Democrats Are LYING To You

 Democrats Are LYING To You

Democrats are LYING to you. Go check your GROCERY and GAS prices. Biden brought 1 trillion dollars in foreign countries investing in America in 4 years. Trump got that yesterday in one day from Saudi Arabia. In total he has gotten 22 Trillion in less than a year.

Democrats even are mad about the Drug Boats being blown up. They hate everything Pro -American.

The Empty Cart and the Full Tank: How Conservative Policies Deliver Prosperity While Democrats Deny Reality

There is no more potent, daily reminder of the health of a nation’s economy than the price of bread and the cost of a gallon of gas. These are not abstract metrics discussed on financial news networks; they are the visceral, tangible realities that define a family’s budget and shape their sense of security. And right now, for millions of Americans, that reality is one of painful squeeze. The post is unequivocal: “Go check your GROCERY and GAS prices.” This simple command cuts through the political spin and the bureaucratic jargon to point to an undeniable truth. The Biden administration’s economic policies have failed the American people, leading to historic inflation that has eroded paychecks and fueled economic anxiety. Meanwhile, the same political party that presided over this decline now actively opposes the very policies that would restore American prosperity and sovereignty.

The evidence of this failure is in every shopping cart and at every pump. Under the current administration, we have witnessed the highest inflation rates in a generation. The cost of groceries has skyrocketed, with staples like meat, eggs, and milk seeing double-digit percentage increases. The price of gasoline, a linchpin of the entire economy, reached record highs, creating a ripple effect that makes every consumer good more expensive to transport and produce. This isn’t a mysterious, global phenomenon that America is helpless to combat; it is the direct result of a specific set of policy choices. The Biden administration’s war on domestic energy—from canceling the Keystone XL pipeline to halting new oil and gas leases on federal lands—signaled a hostility toward American energy independence that emboldened foreign producers and crushed domestic supply. This, combined with trillions of dollars in unchecked government spending, flooded the economy with cheap money, devaluing the dollar and forcing prices to rise. The Democrats’ answer is to deflect, to blame “corporate greed” or global supply chains, but the American people are not fooled. They feel the consequences of this agenda every time they swipe their card at the register.

This dismal record stands in stark contrast to the prosperity and global confidence fostered by the previous administration. The post highlights a stunning economic comparison: “Biden brought 1 trillion dollars in foreign countries investing in America in 4 years. Trump got that yesterday in one day from Saudi Arabia. In total he has gotten 22 Trillion in less than a year.” While the specific figures can be debated, the underlying principle is unassailable. The Trump administration’s focus on deregulation, tax cuts, and unleashing American energy production created a magnet for international capital. By establishing the United States as the world’s most attractive place to do business, it spurred a wave of investment that created jobs, raised wages, and strengthened the nation’s economic footing. The recent commitment from Saudi Arabia and other nations is a testament to the enduring power of that pro-growth model. The world invests in strength, not in appeasement; in economic vitality, not in managed decline. The contrast is not merely one of degree, but of philosophy: one party believes in making America the best place in the world to invest and create wealth, while the other believes in punishing success and redistributing the remnants.

This philosophical divide extends beyond economics to the very core of national security and civic health. The post’s observation that “Democrats even are mad about the Drug Boats being blown up” is a powerful symbol of this schism. A strong, sovereign nation defends its borders and takes decisive action against those who would flood its communities with deadly narcotics. The image of destroying the vessels of drug traffickers is one of unambiguous strength and resolve. It sends a clear message to cartels and criminals that their operations will not be tolerated. Yet, the modern Democratic Party, in thrall to a progressive base that often views law enforcement as the enemy and national borders as a sin, responds with hand-wringing and criticism. They prioritize the perceived rights of criminals over the safety of American citizens, opposing tough-on-crime policies and advocating for a weakened, open border that serves as a superhighway for drugs, human trafficking, and crime.

This pattern reveals a disturbing truth, bluntly stated in the post: “They hate everything Pro-American.” This is not a partisan cheap shot; it is an assessment of a consistent pattern of behavior. From kneeling for the national anthem to tearing down historical statues, from advocating for the defunding of police departments to apologizing for American strength on the world stage, the radical left—which now holds immense sway over the Democratic Party—seems to hold a fundamental contempt for the traditional pillars of American life. They view patriotism as jingoism, national pride as racism, and economic success as oppression. Their vision for America is not one of renewal and confidence, but of deconstruction and atonement.

The conservative vision, conversely, is unapologetically pro-American. It believes in the power of the free market to deliver prosperity far more effectively than any government plan. It understands that a nation must first be secure to be prosperous, which requires a strong military, secure borders, and a robust law enforcement presence. It celebrates American history and ideals, recognizing that while our journey toward a more perfect union has been flawed, the principles enshrined in our founding documents are a beacon of liberty for the entire world. It is a vision of peace through strength, prosperity through freedom, and unity through shared purpose.

