Noble Gold
NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK
Real Time US National Debt Clock | USA Debt Clock.com
Share this site:
Copyright 1987-2024
| United States National Debt | |
| United States National Debt Per Person | |
| United States National Debt Per Household | |
| Total US Unfunded Liabilities | |
| Social Security Unfunded Liability | |
| Medicare Unfunded Liability | |
| Prescription Drug Unfunded Liability | |
| National Healthcare Unfunded Liability | |
| Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Person | |
| Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Household | |
| United States Population |
Copyright 1987-2024
(last updated 2024-08-09/Close of previous day debt was $35123327978028.47 )
4/25/26
The LEFT Hates America
The LEFT Hates America:
The Muslim Mayor Mamdani of NYC is banning gatherings of more than 20 people on the 4th of July. California is banning fireworks in the LBC on July 4th because they say it can harm the ocean. That is BS. I went to the LBC fireworks event several times. It was a hoot. You have boats all in the water watching the display. There were tons of people on the beach shooting off their own fireworks. It looked and sounded like a military beach raid.
Another thing, Long Beach has the dirtiest water of all the beaches in Southern California. Seal Beach and Huntington Beach to the south in the OC, and Redondo Beach, Venice Beach, and Del Rey to the north has clean blue water. The world surfing championships have been held in Huntington Beach. The reason the water us dirty in Long Beach is because that is the location of The Port Of Los Angeles.
They have break walls in the water to slow the waves for the ships. Therefore the water is stagnant. It doesn't move and what comes out of the ships along with whatever washes up stays there. No one surfs in Long Beach. They have no waves. However, the LEFT ignores that and simply want to pee on your party.
The LEFT doesn't want you to have fun. They hate America.
"We are going to fundamentally change America." ~ Barack Obama
#Democrats #LEFT #politicalLEFT #4thofJuly #Hate #America
Why the Left Hates America: The War on Our Celebration
The book is nearly a quarter-century old, but Daniel J. Flynn’s polemic, *Why the Left Hates America: Exposing the Lies That Have Obscured Our Nation's Greatness*, reads less like a time capsule and more like a prophetic playbook. Published in the wake of 9/11, Flynn’s thesis was blunt: a certain faction of the political Left, distinct from patriotic liberals, views the United States not as a flawed but noble experiment in liberty, but as an inherently corrupt, irredeemable force for global oppression. This "anti-American Left," as Flynn describes it, seeks to sabotage the very symbols of national unity and greatness. Two decades later, we aren't just seeing this play out in academic lecture halls or fringe protests. We are seeing it codified into public policy by the very people we elected.
Look no further than the Fourth of July, 2026. Independence Day, the commemoration of our nation’s birth, the 250th anniversary of the United States of America, is under active bureaucratic assault from coast to coast. In New York City and Long Beach, California, the message is clear: your patriotism is problematic.
The Mamdani Mandate: Silencing the Celebration in the Big Apple
In New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani has become the textbook example of the joyless scold Flynn warned us about. Under his administration, the public has been banned from attending the iconic Times Square ball drop on July 4th, a celebration of America's Semiquincentennial . The official justification often revolves around public safety logistics, but the pattern of hostility is undeniable. When New York City Council members from both parties proposed a ticker-tape parade for the Artemis II astronauts a unifying, uplifting celebration of American exceptionalism the council feared the Mayor would "throw a wet blanket" on the event, labeling him a “party-pooper”.
But the most staggering, and frankly un-American, policy is the reported ban on gatherings of more than 20 people on the 4th of July. Let that sink in. A nation founded on the principle that we the people can peaceably assemble is being told by a socialist mayor that you can’t gather with your neighbors to celebrate our founding because of a vague, weaponized concern for public order. This is freedom, but only in designated, pre-approved, bite-sized portions. It continues the post-COVID trend of using government mandates to atomize society, discourage community cohesion, and replace a shared national identity with isolated, manageable individuals. Why the Left hates America is because, to them, a spontaneous gathering of flag-waving patriots is a threat; a single-file, masked collective following a state-approved script is their idea of progress. Flynn argued that the Left is fine with dissent that serves its agenda but views American pride as an act of subversion. Mamdani is proving him right in real-time.
Long Beach’s Authoritarian Environmentalism: Dousing the Fire of Freedom
If New York represents the ideological war on patriotism, Long Beach, California, represents the bureaucratic one. The Golden State, where I’ve personally witnessed the glory of the "Big Bang on the Bay" fireworks show, is extinguishing a beloved tradition. The California Coastal Commission has effectively canceled the fireworks display, demanding a transition to drones because they allegedly have less environmental impact on the ocean .
This is pure, unadulterated humbug. The event organizer, John Morris, has presented a decade’s worth of water quality testing data showing no significant pollution or impact on wildlife from the fireworks . The environmental argument is a pretext. The truth, visible to anyone with eyes, is that Long Beach’s water quality issues stem from a far more mundane but massive source: the Port of Los Angeles. Environmental groups themselves are suing the port, alleging routine violations of the Clean Water Act, including the discharge of untreated wastewater, fecal bacteria, and copper into San Pedro Bay
The breakwater built for the port creates a stagnant pool where pollution concentrates, leaving Long Beach with the dirtiest water in Southern California, incapable of producing the clean, surfable waves found in Seal Beach or Huntington Beach, a city that hosts actual world surfing championships.
