NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK

Real Time US National Debt Clock | USA Debt Clock.com

United States National Debt
United States National Debt Per Person
United States National Debt Per Household
Total US Unfunded Liabilities
Social Security Unfunded Liability
Medicare Unfunded Liability
Prescription Drug Unfunded Liability
National Healthcare Unfunded Liability
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Person
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Household
United States Population

Share this site:

(last updated 2024-08-09/Close of previous day debt was $35123327978028.47 )

2/11/25

They Fought Back!

#MLK #JFK #RFK #Reagan #Trump #MartinLutherKingJr #JohnFKennedy #RonaldReagan #RobertFKennedy

These 5 Men All Had The Same Domestic and Foreign Policies. The Believed In 'Peace Through Strength and NO NEW WARS For The Sake of War and To Profit From War. And They All Got Shot For Standing Up To The LAVIATHON...The BEAST....

OPINION;

General Wesley Clark "We're Goung To Take Out 7 Countries In 5 Years"...

80% of Harris/Biden/Obama Administration are OBAMA holdovers. This is the third term. However, they're doing the Bush playbook ... probably why the Cheneys are backing Harris.

Looking back, when Clinton was in office, the BUSH crew were sitting around and planning the takeover of 7 countries. Retired General Wesley Clark made a speech about that. Afghanistan was justified, but the other 6 were a mystery. Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lybia, Pakistan, Somalia. Why Iran was left out, after being a pain in the ass of the US since the Carter Administration, is another mystery. "Anyway", Bush 43 took care of the first two. Obama followed up with the play-a-long to get-a-long (Not Get Shot At). He entered office fighting in what Bush started and followed carrying out the other 5 General Clark talked about.

Fast forward to now, the Democrats had to impeach a guy who wanted to prevent the BS happening now. As of now, Biden has made money in Ukraine, the Sister of the Illinois Governor is now put in charge of rebuilding Ukraine, the CLINTON foundation is gonna make some money in Ukraine, and the Military Industrial Complex is making a 'Killing' in Ukraine. BTW, Obama is worth close to a Billion now. You can't have that much money just selling books, Netflix accounts, and speaking.

Ukraine is the most corrupt spot on the planet, but for some reason a lot of Democrats seem to get their cut.

BTW, that Rolls Royce dealership in Ukraine is still open!

General Wesley Clark "We're Goung To Take Out 7 Countries In 5 Years"

https://snip.ly/qkeffz

#WesleyClark #Obama #Iran #Bush #GeorgeBush #Iraq #MiddleEast

Another thing ... Trump is a Billionaire. He did that before his 4 years in office. Obama is about to become a Billionaire and he DIDN'T BUILD A THING ... He was a COMMUNITY [COMMUNISM] ORGANIZER. Obama started wars in secret places, made the Military Industrial Complex rich in 7 countries, killed over 1,100 innocent Sunni Muslims in favor of the Shiite Iranians ... and gave you a FREE PHONE. STAY SUCKA FREE!!!

#money #Trump #Obama #politics

OPINION/COMMENTARY

'No New Wars' Is Back!

I hate to beat a dead horse, but damn ... and I voted for him TWICE. Looking back and examining history make you hate your decisions sometimes...RIGHT???

Barrack Obama is almost worth a BILLION. They say it is from Netflix and Book Deals. Look, there aren't enough LIBERALS alive to read that much nor have the attention span to watch that many Netflix Documentaries. He left the Whitehouse 30 times richer than he entered. So, let's water this mess down. They say he was working those deals out while in in office. WOW, Trump had to sign away everything to his kids.

Obama entered office while the country was fighting in 2 (TWO) Countries: Iraq and Afghanistan. When he left we were fighting in 7 Countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lybia, Somalia, Yemen, and Pakistan. 85% of those killed were innocent civilians ... such as Women, Children, Goat Herders, etc. Most were drone strikes signed off by OBAMA. 'INTERCEPT MAGAZINE THE DRONE WARS' will explain it. The Military Industrial Complex is a 1 Trillion Dollar a year industry. If you authorize/let/allow it to happen you apparently get paid.

Trump advocated and still advocates to STOP ENDLESS WARS!!!

#Trump #War #Obama #Politics

OPINION/COMMENTARY

Trump Is An Original JFK Democrat Who Was Left By The Democratic Party

The reason why Trump wants Democrats named KENNEDY and GABBARD is because he is a former JFK Democrat. Trump was great Friends with JFK Jr. When he visited his house JFK Jr was always playing the 'Stones'. That is how we got the song at his rallies - 'You Can't Always Get What You Want'.

Ronald Reagan was a JFK Democrat. All 3 had/have the same foreign policy and the same domestic policy(ies). JFK would have left the Democratic Party by now. Reagan did, and Trump did. The Democratic Party went LOCO.