The choice before the American people has never been clearer. On one side is a party that offers empty grocery carts, expensive gas, open borders, and an apology tour for American exceptionalism. On the other is a party that offers a thriving economy, energy independence, secure communities, and a renewed sense of national pride. The evidence is not in a politician’s speech or a pundit’s analysis; it is in the ledger of your household budget and the view from your car window. The path forward is not one of managed decline and self-flagellation, but of unleashed potential and unwavering resolve. It is time to reject the lies, embrace the truth, and once again pursue policies that are unambiguously, and successfully, Pro-American.

#Democrats #Republicans #Policies #Politics

STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT - BLACKS FEEL BETRAYED

 

STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT - BLACKS FEEL BETRAYED

Chicago/Illinois is ran by Democrats. Democrats 'CLAIM' to be for the 'BLACKS'. They constantly are raising Property Taxes in Illinois. 80% of the Property Taxes goes to the Public Schools, where only 18% of the kids can do math and read. BLACK COMMUNITIES ARE FEELING THE TAX INCREASES THE HARDEST. This makes the Property values go DOWN! This is because the Politicians know/think that the BLACKS in CHICAGO can't or won't CONNECT THE DOTS and act functionally in the head don't realize the PEOPLE/DEMOCRATS they vote for are USING them and DO NOT CARE ABOUT THEM. BTW, Illinois Teachers and State Politicians are some of the highest paid in the country. It's the same in every large Blue Cities and States...High Property Taxes, Highly Paid Teachers and Politicians, and low results in the classrooms and no relief and more burden on Tax Payers.

They have BLACK PEOPLE burning their Tax Bills In Chicago. It's time for a Republican movement in Chicago.

The only people benefitting are those that are Welfare Kings and Queens, Government Employees, and Democratic Elites getting Subsidies for Fake Industries.

Save the Country and stop voting for Democrats. Obama bragged about the amount of people added to the Welfare roles, not job creation or business investments. Biden acquired 1Trillion from foreign investment to America in 4 years. Trump has acquired 22 Trillion in foreign Investment to America in less than a year.

BLACK PEOPLE, STOP VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS! STOP SAYING "BOTH PARTIES ARE BAD" When you see and know only ONE PARTY is FUCKING YOU IN THE ASS and LYING TO YOU. The walk you through SHIT and then tell you it's YOUR fault YOUR shoes stink. Stop Voting Democrat. They're even mad because Trump is blowing up DRUG BOATS! Everything GOOD for the COUNTRY Democrats  Hate ... [Communist Bastards - Is What We Called Those Types In Basic Training]

The Great Betrayal: Why Decades of Democratic Rule Have Failed Black America

The scene in Chicago is one of profound disillusionment: residents, pushed to the brink by soaring property taxes, are setting their tax bills on fire. This act of desperation is a powerful symbol of a broken social contract, and it is unfolding in one of the most staunchly Democratic cities in the nation. For decades, cities like Chicago and states like Illinois have been wholly governed by a single party—the Democratic Party. This party claims to be the champion of Black Americans, but the reality on the ground tells a starkly different story. It is a story of economic oppression, educational failure, and a cynical political strategy that takes a loyal voting bloc for granted while offering nothing in return but empty promises and escalating bills.

The economic mechanism of this failure is brutally clear. As the post accurately notes, property taxes in Illinois are constantly rising, with a staggering 80% of that revenue funneled into the public school system. The return on this massive investment is nothing short of catastrophic. With only 18% of students proficient in math and reading, the system is not just failing; it is actively robbing an entire generation of their future. High taxes fund a system that produces functional illiteracy, crippling the very children it claims to serve. This creates a vicious cycle: failing schools depress property values, which then requires even higher tax rates to fund the same failing system, further driving down property values. Who feels this pain most acutely? The Black communities of Chicago, who see their wealth—often tied to their homes—evaporate while their children are denied a quality education.

The beneficiaries of this broken system are not the students or the taxpayers. They are the powerful public sector unions and the political class they bankroll. Illinois teachers and state politicians are among the highest paid in the country. The system is designed to serve them, not the children. It is a classic case of concentrated benefits and diffuse costs: the teachers' unions reap the rewards of high salaries and robust pensions, while the cost is spread across millions of taxpayers in the form of higher taxes and across generations of children in the form of stolen opportunity. The post’s characterization of “Welfare Kings and Queens” may be provocative, but it points to a painful truth: the Democratic policy model has created a cycle of dependency that benefits the party at the polls but impoverishes communities in reality. As the post recalls, President Obama boasted about adding people to welfare rolls, not about creating pathways to economic independence. This is the core of the Democratic philosophy: manage poverty, don’t create prosperity.

The contrast in economic leadership could not be more pronounced. The post highlights a stunning statistic: while the Biden administration secured $1 trillion in foreign investment over four years, the Trump administration attracted $22 trillion in less than a year. This isn’t just a difference in degree; it’s a difference in philosophy. One philosophy, embraced by Republicans, unleashes free-market capitalism, cuts regulations, and incentivizes investment, creating jobs and opportunity for everyone, including Black Americans who saw record-low unemployment and rising wages. The other philosophy, championed by Democrats, relies on government control, redistribution, and subsidies for politically favored “fake industries,” which stifles growth and innovation.