The Left ignores this elephant in the room because it’s inconvenient. The port is commerce. It’s unions. It’s a complex, entrenched economic machine. Fireworks, on the other hand, are just... people having fun. People being loud. People celebrating their country. I’ve been there. I’ve seen boats filling the bay, families on the sand, and a cacophony of unofficial fireworks that sounded like a military beach raid. It was chaotic, beautiful, and profoundly American. And the Left wants to stamp it out because, at its core, such a raw, unmediated display of patriotic, patriotic joy doesn’t just harm the ocean their flimsy argument it harms *their* narrative. They’re not protecting the planet; they’re peeing on your party. The cost to transition to a sterile, quiet, government-approved drone show balloons from $40,000 to $200,000, a prohibitive cost that ensures the tradition’s death .
A Nation Worth Defending from Its Own Elites
So why does the Left hate America? As Flynn detailed, it’s because they view our foundational principles individual liberty, free markets, national pride as inherently sinful. The actions of Mayor Mamdani and the California Coastal Commission are not isolated incidents; they are part of a systematic effort to deconstruct the joyful, communal, and often loud expressions of American identity. They don't have to burn the flag in the streets. They can simply regulate away the reason you want to wave it.
The effort to ban gatherings is the effort to ban fellowship. The effort to kill fireworks is the effort to kill a tradition that binds a community, replacing it with a litigious, fragmented, and fearful existence. Flynn wrote that the Left’s big lie is that America’s greatness is a myth. The real lie being exposed today is that their regulatory overreach is about safety or the environment. It’s about control. It’s the manifestation of an ideology that views your 4th of July cookout, your flag, and your local fireworks show not as a celebration of liberty, but as a problem to be solved. And that is why they ultimately hate America—because a people who know how to celebrate their freedom are a people who will never willingly surrender it.
Officer Killed, Another Wounded in Shooting at Chicago Hospital; Suspect in Custody
Officer Killed, Another Wounded in Shooting at Chicago Hospital; Suspect in Custody
A routine prisoner transport turned deadly on Saturday morning when a suspect opened fire inside a Chicago hospital, killing one police officer and leaving another critically wounded. The shooting triggered a massive manhunt and a multi-hour lockdown of the medical facility.
Shooting Inside the Hospital
The incident occurred around 10:45 a.m. at Endeavor Health Swedish Hospital, located on the North Side of Chicago in the Lincoln Square neighborhood . According to law enforcement sources, two Chicago police officers were transporting a prisoner to or from the hospital for medical treatment before the individual was to be taken to jail for a separate offense .
During that transport, the suspect **managed to obtain a firearm and open fire**, striking both officers . One officer was shot in the head and later pronounced dead at a different area hospital. The second officer remains in critical condition .
Manhunt and Shelter-in-Place
In the chaos that followed the shooting, the suspect fled the hospital on foot and ran to a nearby home several blocks away, according to CBS News Chicago . The escape triggered an urgent manhunt, with authorities swarming the hospital and surrounding neighborhoods.
Alderman Andre Vasquez (40th Ward) urged residents in the vicinity to shelter in place and avoid the streets as police conducted their search . "THIS IS AN ACTIVE SITUATION!" Vasquez wrote on Facebook. "Please shelter in place if you are in the surrounding area or avoid the area" .
Suspect Apprehended
The manhunt concluded approximately one hour after the shooting, when authorities took the suspect into custody around noon . SWAT teams had surrounded the home where the suspect was believed to be hiding before the arrest was made .
Hospital Lockdown and Response
Endeavor Health Swedish Hospital was immediately placed on lockdown following the shooting. The hospital confirmed in a statement that the suspect had been brought in for treatment around 9 a.m. and was "escorted by law enforcement at all times" while inside the facility before the shooting occurred.
The hospital also noted that the individual was scanned for weapons upon arrival in accordance with standard public safety protocols. The lockdown was lifted by 2 p.m., though the campus remained closed while investigators processed the scene .
"No team members or patients were physically harmed as a result of this incident," Endeavor Health stated. "The safety of our patients and team members remains our top priority" .
What Police Know So Far
As of Saturday afternoon, authorities have confirmed the following key details:
- The shooting occurred during a prisoner transport at Swedish Hospital
- One officer has died; the second officer remains in critical condition
- The suspect has been taken into custody
- The hospital's lockdown has been lifted, though the campus remains closed
- The area surrounding the hospital is still blocked off as investigations continue
No further information about the suspect or potential charges has been released at this time.