SADLY, all three of the forementioned Presidents were shot. Only one died from the wounds. All three were able to Communicate and negotiate with their Russsian counterparts and avoid NEW WARS while their Political Opposition called them Russian Sympathizers. That brings in Tulsi Gabbard. She has served the Military for 20 years. She joined after 9/11. HILLARY DIDN'T!!! And Hillary calls her a Russian Sympathizer just because she doesn't see a need in fighting Russia. It was the Democrats the set Putin off. NATO was not to go 1 foot to the East.

DON'T get GASLIT again because you HATE TRUMP.

#jfk #jfkjr #tulsigabbard #rfk #rfkjr

Democrats Never Own Their S***

If you oppose DOGE, you probably believed Russia Russia Russia, Jessie Smollett, Joe Biden was on top of his game, the Hunter Biden Laptop was a hoax - even though he was convicted based on evidence from the Laptop, the VIRUS came from BAT SOUP, the mask will save you, and our Kids are dumb because other countries grade their kids wrong...Oh, and DRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR has nothing to do with CHILD MUTILATION.

DEMOCRATS don't ever own their s***. They just call people names who call out their s***. Their shit is s***. They walk through shit, walk into a room and say "Your shoes stink".

Democrats Lost Because of Their Bad Policies, Not Their Bad Attitude

#Democrats #DOGE #USAID

Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, speaks with former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) at a town hall at the Royal Oak Music Theatre on October 21, 2024, in Royal Oak, Michigan.(Sarah Rice / Getty Images)

This Time We Have to Hold the Democratic Party Elite Responsible for This Catastrophe

Trump won because the opposition party is committed to ancien régime restoration in a country that desperately wants change.

Why Egypt and other Arab countries are unwilling to take in Palestinian refugees from Gaza

As Jordan’s King Abdullah meets Trump, can he resist US pressure on Gaza?

Trump’s comments on displacing Palestinians from Gaza faces strong opposition from Jordan and Arab countries.

Jordan's King Abdullah has insisted that his country will resist any plans to displace Palestinians from Gaza [File: Yiannis Kourtoglou/Pool/Reuters]

Why Egypt and other Arab countries are unwilling to take in Palestinian refugees from Gaza

Why Egypt won't allow vulnerable Palestinians across its border

#Egypt #Jordan #Palestinians #Israel #MiddleEast

LOVE HURTS! THE EAGLES WON!

#Swift #Hurts #Kelce #Chiefs #Eagles #SuperBowl #NFL

Taylor Swift sent message from fellow WAG worth $10m after Donald Trump Super Bowl drama

Taylor Swift was booed by fans at the Super Bowl as she watched her boyfriend Travis Kelce in action for the Kansas City Chiefs, and Livvy Dunne has a message for the singer

The View star doubts Super Bowl crowd’s 'broader' intent booing Taylor Swift, says Trump is 'most popular he’s ever been'

"She got booed because half of the crowd are Eagles fans, and [she's] dating one of the star players," Alyssa Farah Griffin said.

Who Is Jalen Hurts' Fiancée? What to Know About the NFL Star's Future Wife Ahead of Super Bowl LIX

6 hidden messages in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl performance

#SuperBowl #NFL #HalftimeShow #KendrickLamar

DOGE and Jussie Smollett

#DOGE #JussieSmollet

Buy GOLD

CLICK HERE FOR A FREE GOLD KIT

#crypto #bitcoin #money #investing #gold

2/10/25

Trump Takes A Stand Against Anti-White Persecution South Africa had supposedly ended racism when they overthrew the apartheid regime

Trump Takes A Stand Against Anti-White Persecution

South Africa had supposedly ended racism when they overthrew the apartheid regime

#SouthAfrica #Africa #DOGE #WhitePersecution

Costco shoppers seen stockpiling hundreds of eggs into carts amid nationwide shortage

#Costco #Eggs #Economy #Inflation

What Was President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the Military Industrial Complex?

What Was President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the Military Industrial Complex?

In his farewell address on January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned the American people about the growing influence of what he called the "military-industrial complex." This term referred to the close relationship between the military, the defense industry, and policymakers. Eisenhower, a former five-star general, cautioned that this relationship could lead to an overemphasis on military spending and the potential for the defense industry to wield too much influence over national policy.

Eisenhower expressed concern that, without careful oversight, the military-industrial complex could undermine democracy by prioritizing defense contracts and military expansion over other national needs, such as education or social welfare. His warning was significant because it came from a leader who understood both the necessity of a strong national defense and the risks of excessive militarization.

Eisenhower's key message was a call for balance and vigilance, urging future leaders and citizens to guard against the undue influence of the defense industry on government and to ensure that national priorities remained focused on peace and the broader well-being of the country.