The most heartbreaking aspect of this decades-long betrayal is the political captivity of the Black community. The post’s raw plea—“BLACK PEOPLE, STOP VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS!”—comes from a place of witnessing this cycle of abuse. For over half a century, Democratic politicians have walked these communities through the “shit” of failing schools, rampant crime, and economic despair, only to turn around and blame everyone else—systemic racism, insufficient funding, Republican obstruction—for the stench on their shoes. They have convinced a people they champion to never hold them accountable for their failures. The argument that “both parties are bad” is a luxury belief that those suffering under the direct consequences of one party’s misrule cannot afford. When one party has controlled your city for 70 years, the crime, the corruption, the failing schools, and the crushing taxes are not a Republican problem. They are a Democratic creation.

It is time for a new movement, one built on the conservative principles of empowerment, school choice, economic opportunity, and individual responsibility. School choice, in particular, is the civil rights issue of our time. It would break the monopoly of the failing public school system and give Black parents the power to choose a quality education for their children, just as wealthy families do. Economic policies that promote job creation and small business ownership, not welfare expansion, are the true path to wealth building. And a party that celebrates blowing up “drug boats” and securing the border understands that safe communities are the foundation upon which all else is built.

The Democratic Party has had a monopoly on the trust of Black America for generations. That monopoly has produced nothing but decay. The burning tax bills in Chicago are a signal fire, a cry for help from a community being bled dry by the very people who claim to care for it. It is time to connect the dots. It is time to see the Democratic Party not as a savior, but as a captor. It is time to stop voting for promises and start voting for results. It is time to save our cities, and our country, by finally ending the great Democratic betrayal.

#Blacks #Voting #Politics

How Far Back Will This Epstein Situation Go

How Far Back Will This Epstein Situation Go:

Wow, Hakeem Jeffries Campaign was begging Epstein for money AFTER Epstein was convicted of raping and trafficking a 14 year old girl in Florida.

It has also been mentioned that Hakeem Jeffries liked attending the 'Freak Off' Parties at Diddy's spot.

Side Rant:

[Hakeem Jeffries (D), the House Minority Leader (Democrats) refers to a 'Republican Healthcare Crisis'. The Government was shut down because of OBAMACARE being so F$%@ed up to begin with. Not one single Republican in the House a d Senate voted for OBAMACARE fifteen years ago. If you think I am wrong go check. In the meantime if you believe Hakeem Jeffries you are drinking the Kool-aid and inhaling the GAS[LIGHT]. It is not up to Republicans to take the blame for what Democrats created. However, Republicans should take this opportunity to expose the bad POLICY for what it is. Premiums are up 400%. Life expectancy is 7 years LESS. We have 50% LESS Doctors, Nurses, CNA's, Hospitals, and Insurance Companies. Less choice means higher costs and poor service.]

Top House Democrat Jeffries solicited campaign funds from Epstein

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters as the House heads toward a vote on a bill to force the Justice Department to release the case files it has collected on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, Nov. 17, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Also, when Epstein was locked up in Florida he was allowed to leave and go to his office at 5am and back at 8pm. Word has it Comey's Daughter, who worked on the P. Diddy case and the Epstein case, and who was fired abruptly, was allegedly trying to get a deal with Epstein if he flipped on Trump. If so, everyone has gone soft on Epstein over the years.

THE EPSTEIN CASE IN FLORIDA:

"It is widely accepted that Jeffrey Epstein received an extraordinarily lenient, or "soft" deal, in Florida in 2008 for sex crimes involving underage girls. The non-prosecution agreement (NPA), negotiated by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, allowed Epstein to avoid serious federal charges and potential life imprisonment in exchange for pleading guilty to two state prostitution charges. 

Key aspects of the controversial deal included:

Lenient Sentence: Epstein served just 13 months of an 18-month county jail sentence.

Work Release: He was granted extensive work-release privileges, allowing him to leave the jail up to 16 hours a day, six days a week, to work from his Palm Beach office and home.

Immunity: The deal provided immunity from federal prosecution for Epstein and his "potential co-conspirators," which effectively shut down a broader federal investigation.

Secrecy: The agreement was negotiated secretly, and the victims were not informed about it, a violation a federal judge later ruled was a breach of the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

Federal Indictment Shelved: A 53-page federal indictment that could have put him behind bars for life was sealed and shelved. 

The deal has been widely criticized as a "sweetheart deal" that gave Epstein special treatment due to his wealth and connections. A subsequent Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) review in 2020 found that while the prosecutors did not commit professional misconduct or break the law, they had used "poor judgment" in handling the case. 

The fallout from the deal was significant, leading to the resignation of Alex Acosta as U.S. Secretary of Labor in 2019. The legal challenges surrounding the 2008 deal continue to this day, with Ghislaine Maxwell currently appealing her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing the original agreement granted her immunity as a co-conspirator."

DID DONALD BARR GIVE EPSTEIN HIS BIG BREAK?

How Did Jeffrey Epstein Get That Job At Dalton School?

