Zohran Mamdani
Deep Dive
Intersectional Communist Zohran Mamdani Shows Democrats Can't Quit Obamaism | Opinion
Antifada - A Call Of Violence Against Jews - He Won't Deny It
"Intifada" is an Arabic word meaning "uprising" or "shaking off." In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it refers to periods of Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation. The term is most often associated with two major uprisings: the First Intifada (1987-1993) and the Second Intifada (2000-2005).
INDEPENDENT REVIEW
Zohran Mamdani: The Polished Radical Bridging Theory and Praxis in Queens
Zohran Mamdani isn't your stereotypical image of a New York State legislator. He’s a Rhodes Scholar with a master's from Oxford, the son of globally renowned academics, fluent and articulate, yet he represents Queens' 36th Assembly District not as a centrist Democrat, but as a self-proclaimed socialist with views firmly rooted in anti-capitalist and Marxist analysis. Labeling him simplistically as a "Communist" often misses the nuance of his ideology and the driving forces behind it. To understand who Mamdani "really is" and why he holds these views requires delving into his unique background, intellectual inheritance, lived experiences, and the specific political moment that propelled him into office.
Who He Is: A Tapestry of Heritage, Privilege, and Radicalization
1. The Weight of Legacy: Born in 1991, Mamdani is the son of Mahmood Mamdani, the eminent Ugandan-Tanzanian-Indian political scientist and anthropologist known for works like "Good Muslim, Bad Muslim" and "Citizen and Subject," and Mira Nair, the acclaimed Indian filmmaker ("Monsoon Wedding," "Salaam Bombay!"). This upbringing immersed him in critical discussions about colonialism, imperialism, race, class, and power from a global perspective. Dinner table conversations likely dissected the very structures Mamdani now seeks to dismantle politically. This wasn't just academic; it was personal history. His father's family faced expulsion from Uganda under Idi Amin, a stark lesson in state violence and displacement.
2. Elite Education and Its Discontents: Mamdani attended the prestigious Horace Mann School in the Bronx before heading to Columbia University and then Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. This trajectory placed him firmly within elite institutions. However, rather than simply assimilating, these experiences seem to have sharpened his critique. Studying political science and economics at such rarified levels likely provided him with the theoretical tools to dissect systemic inequalities with academic rigor, while simultaneously exposing him to the mechanisms that perpetuate them. The disconnect between the polished halls of academia and the struggles of ordinary people became increasingly apparent to him.
3. The Crucible of Queens: Crucially, Mamdani didn't retreat into the ivory tower. He moved to Astoria, Queens, and became a housing counselor at the non-profit Chhaya CDC, focusing on South Asian and Indo-Caribbean communities. This was transformative. Here, theory met concrete reality. He witnessed firsthand the devastating impacts of New York City's housing crisis – predatory landlords, rampant displacement, the human cost of eviction, and the systemic failures that allowed it to flourish. He wasn't just reading about exploitation; he was helping its victims navigate a rigged system daily. This direct engagement with the brutal realities of late-stage capitalism on immigrant and working-class New Yorkers fundamentally radicalized his perspective.
The Genesis of Socialist (Not Strictly "Communist") Views:
Labeling Mamdani a "Communist" in the classical, 20th-century sense (implying strict adherence to a vanguard party, centrally planned economy, and perhaps uncritical alignment with historical socialist states) is imprecise. He identifies as a socialist, specifically within the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) framework, which emphasizes democratic control of the economy, radical redistribution, and building power through electoral politics and mass movements. His views stem from several interconnected sources:
1. Systemic Analysis Inherited and Honed: From his father's work on the violent legacies of colonialism and the construction of racial and ethnic identities to his own studies, Mamdani views capitalism not as a neutral economic system, but as intrinsically linked to imperialism, racism, and exploitation. He sees poverty, inequality, the housing crisis, and climate change not as isolated failures but as necessary outcomes of a system prioritizing profit over people. Marxist analysis provides the primary lens through which he diagnoses these interconnected ills. The "Communist" label often applied stems from this foundational anti-capitalism and class analysis.
2. Lived Experience of Injustice in Queens: His years at Chhaya were not just a job; they were an immersion in the consequences of the system he critiques. He saw how:
Capital commodifies basic needs: Housing became a speculative asset, not a human right, leading to displacement and homelessness.
Racial capitalism operates: Immigrant communities, particularly working-class South Asian and Indo-Caribbean families, were disproportionately targeted and exploited by predatory landlords and financial institutions.