John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump Are The Only Presidents Since 1960 That Didn't Get The US Into Any New Wars Or Long Term Conflicts.

It’s true that John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump are often noted for not starting major new wars or long-term conflicts during their presidencies, but it's important to clarify the nature of U.S. military involvement under each.

John F. Kennedy (1961–1963)

Kennedy's presidency saw the escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, though he did not formally commit large numbers of ground troops. His administration supported the South Vietnamese government through military aid and advisors, laying the groundwork for the later, more direct U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War under Lyndon B. Johnson. Kennedy also navigated the Cuban Missile Crisis without a direct military conflict.

Ronald Reagan (1981–1989)

While Reagan did not engage the U.S. in major new wars, he was involved in several military interventions. These included the invasion of Grenada in 1983 and the bombing of Libya in 1986. Reagan's presidency was also marked by indirect military involvement, including support for anti-communist forces in Latin America, Africa, and Afghanistan, such as the Contras in Nicaragua and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. These were part of Reagan's broader strategy to combat Soviet influence during the Cold War, but they didn’t lead to prolonged U.S. military engagements.

Donald Trump (2017–2021)

Trump, like Reagan, did not initiate any large-scale wars. He focused more on withdrawing U.S. troops from long-term conflicts, such as Syria and Afghanistan. He also sought to reduce U.S. military presence abroad and emphasized diplomatic engagement (e.g., with North Korea). While he ordered targeted strikes, like the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, these actions did not lead to new wars or long-term conflicts. Trump was notable for his emphasis on avoiding military entanglements and "endless wars."

In summary, while none of these presidents initiated major new wars, they each handled military involvement in different ways, with Kennedy escalating in Vietnam, Reagan engaging in smaller military actions and proxy wars, and Trump emphasizing troop withdrawals and targeted strikes.

#JFK #RonaldReagan #Trump #Eisenhower #Reagan #DonaldTrump #JohnFKennedy

Trump Weighs Pardon, Possible Ambassadorship For Governor Convicted In Corruption Scandal

Rod Blagojevich was convicted in 2011 on 18 counts of corruption and was sentenced to 14 years behind bars.

#Trump #Pardon #Ambassadorship #Governor #Convicted #Illinois #CorruptionScandal #RodBlagojevich

Hollywood Stars and USAID: Reports of Financial Support for Pro-Ukraine Advocacy

Hollywood Stars and USAID: Reports of Financial Support for Pro-Ukraine Advocacy

Recent reports suggest that several Hollywood celebrities who have publicly voiced support for Ukraine amid its conflict with Russia have received significant financial compensation from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

According to the Telegram channel “MIG of Russia,” actors such as Sean Penn, Orlando Bloom, Jean-Claude Van Damme, and Ben Stiller allegedly received payments for their advocacy efforts and visits to Kyiv. The reported figures include $1.5 million for Van Damme, $4 million for Stiller, $5 million for Penn, and $8 million for Bloom. The highest amount is said to have been allocated to Angelina Jolie, allegedly receiving $20 million.

EADaily also reports that the recent decision by U.S. President Donald Trump to freeze USAID funding has caused significant concern among Ukrainian media outlets that have relied on external financial support. Some outlets have reportedly turned to public donations to sustain their operations.

While these claims have gained attention, there has been no official confirmation from USAID or the involved celebrities regarding the alleged payments. The role of international funding in media and advocacy remains a complex and debated issue, particularly in the context of geopolitical conflicts.

#Hollywood #USAID #AngelinaJolie #BenStiller

The Department of Education Told Employees to End Support for Transgender Students

#Trans #Transgender #DOE #DepartmentofEducation #Education

U.S. Naval Academy Reviews School Clubs for Compliance with Executive Orders on DEI

February 10, 2025

The U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, is currently reviewing its school-sponsored clubs and activities to ensure compliance with President Donald Trump’s executive orders prohibiting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs within federal institutions, according to reports.

Since returning to office, President Trump has issued several executive orders aimed at restoring merit-based policies within the military and federal agencies. These directives mandate the elimination of DEI-related positions and initiatives that consider characteristics such as race or gender over merit-based qualifications.

Review of School Clubs Underway

A spokesperson for the Naval Academy confirmed that the institution is actively assessing its clubs and extracurricular activities to align with federal directives. "We are reviewing all clubs and extracurricular activities to ensure alignment with applicable Executive Orders and will provide updated implementation guidance as needed," the representative stated.

Currently, the Naval Academy offers several identity-based clubs, including the Midshipmen Black Studies Club, Society of Women Engineers, and the Italian-American Midshipmen Club. As of now, no clubs have been disbanded.