Donald Barr

Donald Barr was the Father of William (Bill) Barr. Bill Barr was United States Attorney General in the administration of President George H. W. Bush from 1991 to 1993 and again in the first administration of President Donald Trump from 2019 to 2020. Bill Barr worked for George H. W. Bush in the CIA When Bush 41 headed the CIA in 1976 - 1977 under Carter. Bill Barr and Bush worked at the CIA concurrently, and this period served as a foundation for their later working relationship, which included Bill Barr serving as Attorney General under Bush 41 from 1991 to 1993. 

Donald Barr was an administrator at Columbia University before serving as headmaster at the Dalton School in New York City and the Hackley School in Tarrytown, New York. While at Dalton School This happened:

'Donald Barr, the father of former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, was the headmaster of the elite Dalton School in New York City when Jeffrey Epstein was hired to teach math and science in 1974 When Epstein was 20 years old. It remains a point of some contention whether Donald Barr was directly involved in the hiring, as he resigned from his headmaster position in February 1974, effective at the end of the school year, and Epstein began teaching in September of that year, under new leadership.' DONALD BARR WENT ON TO WRITE A FICTION BOOK ON 'THE FUTURE OF PEDOPHILIA'. Why write a BOOK on that?

Donald Barr's tenure as headmaster ended around the time Epstein began teaching. It is unclear if Barr made the final decision or if it was handled by the incoming administration based on Barr's recommendations.

Epstein was hired despite not having a college degree, which was an unconventional decision. Donald Barr was known for making such unconventional hires, seeing potential in young people regardless of formal credentials.

Epstein taught at the Dalton School for two years before being dismissed for "poor performance". He then used his connections made at the school, including tutoring the son of Bear Stearns chairman Alan "Ace" Greenberg, to secure a job at the investment bank, launching his Wall Street career.

Fast forward, Obama was a smooth talking mouthpiece for the Military Industrial Complex and Apparently he was running cover for a lot of elites. They knew what Epstein was about for a long time.

The Web of The Web of Power: What the Epstein Scandal Reveals About a Corrupt Elite: What the Epstein Scandal Reveals About a Corrupt Elite

The recent unsealing of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case has sent shockwaves through the public, but for many conservatives, it has simply confirmed long-held suspicions about a pervasive culture of corruption among a protected, liberal elite. The fact that a sitting House Minority Leader, Hakeem Jeffries, had his campaign soliciting funds from Epstein *after* the financier’s conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor is not an isolated incident. It is a symptom of a deeply rotten system where power protects its own, morality is optional for the connected, and the rules are different for those in the inner circle.

This scandal stretches across decades and transcends party lines in its early stages, but its contemporary cover-up and exploitation reek of a specific brand of progressive hypocrisy. The revelation about Jeffries is particularly galling. Here is a man who now stands as a pillar of the Democratic establishment, a leader who routinely accuses his political opponents of moral failings, yet his own campaign was financially intertwined with a convicted sex trafficker. This is the very definition of the elite’s two-tiered system of justice: one for them, and one for everyone else. It exposes their moral posturing for what it is—a cynical smokescreen to gain power, not a genuine code of conduct.

The post’s “side rant” on healthcare is more connected to this central theme than it may first appear. When Leader Jeffries falsely proclaims a “Republican Healthcare Crisis,” he is employing the same gaslighting tactic used to downplay the Epstein affair. He is blaming others for a disaster his own party created. Just as Obamacare was passed without a single Republican vote and has since led to skyrocketing premiums and fewer choices for patients, the protection of Epstein was a bipartisan failure of the powerful, now being managed by a party that refuses to police its own. The common thread is a blatant disregard for accountability and a willingness to lie directly to the American people to preserve a narrative and maintain control.

The questions surrounding the Epstein case’s handling are where the stench of a politicized justice system becomes overwhelming. The notion that Epstein was given a notoriously lenient plea deal in Florida, allowed to leave jail for hours each day, and that individuals like former FBI Director James Comey’s daughter were involved in the case, fuels legitimate suspicion. The idea that the focus was not on justice for victims, but on potentially manipulating the case to “flip” Epstein against a political target like Donald Trump, is a chilling prospect. It suggests that for the deep state, even the most heinous crimes are merely tools to be wielded in a political war.

The historical connections, such as Epstein’s hiring at the elite Dalton School by Donald Barr, the father of former Attorney General William Barr, are complex and date back decades. While these connections from the 1970s show that Epstein’s web was vast, the contemporary cover-up is the real issue. The conservative concern is not about relitigating fifty-year-old hiring decisions, but about the active protection of Epstein and his clientele by the modern liberal establishment. Figures like Bill Clinton, who took numerous flights on the “Lolita Express,” and the Democratic donors and influencers who populated Epstein’s social circle, seem to have benefited from a wall of silence.

This is the central point: a network of wealthy, connected elites—heavily concentrated in left-leaning circles of finance, academia, and politics—appears to have operated with impunity for years. They viewed themselves as untouchable, insulated by their money and influence. The smooth-talking politicians, like Barack Obama, who rose to prominence as the acceptable face of this system, provided a veneer of respectability for a culture that was anything but.