The state often sides with capital Tenant protections were weak, enforcement lax, and the political establishment frequently aligned with real estate interests.
This daily confrontation with exploitation cemented his belief that tinkering around the edges (liberal reformism) was insufficient. Fundamental systemic change was necessary.
3. The Failures of Liberalism and the Rise of the New Left: Coming of age politically during the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the Occupy movement, the rise of Bernie Sanders, and the visible fractures within the Democratic Party, Mamdani saw the limitations of mainstream liberalism. He witnessed it bailing out banks while leaving homeowners to drown, pursuing endless wars, and failing to address deepening inequality or the existential threat of climate change. The DSA's resurgence offered a vehicle for a more radical, uncompromising vision grounded in working-class power and anti-imperialism that resonated with his analysis and experiences.
Mamdani in Office: Socialist Praxis, Not Dogma
Since his upset victory in 2020 (defeating a long-term incumbent), Mamdani has demonstrated what his socialist politics look like in practice, focusing relentlessly on material needs and challenging power:
1. Housing as a Frontline Issue: Drawing directly on his Chhaya experience, he's been a fierce advocate for tenants. He championed the Housing Access Voucher Program (HAVP), fought for stronger eviction protections, and relentlessly targets the power of the real estate lobby. He views housing justice as central to the class struggle in NYC.
2. Building Working-Class Power: He co-sponsored the monumental Excluded Workers Fund, securing billions for undocumented and other workers left out of federal pandemic relief – a direct transfer of wealth to the most marginalized, embodying socialist redistribution. He actively supports labor organizing efforts, like the Amazon Labor Union.
3. Challenging the Carceral State & Imperialism: True to his anti-imperialist roots (influenced by his father's work and his own analysis), Mamdani has been a vocal critic of bloated police budgets, advocating for redirecting funds to community needs. He also took a strong stance against U.S. imperialism, notably criticizing the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan in terms that put him at odds even with some progressive allies like AOC, highlighting his principled anti-interventionism.
4. A Different Kind of Politician: Mamdani operates with a distinct style. He uses social media aggressively to mobilize constituents and shame opponents. His office prioritizes aggressive constituent services, viewing casework not just as helping individuals but as gathering data on systemic failures to fuel broader campaigns. He rejects corporate donations, funded primarily by small donations and unions.
Why the "Communist" Label? Context and Conflation
The persistent use of "Communist" to describe Mamdani (often by opponents or sensationalist media) stems from several factors:
1. American Political Lexicon: In the U.S., "socialist" and "communist" are often used interchangeably as boogeyman terms, especially by the right, with little regard for their distinct historical and theoretical meanings. His open embrace of "socialist" makes him an easy target for this conflation.
2. Radical Rhetoric and Analysis: Mamdani doesn't shy away from Marxist terminology (class struggle, exploitation, imperialism) or radical critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy. This sounds alien and extreme within the narrow confines of mainstream U.S. politics, easily tagged as "communist."
3. Anti-Imperialism: His strong critiques of U.S. foreign policy, echoing anti-imperialist traditions often associated (fairly or unfairly) with historical communist movements, further fuel the label.
4. The Shock of the New: A polished, young, effective legislator who is also an open socialist disrupts expectations. The label "communist" is a way for some to dismiss and delegitimize this new political force.
Conclusion: The Organic Intellectual in the State Assembly
Zohran Mamdani is not a doctrinaire Communist carrying a party card from a bygone era. He is, rather, a product of unique circumstances: a profound intellectual inheritance fused with direct, gritty experience of injustice in one of the world's most unequal cities. He is an "organic intellectual" in the Gramscian sense – emerging from and rooted in the struggles of his Queens constituency, wielding elite education not for personal advancement but to articulate and fight for their collective liberation.
His socialist views are not abstract ideology but a concrete response to the systemic failures he has analyzed and witnessed. They are a call for democratic control over the economy, prioritizing human needs over corporate profits, and dismantling the intertwined systems of capitalism, racism, and imperialism. The "communist" label is largely a simplistic and often weaponized misnomer. Mamdani represents something newer and more specific: the rising generation of democratic socialists translating deep systemic critique into practical, hard-nosed legislative politics, aiming to build power for the working class from the ground up, one eviction defense and one budget fight at a time. He embodies the attempt to bridge the gap between radical theory and the material realities of life in New York, making him one of the most distinctive and consequential figures in the state's evolving political landscape.
#Mamdani #NewYork #BlobalizedAntifada #Antifada