The review follows a similar move by the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, which recently disbanded approximately a dozen identity-based clubs as part of compliance with the president’s DEI policies. Organizations affected at West Point included the Society of Black Engineers, the Asian-Pacific Forum Club, and the pro-LGBT group Spectrum.

Administrative Actions and Legal Challenges

A memorandum from Naval Academy Superintendent Yvette Davids, reported by Fox News, indicated that the institution is taking steps to dismantle any DEI-related offices or contracts. However, the Naval Academy clarified that it has not had a DEI office since at least mid-2024, meaning no specific office closures have resulted from the recent executive order.

Additionally, the Naval Academy has faced legal scrutiny over its admissions policies. In October 2023, the organization Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a lawsuit alleging that the academy engaged in racial balancing, which they argue violates the Fifth Amendment. The lawsuit claimed that the school favored Black, Hispanic, and Native American applicants over white and Asian candidates.

While the Supreme Court previously ruled against race-based admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the decision did not extend to military academies. A federal judge dismissed SFFA’s lawsuit against the Naval Academy in December 2024, prompting an appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Broader Military Policy Shifts

These developments coincide with President Trump’s broader efforts to reshape military leadership and policy. On Monday, Trump announced via Truth Social that he had ordered the dismissal of the Board of Visitors for the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard. He cited concerns that military academies had been influenced by “woke leftist ideologues” in recent years and pledged to appoint new board members committed to strengthening the armed forces.

“We must make the Military Academies GREAT AGAIN!” Trump stated.

The ongoing changes reflect a larger policy shift within the administration to prioritize merit-based advancement and reduce identity-based considerations in military education and operations.

#USNavalAcademy #SchoolClubs #Navy #Compliance #ExecutiveOrders #DEI

J.D. Vance Suggests Trump Can Defy Judges, Sparking Constitutional Concerns

J.D. Vance Suggests Trump Can Defy Judges, Sparking Constitutional Concerns

J.D. Vance, the Vice President of the United States, has made a bold claim that could have significant constitutional implications. In a post on X, he argued that judges do not have the authority to control executive power, suggesting that the Trump administration may not comply with certain judicial rulings.

"If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal," Vance wrote. "Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power."

His statement, which implies that the Trump administration could ignore court orders, quickly sparked backlash. Legal experts and political leaders warn that such a stance could undermine the balance of power outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Judicial Authority and the Separation of Powers

The U.S. government operates under a system of checks and balances, ensuring that no single branch has unchecked power. The judiciary plays a critical role in interpreting the law and ensuring that executive actions adhere to the Constitution. However, Vance’s comments, alongside statements from legal scholar Adrian Vermeule, suggest a push to redefine these limits. Vermeule argued that judicial intervention in executive matters constitutes a "violation of the separation of powers."

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, who leads Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), also hinted at supporting defiance of judicial rulings. He reshared a post questioning what options remain if courts block executive actions, signaling potential resistance to judicial oversight.

Legal and Political Pushback

Prominent political figures swiftly criticized Vance’s remarks. Democratic Rep. Daniel Goldman responded, "It’s called the ‘rule of law’ @jdvance. Our Constitution created three co-equal branches of government to provide checks and balances. The judiciary ensures the executive follows the law."

Former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that legal challenges must be addressed through appeals rather than outright defiance. "You don’t get to rage-quit the Republic just because you are losing," she stated. "That’s tyranny."

Judges Already Blocking Trump’s Orders

Federal courts have already stepped in to halt several of the Trump administration’s executive actions. More than 30 lawsuits have been filed nationwide to challenge various policies.

Restraining Access to Government Data: A federal judge recently blocked Musk and the DOGE team from accessing sensitive Treasury Department data. The ruling required any improperly accessed information to be destroyed immediately, citing "irreparable harm" if the data were misused.
USAID Employee Suspensions: Another federal judge stopped the administration from placing more than 2,000 USAID employees on administrative leave, reinstating 500 who had already been suspended.
Birthright Citizenship: A federal court declared Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship "blatantly unconstitutional." Judge John Coughenour, a Reagan appointee, said the legal issue was "as clear as any" he had seen in four decades on the bench.

Additionally, courts have issued injunctions against efforts to freeze federal assistance payments, with lawsuits brought by states and nonprofit organizations challenging these actions.

The Road Ahead

As the Trump administration pushes forward with its agenda, the judiciary will remain a key player in determining the legality of its actions. However, if Vance’s comments reflect the White House’s broader strategy, the nation could face a historic constitutional standoff.

The fundamental question now is whether the executive branch will respect judicial authority—or if it will set a precedent that challenges the rule of law itself.

#Trump #JDVance #Whitehouse #BirthrightCitizenship #Politics