The conservative perspective on this scandal is rooted in a fundamental belief in the rule of law. We believe that no one, regardless of their wealth, status, or political connections, should be above it. The Epstein case is a stark reminder that this principle is under assault. It reveals an entrenched elite that believes it can engage in the most depraved behavior and face no consequences, all while lecturing ordinary Americans about morality and justice.

The question, “How far back will this go?” is the right one. The answer must be: as far as necessary to expose every individual who participated in, enabled, or covered up these atrocities. This is not a partisan witch hunt; it is a demand for long-overdue justice. It is about dismantling the two-tiered system that allows the powerful to prey on the vulnerable and then hide behind their positions of influence. For the sake of the victims and for the soul of the nation, this web of power must be torn down, and every last person complicit in this evil must be held to account.

#BillBarr #Obama #Bush41 #GeorgeHWBush #DonaldBarr

A RANT ON DEMOCRATS

 

A RANT ON DEMOCRATS:

The Great Gaslight: Exposing the Democratic Lie of a "Republican Healthcare Crisis"

Hakeem Jeffries (D), the House Minority Leader (Democrats) refers to a 'Republican Healthcare Crisis'. The Government was shut down because of OBAMACARE being so F$%@ed up to begin with. Not one single Republican in the House a d Senate voted for OBAMACARE fifteen years ago. If you think I am wrong go check. In the meantime if you believe Hakeem Jeffries you are drinking the Kool-aid and inhaling the GAS[LIGHT]. It is not up to Republicans to take the blame for what Democrats created. However, Republicans should take this opportunity to expose the bad POLICY for what it is. Premiums are up 400%. Life expectancy is 7 years LESS. We have 50% LESS Doctors, Nurses, CNA's, Hospitals, and Insurance Companies. Less choice means higher costs and poor service.

ANALYSIS

The Great Gaslight: Exposing the Democratic Lie of a "Republican Healthcare Crisis"

In the grand theater of American politics, few acts are as brazen as the attempt to blame others for the catastrophic consequences of one’s own policies. The latest performance features House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D), who has the audacity to point to the wreckage of the American healthcare system and label it a “Republican Healthcare Crisis.” This is not just a political misdirection; it is a profound and deliberate gaslighting of the American public. The truth, as the foundational post rightly asserts, is that the roots of our current healthcare turmoil can be traced directly to a single, partisan piece of legislation passed fifteen years ago: the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. And the record is unequivocal—not one single Republican in the House or Senate voted for it.

To understand the sheer chutzpah of Leader Jeffries’ claim, one must revisit the political environment of 2010. Democrats, holding full control of the government, engaged in a series of backroom deals and legislative contortions to force Obamacare into law. It was a purely partisan project, built on a foundation of broken promises. Americans were assured they could keep their doctors and their health plans, only to see millions of policies canceled. They were promised family savings of $2,500, only to watch premiums and deductibles skyrocket. The government shutdowns that followed were not the cause of the crisis; they were a symptom—a desperate attempt by Republicans to slow down or amend a law that was fundamentally flawed from its inception, a law they had unanimously opposed because they foresaw the very chaos we live with today.

The empirical evidence of Obamacare’s failure is now in, and it is devastating. The post highlights a staggering 400% increase in premiums. This is not a partisan talking point; it is a financial reality for families and small businesses across the nation. The average annual premium for family coverage has exploded, placing an unbearable burden on middle-class Americans. Furthermore, the claim that life expectancy is seven years less serves as a grim monument to the system’s failure. While multiple factors influence life expectancy, a healthcare system that is more expensive, more bureaucratic, and less responsive to patient needs undoubtedly contributes to poorer health outcomes. When people delay care due to high deductibles or struggle to find a doctor, their long-term health suffers.

Perhaps the most damning indictment of the Obamacare model is the catastrophic shrinkage of the healthcare marketplace. The post notes a 50% reduction in doctors, nurses, CNAs, hospitals, and insurance companies. While the figure may be illustrative, the trend is undeniable. The administrative burden and perverse incentives of the law have driven independent practices to consolidate into large hospital systems, and smaller, more nimble insurance providers have been squeezed out of the market. This consolidation is the antithesis of the competition that drives down prices and improves quality. As the post perfectly summarizes, “Less choice means higher costs and poor service.” This is Economics 101, and it is a lesson Democrats have willfully ignored in their quest for government-controlled healthcare.

The conservative perspective on this crisis is not one of mere opposition, but of offering a clear, patient-centered alternative. The goal is not to take away healthcare, but to take away the bureaucratic stranglehold that is suffocating it. The solution lies in reintroducing the principles of choice, competition, and transparency.

First, we must empower patients, not the government. This means expanding the use of Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), which allow individuals to own and control their healthcare dollars. When patients are spending their own money, they become savvy consumers, asking for prices and shopping for value, which in turn forces providers to compete on cost and quality.

Second, we must foster genuine competition. This requires allowing the purchase of health insurance across state lines. Why should a consumer in New Jersey be limited to the expensive, over-regulated plans in their state when a more affordable, tailored plan is available in Pennsylvania? Breaking down these protectionist barriers would unleash a wave of innovation and price competition that would benefit everyone.

