascism" comes from the Italian fascio (bundle), referencing the ancient Roman symbol of authority, the fasces. Mussolini founded the National Fascist Party in 1921 and seized power through the March on Rome in 1922.
• Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany: Nazism is a radical, racially-focused variant of fascism that was centered on the concept of Aryan supremacy. The Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler, rose to power in 1933 and pursued a genocidal and imperialistic agenda.
• Francisco Franco's Spain: With support from fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, Franco's fascist forces defeated a democratically elected government in the Spanish Civil War. 
• Evolving interpretations and modern usage

Since World War II, few parties openly use the term "fascist," but it is often used pejoratively by political opponents. The term can be difficult to define precisely, and modern-day movements that draw inspiration from historical fascism are often referred to as "neo-fascist". These movements often use similar tactics, such as extreme nationalism, scapegoating, and anti-immigrant rhetoric. 

#Fascism #Fascist

The First 48

#CharlieKirk

The Weapon That Allegedly Killed Charlie Kirk

 

The Weapon That Allegedly Killed Charlie Kirk

They say the weapon found was a bolt action rifle. That means the shooter meant to be ACCURATE ... From 200 to 250 yards away ... and then got away ... TMZ was cheering ... Teachers have been cheering ... There are some sick people out there. If I speak my true mind now, I won't be here posting tomorrow. 

If you believe in Faith and Country and don't know who Charlie Kirk was, go look him up and you may LEARN SOMETHING.

#CharlieKirk #Assassination

RECENT HIGH PROFILE KILLING

 

RECENT HIGH PROFILE KILLING:

Ya know, you gotta be a cold hearted individual to stab someone. You have to do angry you feel the need to be UP CLOSE AND INTIMATE TO KILL. THAT TAKE 'ANGER' ...

To shoot someone with a high powered bolt action rifle (.308, .243, .302, 30-06 -forgive me if I made mistakes) that takes SERIOUS ANGER as well. Those are made to knock down large game animals weighing 800lbs or heavier from up to 900 yards or better away. If you are shot with THAT the shooter intended for you to be DOA. Charlie Kirk was DOA.

In other words, there is EVIL out there.

BTW, The CHARLIE KIRK SHOW just started ... Salem News Network

#CharlieKirk #CharlotteStabbing #Ukraine

Personal Thoughts on Charlie Kirk

 

Personal Thoughts on 

Charlie Kirk

"They say the weapon found was a bolt action rifle. That means the shooter meant to be ACCURATE ... From 200 to 250 yards away ... and then got away ... TMZ was cheering ... Teachers have been cheering ... There are some sick people out there. If I speak my true mind now, I won't be here posting tomorrow."

"If you believe in Faith and Country and don't know who Charlie Kirk was, go look him up and you may LEARN SOMETHING."

"The Assassination of Charlie Kirk is as big as the Assassination of the Kennedys. The Kennedys didn't have MILLIONS of followers. Charlie Kirk wasn't old enough to be President. However his name was in the mention of being President 3 to 4 terms from now. The Political LEFT and Communists go after the YOUTH. Kirk was putting a wrench in their game and they weren't having it. They want to indoctrinate kids to hate their country, not serve their country, and hate how God created you and go TRANS. Some of you claim to be Christians and hate Charlie Kirk, but LOVED Joe Biden because you were told "He's a Racist" ... STUPID!!!"

#CharlieKirk #Charlie #Kirk #TurningPointUSA

Chilling Video Shows Ukrainian Refugee Stabbed To Death On American Train

#Crime #Stabbing

Tom Rosenbauer on How to Fish Small Streams

#Survival #Fishing #Camping #Prepping

'Breakfast Club' hosts back Snoop Dogg raising concern over LGBTQ themes in kids' movies

Snoop Dogg said he was caught off guard after grandson asked him how two women could have a baby in animated film 'Lightyear'

#LGBTQ #SnoopDogg #LightYear #BreakfastClub

El Mayo, the infamous Mexican drug lord, pleads guilty to drug trafficking charges

The plea agreement orders him to forfeit $15 billion.

#Elmayo #DrugLord #Mexico #Drugs #PamBondi #AG

DO NOT MESS WITH PAM!!!

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Takes Steps to End Cashless Bail to Protect Americans

The White House

August 25, 2025

Hulk Hogan may have died as a result of medical malpractice: report

#HulkHogan #Health #MedicalMalpractice

The Unsettling Report: Examining the Claim That Hulk Hogan May Have Died From Medical Malpractice

The name Hulk Hogan is synonymous with professional wrestling. For decades, the red and yellow bandana, the rippling 24-inch pythons, and the thunderous leg drop have been iconic symbols of sports entertainment. So, when a headline flashes claiming "Hulk Hogan may have died as a result of medical malpractice," it triggers a moment of profound shock and confusion. Readers are left with a whirlwind of questions: Is the Hulkster really gone? How? And what does this mean?

However, it is crucial to immediately address the core fact of this report: **Hulk Hogan is alive.** The widespread confusion stems from a sensational and, frankly, irresponsible headline based on a hypothetical scenario presented in a legal document. This incident is not an obituary but a fascinating, albeit alarming, case study into the worlds of law, medicine, celebrity, and media literacy.

The Origin of the Story: A Legal "What If"

The report did not emerge from a news investigation into a recent death. Instead, it originated from a Florida courtroom, where Hulk Hogan (real name Terry Gene Bollea) is embroiled in an ongoing lawsuit against a prominent medical facility and the team of doctors who performed his numerous back surgeries.