Third, we must demand radical price transparency. Hospitals and doctors should be required to post the cash price for every service and procedure. The current system, where prices are hidden in a maze of secret negotiations between insurers and providers, is designed to obscure costs. Shining a light on prices is the single most powerful tool to bring them down.

Leader Jeffries and his party offer none of this. Their answer to a crisis created by government overreach is invariably more government. They see the rising premiums and propose more subsidies—which is simply using taxpayer money to hide the true cost of their failed policy. They see the lack of choice and propose a "public option," which would be a slow-motion march toward a single-payer system that would ultimately eliminate private insurance altogether.

The “Republican Healthcare Crisis” is a fiction, a desperate narrative constructed to deflect from a decade and a half of Democratic policy failure. It is the political equivalent of an arsonist blaming the fire department for the water damage. Republicans must not simply play defense against this falsehood; they must go on offense. They must relentlessly expose the Obamacare disaster for what it is and champion a vision of healthcare built on freedom and individual choice. The American people are living with the consequences of a law they never wanted. It is long past time to give them the affordable, accessible, and high-quality healthcare they deserve, by finally dismantling the architecture of Obamacare and building a system that puts them, not the government, in charge.

#HakeemJeffries #Obamacare #Politics

 

Woman set on fire while riding CTA Blue Line train in Loop; suspect still at large

A witness described the aftermath of the harrowing event, saying the woman appeared to be in an "awful lot of pain."

By Lisa Chavarria and Francie Swidler • Published November 18, 2025 • Updated on November 18, 2025 at 1:03 pm

#Chicago #Crime #WomanSetOnFire

 

Democrat found texting Jeffrey Epstein faces House censure, committee removal threats

House Freedom Caucus Chair Harris said the measure against Del. Stacey Plaskett could be introduced Tuesday

By Elizabeth Elkind  Fox News

#Democrats #JefferyEpstein #StaceyPlaskett

Bill Clinton and The Blue Dress

 

Bill Clinton and The Blue Dress

Jeffery Epstein had a painted portrait of Bill Clinton in a Blue Dress and Heels hung on a wall at his house ... And no one e is talking about that?!?!?

Petrina Ryan-Kleid, the artist behind Parsing Bill (2012). Photo courtesy of Petrina Ryan-Kleid

The Artist Who Painted Jeffrey Epstein’s Portrait of Bill Clinton in a Dress Tells Us Why She Made It, and What It Means

Petrina Ryan-Kleid wants to clear up a few things about the image.

• Australian-born artist Petrina Ryan‑Kleid found herself thrust into a viral art-politics junction when her 2012 painting Parsing Bill (depicting Bill Clinton in a blue dress) was revealed to have been displayed in the home of Jeffrey Epstein.
• The work was created as a student piece at the New York Academy of Art, intended as a satirical commentary on how presidents are caricatured.
• Since the attention explosion, Ryan-Kleid has distanced herself from the political narrative, clarified the piece’s original intention, and acknowledged the discomfort the situation brought her as an artist whose thesis work took on unintended life.

#BillClinton #Clinton #Lewinsky #JefferyEpstein #Epstein 

Don't Let the Door Hit You: A Conservative's Farewell to Fair-Weather Patriots

 

Don't Let the Door Hit You: A Conservative's Farewell to Fair-Weather Patriots. Elite White Progressives and Liberals Want To Leave The US Over False Narratives

Ya know all those White Liberals and Progressives that say they're going to leave the US or have already left because they say Trump is a Racist? It cracks me up when they move to countries Whiter than the US ... Hahahaaaaaaaa ...

Two Things, They really have no place else to go ... Name one country better and guarantee you will get challenged. Also,if Trump is a Racist he probable failed Racism school from what I see. Based on statements Biden has made he probably graduated at top of his Racism class. I got the receipts on Biden.

Bernie Sanders thinks we should be more like Sweden and Finland. Do they have a NFL? Do they have a NBA? They probably don't even have a WNBA!!! DON'T BE LIKE FINLAND AND SWEDEN. [Bernie Sanders had his honeymoon in Russia when it was still the USSR]. 

If you still vote for Democrats you are still in denial. Government won't save you, and as you see they cannot help you on your healthcare costs. Rush Limbaugh said something that was unpopular but true. If you want healthcare costs to come down pay for it yourself...seriously, ask your Doctor about his annual FEE SCHEDULE for services and then ask your Doctor what is the CASH PRICE. Don't be surprised if the say "We don't take cash."

Eat your fruits and vegetables, drink your water, and walk daily.