Hogan’s medical history is no secret. Years of taking devastating bumps in the wrestling ring—from body slams on the concrete floor to falls from the top rope—left his spine severely damaged. He underwent multiple spinal surgeries, including a dangerous spinal fusion procedure, to address chronic pain and nerve damage. While these surgeries initially offered hope, Hogan claims they ultimately led to catastrophic complications, including a severe staph infection that required additional emergency operations and left him in debilitating pain, arguably worse than his original condition.

His lawsuit alleges gross medical malpractice. The legal claim suggests the surgeons were negligent, performed unnecessary procedures, and failed to manage post-operative care correctly, leading to his current suffering.

So, where does the "death" claim come from? In a recent court filing, Hogan’s legal team included a statement from a retained medical expert. To establish the severity of the alleged malpractice, the expert witness was required to outline the potential risks of the procedures Hogan underwent. In doing so, the expert stated that the complications Hogan suffered—specifically the life-threatening staph infection that entered his bloodstream—could have, under slightly different circumstances, proved fatal.

This is a standard, though powerful, legal strategy. It’s designed to illustrate to a jury the gravity of the alleged negligence. The argument isn't that Hogan died; it's that the doctors' actions put him in a situation where death was a very real and possible outcome. The headline "Hulk Hogan may have died" is a literal but decontextualized interpretation of this legal argument, stripped of its hypothetical and illustrative purpose.

The Real Story: A Living Lawsuit, Not a Death

The true story here is not Hogan's death, but his ongoing fight for justice and his battle with chronic pain. In numerous interviews, Hogan has described the immense physical and emotional toll of his failed surgeries. He has spoken about being bedridden, dependent on painkillers, and struggling with depression. For a man who built a career on his superhuman physique and energy, this loss of physical autonomy has been devastating.

His lawsuit seeks millions in damages, not just for the medical bills and lost income, but for the immense pain and suffering he has endured. The case hinges on proving that the standard of care fell dramatically short and that the surgeons' actions were the direct cause of his worsened condition.

The "death" claim, while factually inaccurate as an event, serves to highlight the high stakes of this litigation. It underscores the plaintiff's position that this was not a simple case of a surgery not working as planned, but one of reckless endangerment that skirted the edge of tragedy.

Why the Confusion? The Media Literacy Problem

This incident is a textbook example of how information, particularly from complex fields like law and medicine, can be distorted in the modern media ecosystem. The journey from a nuanced legal document to a shocking viral headline follows a predictable path:

1. The Legal Filing: A medical expert states, "The septicemia presented a serious risk of death."

2. The Legal Summary: A legal blogger writes, "Expert: Hogan's infection could have been fatal."

3. The Clickbait Headline: An aggregator site publishes, "Hulk Hogan Could Have Died From Malpractice, Says Expert."

4. The Viral Misinterpretation: On social media, this morphs into "Report: Hulk Hogan Died from Malpractice."

At each step, context is lost. The speculative "could have" is replaced with the definitive "may have," and finally, in the minds of quick-scrolling readers, it becomes "did." This process is accelerated by the immense fame of the subject. A shocking headline about a beloved global icon generates clicks, engagement, and ad revenue at an astonishing rate, often at the expense of accuracy.

For the public, it’s a stark reminder to practice critical media consumption. When encountering an alarming headline, especially from a non-traditional news source, it is essential to:

Check the Date: Is this news from today or years ago?

Check the Source: Is it a reputable news outlet or a clickbait farm?

Read Beyond the Headline: The full article often contains the crucial context that the headline omits.

Seek Corroboration: See if major, established news organizations are reporting the same story.

The Bigger Picture: Medical Malpractice and Patient Advocacy

While Hulk Hogan’s case is unique due to his celebrity status, the underlying issue is tragically common. Medical errors are a leading cause of death worldwide. Patients place immense trust in their healthcare providers, and when that trust is broken through negligence, the consequences can be life-altering, or indeed, fatal.

Hogan’s very public lawsuit brings attention to the silent struggles of countless patients who suffer from surgical complications, misdiagnoses, and post-operative neglect. His platform gives a voice to those who lack the resources to wage a protracted legal battle against powerful medical institutions. It sparks a necessary public conversation about patient rights, informed consent, and the systems of accountability within healthcare.

His case is a powerful reminder for all patients to be their own advocates: to ask tough questions, to seek second opinions for major procedures, and to fully understand the risks and benefits of any medical intervention.

Conclusion: The Leg Drop That Didn't Happen

The report of Hulk Hogan's death was greatly exaggerated, to borrow from Mark Twain. The Hulkster is still with us, though fighting a painful and difficult battle far from the roar of the crowd. The headline, while false, serves as a gateway to a more substantive and important story about the real and serious consequences of alleged medical malpractice.

It is a story about the legal system working as intended—allowing individuals to seek redress for profound harm—playing out in the public eye. It is also a cautionary tale about the speed at which misinformation can travel in the digital age. Ultimately, the legacy of this report should not be a mistaken belief in Hogan’s passing, but a heightened awareness of the critical importance of medical accountability and the need for careful, thoughtful consumption of the information that floods our screens every day. What remains is not a ghost, but a man seeking justice, and a public hopefully a little wiser about the headlines they choose to believe.