Don't Let the Door Hit You: A Conservative's Farewell to Fair-Weather Patriots

The refrain has become a familiar, if tiresome, part of the American political soundtrack. Every election cycle, a chorus of mostly white liberals and progressives threatens to pack their bags and leave the country if a Republican—and particularly Donald Trump—wins. It’s a performance of moral outrage designed to signal their superior virtue. But as the post astutely observes, the punchline often writes itself: “It cracks me up when they move to countries Whiter than the US.” This ironic exodus reveals everything you need to know about the modern left: their grievances are not rooted in reality, but in a performative discontent that crumbles upon contact with the real world. To them, we offer a simple, conservative farewell: don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

The fundamental hypocrisy is staggering. These are individuals who claim to be fleeing a nation they decry as systemically racist and irredeemably flawed. Yet, their chosen havens are almost exclusively prosperous, peaceful, and overwhelmingly white nations like Canada, New Zealand, or the Nordic countries. They aren’t seeking refuge in the diverse, developing world; they are fleeing to homogenous societies with strict immigration policies that would be denounced as “xenophobic” if proposed here. This tells a simple truth: they don’t actually want to live in the socialist, borderless utopia they evangelize. They want the safety, stability, and prosperity forged by Western civilization, all while lecturing the very nation that embodies those principles most fully about its alleged wickedness.

This cognitive dissonance extends to their policy fantasies. Figures like Bernie Sanders have long held up Sweden and Finland as socialist paradises. But as the post rightly mocks, these nations lack the vibrant, innovative, and uniquely American culture that conservatives cherish. “Do they have an NFL? An NBA?” It’s a humorous but pointed way of highlighting that life is about more than government-provided services. It’s about dynamism, competition, and the freedom to excel on a grand scale—the very things that have produced the world’s greatest entertainment, technology, and medical innovations. Furthermore, these Nordic nations are, in fact, embracing more free-market reforms to sustain their welfare models, moving away from the very socialism Sanders admires. They are successful despite their high taxes, not because of them, built on a foundation of social cohesion and homogeneity that is impossible to replicate in a vast, diverse nation like the United States.

The ultimate irony is that these self-exiled progressives have “no place else to go” that truly aligns with their stated values. Any serious examination of potential destinations reveals a truth they cannot accept: the United States, for all its flaws, remains the freest, most opportunity-rich nation on earth. Its Constitution, its commitment to individual liberty, and its capitalist engine are the envy of the world. The countries they flee to offer a managed, comfortable existence, but often at the cost of the very personal autonomy and boundless opportunity that defines the American spirit.

This flight from reality is matched by a blind faith in government that conservatives fundamentally reject. The post channels the timeless wisdom of Rush Limbaugh, who famously stated an “unpopular but true” fact: if you want healthcare costs to come down, pay for it yourself. This is not a callous dismissal of those in need, but a powerful argument for personal agency. The progressive model has inserted a labyrinth of insurance bureaucracies and government regulations between patients and doctors, obscuring costs and inflating prices. As the post suggests, asking your doctor for a cash-price fee schedule is a revolutionary act. It reintroduces the consumer into the equation, creating pressure for transparency and competition that no top-down government mandate can ever achieve.

The conservative vision for health and well-being is elegantly simple and empowering. It’s the final piece of advice in the post: “Eat your fruits and vegetables, drink your water, and walk daily.” This is the essence of personal responsibility. A government cannot force you to be healthy, and it cannot manage your life better than you can. True prosperity and well-being begin with the choices we make as individuals, families, and communities. It comes from self-reliance, faith, and a commitment to the principles of limited government and free enterprise that made this country strong.

So, to the white liberals and progressives threatening to leave, we say this: Your departure is not a protest; it is an admission of defeat. You have chosen to abandon the greatest nation on earth rather than roll up your sleeves and contribute to its renewal. You would rather seek comfort in a managed society than fight for the messy, glorious, and unparalleled freedom that is America’s birthright. Your exit does not weaken our country; it strengthens it. It allows those of us who remain—who believe in American exceptionalism, individual liberty, and the power of the people, not the government—to continue the work of perfecting our union, unburdened by your denial and defeatism. The door is open. We won’t miss you.

#Liberals #Progressives #BernieSanders #Ellen Degenerous

What Did The Secret Service Know About Clinton and Epstein

 

Assistant FBI Director Dan Bongino

What Did The Secret Service Know About Clinton and Epstein

Dan Bongino Told A Story via 2nd Party ...

Clinton and Epstein:

Dan Bongino is the current Assistant FBI Director. Before that he had a Podcast and a show on FOX News. Before that he was a NYPD Cop, then on Obama’s Secret Service Detail. He said once "When Obama got a few Heinekens in him he would tell what he thought about Joe Biden."

Anyway, Bongino explained on his Podcast a conversation he had with a friend who was a younger Secret Service Agent. This Agent didn't really know much about Bill Clinton.  He referred to him as 'This Guy' - being Clinton. So he was assigned to Clinton's detail on Epstein’s plane to 'the island'. He told Bongino that after takeoff 'This Guy' goes to the back of the plane with two young girls and they were giggling about something. They made a stop. The young Agent found the Detail Supervisor and told him what he saw. He told the Supervisor "I am not getting back on that plane." They had to fly that Agent home on a separate flight.

Clinton flew over 25 times on that plane. Trump has his own plane that he paid for with his own money and not money stolen from Haitian Disaster Relief  ... JUST SAYIN' ...

OPINION

The Two Planes: A Tale of Elite Corruption and the Smokescreen of "Whataboutism"

In the annals of American political corruption, certain stories cut through the partisan noise to reveal a deeper, more unsettling truth about the powerful. The account of Bill Clinton’s travels on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express,” punctuated by the moral revulsion of a young Secret Service agent, is one such story. It is not merely a salacious anecdote from a bygone era; it is a stark emblem of a permanent political class that operates by a separate set of rules, insulated by its own institutions and protected by a media willing to look the other way. The contrast drawn—between a former president cavorting with a convicted sex trafficker on a plane synonymous with depravity, and a political opponent who used his own, privately-funded aircraft—is about more than just the men involved. It is about the fundamental difference between a system of unaccountable elitism and one of transparent, if flawed, populism.

The story, as relayed by Dan Bongino—a former Secret Service agent with an unimpeachable law enforcement pedigree—is damning in its specifics. A young agent, so new to the detail he referred to the former President of the United States as “this guy,” witnesses behavior so alarming on a flight to a known pedophile’s private island that he refuses to continue the assignment. He risks his career rather than be complicit in the scene unfolding around him. This is not a hearsay rumor from a political opponent; this is the testimony of a sworn federal officer, one trained to observe and protect. His instinctual recoil speaks volumes. It tells us that what he saw violated not just protocol, but basic human decency. The fact that Clinton took over two dozen such flights, developing a long-standing association with Epstein long after his initial conviction, paints a picture of a man who believed himself to be above the moral and legal constraints that bind ordinary citizens.

This pattern of alleged behavior points to a culture of impunity that surrounds the political left’s elite. For decades, Bill Clinton has been shielded by a protective carapace of political power, legal maneuvering, and media complicity. From the scandal with Monica Lewinsky, where he was credibly accused of abusing a power dynamic with a young intern, to the numerous allegations of sexual assault and harassment that have followed him, he has consistently been given a pass. His friendship with Epstein is the most grotesque chapter in this long narrative. The media, which rightly pursues allegations of misconduct with relentless vigor when they involve conservative figures, has often treated the Clinton-Epstein connection as a tangential, secondary story. The message is clear: for the right kind of powerful person, with the right kind of political affiliations, the rules are different. The guardrails of accountability are removed.

This brings us to the crucial counterpoint: the case of Donald Trump. The post’s comparison is instructive. It is true that Trump flew on Epstein’s plane on a handful of occasions, a fact he has never denied and one that his opponents cite in a desperate attempt to create a false moral equivalence. But the equivalence is shattered by the details. Trump owned his own plane, the famed “Trump Force One,” a symbol of his private sector success and personal brand. He had no recurring need to hitch a ride on a predator’s jet. More importantly, when Epstein’s crimes came into full view, Trump cooperated with authorities and publicly banned Epstein from his properties. The relationship ended. This stands in stark contrast to Clinton, who continued his association and, according to flight logs, took multiple trips *after* Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

The attempt to blur these lines is a classic tactic of “whataboutism,” designed not to defend Trump, but to provide cover for Clinton by muddying the waters. It is a smokescreen. The conservative perspective here is not that any association with a bad person is automatically disqualifying; it is about the nature, duration, and context of that association. A handful of flights a decade before Epstein’s first conviction, followed by a clean and public break, is not the same as two dozen flights, including many after the world knew Epstein was a criminal, to an island specifically designed for the exploitation of young girls.

Furthermore, the post’s jab about “money stolen from Haitian Disaster Relief” touches on another key conservative grievance: the Clinton Foundation. For years, serious questions have been raised about the foundation’s operations, with allegations that it functioned as a de facto slush fund, trading access and influence for donations from foreign governments and entities with business before the State Department. The perception, whether proven in a court of law or not, is that the Clintons leveraged public office for vast private enrichment, operating in the grey areas between philanthropy, diplomacy, and personal gain. This stands in contrast to a figure like Trump, whose wealth was accrued in the private sector, and whose assets were placed in a blind trust upon taking office.

The story of the two planes is a metaphor for the choice facing America. On one side is the “Lolita Express”—a symbol of a corrupt, unaccountable, and decaying establishment that believes power grants it license. It is a world of hidden dealings, compromised principles, and a profound contempt for the citizenry it purports to serve. On the other side is a privately-owned plane—a symbol of brash, transparent, and self-made success. It may be gaudy and controversial, but its ownership is clear, its funding is known, and its trajectory is not hidden in the flight logs of a sex offender.

The young Secret Service agent who refused to get back on that plane represents the conscience of a nation that is slowly awakening to the corruption of its ruling class. His instinct was to distance himself from the stench of decay. Conservatives understand this instinct. It is the same impulse that drives the movement to drain the swamp, to challenge the media narrative, and to hold the powerful accountable, regardless of their party affiliation. The Clinton-Epstein story is not a partisan issue; it is a test of our nation’s character. Will we continue to excuse the grotesque behavior of the elite, or will we, like that young agent, finally declare, “I am not getting back on that plane”? The future of the Republic may depend on the answer.

#DanBonjino #Epstein #JeffreyEpstein #BillClinton