Chicago Alderman Jim Gardiner shared a message on social media following the incident: "Please pray for our police officers"
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
#Chicago #POLICE #Officerkilled #Officerwounded
The LEFT Has Policies That Damage The Lives of The People They Claim To Save
The LEFT Has Policies That Damage The Lives of The People They Claim To Save:
When I was growing up a HS kid was able to get a job at a fast food restaurant, a grocery store, or mowing lawns. Today Democrats in cities with teens out of control complain that they don't have opportunities. The jobs teens used to have are now held by ILLEGALS. I saw it first hand in Long Beach, CA.
I met a Manager of a Jack In The Box down the street from my apartment. She was a nice lady. She was Latino. The counter and drive through workers were also Latino. I don't know or cared about their legal status. I'll say this. I did taxes for a guy that was planning to change his name after he filed the taxes. I lived in Long Beach 16 out of 17 years while in California. When I left that same crew at Jack In The Box was still there.
The Democrats claim to care about Urban youth, claim they don't have opportunity and blame that for their bad behavior, and don't recognize that their border policies reduce the youth's opportunities.
#Jobs #Illegals #youth #urban #Democrats
4/24/26
Gun News
powered by Surfing Waves
GUN DIGEST
#guns #2ndAmendment
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
Domestic Violence Prevention
#domesticviolence #crime
Human Trafficking
Help is available Speak with someone today National Human Trafficking Hotline Hours: 24 hours, 7 days a week. Languages: English, Spanish. Learn more 888-373-7888
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
#humantrafficking #crime
Locate The International Space Station
#ISS #InternationalSpaceStation
Locate The International Space Station
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
powered by Surfing Waves
The Carter Doctrine's First Victim: How the Shah of Iran Was Abandoned
The Carter Doctrine's First Victim: How the Shah of Iran Was Abandoned
From a conservative perspective, the fall of the Shah of Iran represents one of the most catastrophic foreign policy failures in modern American history. While left-leaning historians often portray the Iranian Revolution as an inevitable popular uprising, the conservative critique argues something far more damning: the Shah's downfall was not inevitable at all. Rather, it was a preventable tragedy precipitated directly by the Carter administration's misguided policies, vacillating leadership, and a naive human rights agenda that fundamentally misunderstood the nature of the Cold War world.
The Man and the Moment
To understand how Jimmy Carter "lost" Iran, one must first understand what Iran represented. The Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was no mere despot. He was a stalwart American ally whose reign transformed a feudal backwater into a modernizing regional power. Under the Nixon Doctrine, Iran had become America's surrogate policeman in the Persian Gulf, a critical bulwark against Soviet expansionism and a reliable supplier of oil to the West . The Shah's Iran was, as Carter himself famously declared on New Year's Eve 1977, "an island of stability in one of the more troubled regions of the world" . That toast would soon become a cruel irony.
The conservative argument is not that the Shah was without flaws. Every honest observer knew his regime had authoritarian elements. But in the Cold War calculus, the question was never whether an ally was perfect it was whether the alternative would be worse. Jeane Kirkpatrick, the future Reagan ambassador to the United Nations, would capture this reality in her seminal 1979 essay "Dictatorships and Double Standards." She argued devastatingly that Carter's pressure on friendly autocrats to reform had "actively collaborated in the replacement of moderate autocrats friendly to American interests with less friendly autocrats of extremist persuasion". This was not hindsight speaking; it was a warning issued in real time that went unheeded.
Human Rights as a Weapon Against an Ally
The Carter administration arrived in Washington in 1977 determined to distinguish itself from the amoral realism of the Nixon-Kissinger era. The centerpiece of this new approach was a human rights policy that established a new Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs at the State Department, led by Carter's deputy campaign chair, Patricia Derian . In theory, elevating moral principles in foreign policy sounded admirable. In practice, as applied to Iran, it proved disastrous.
The Shah found himself in an impossible position. Carter's public pressure for liberalization encouraged his domestic opponents while simultaneously undermining his confidence in American backing. A State Department officer who served in Iran at the time, John Stempel, later detailed how the activist human rights bureau "eroded" the Shah's support in the United States. "Public pressure from the Carter administration's human rights policy merely created an uncertainty in his mind which killed human rights in Iran for a generation," Stempel wrote . The Shah, facing a growing revolutionary movement, "couldn't make up his mind between coercion and conciliation" precisely because he could no longer be sure Washington had his back.
One telling example: the State Department delayed the delivery of tear gas to Iran for nine months at the insistence of the Human Rights bureau. The result? "The alternative to tear gas was bullets, which were later used with lethal effect" . This is the bitter fruit of moral preening divorced from strategic reality worse outcomes for everyone, including the Iranian people the human rights advocates claimed to champion.
A Man Abandoned
As protests mounted throughout 1978, the Carter administration's signals became increasingly mixed. The president who had toasted the Shah's greatness barely a year earlier now could not decide whether to support the embattled monarch or pressure him to step aside. The Britannica account notes bluntly that "Carter was unable to choose between personal loyalty toward an old ally and the moral argument on behalf of reform or abdication" . In the crucible of revolution, such indecision was fatal.
When the Shah finally fled Iran in January 1979, a long-standing American ally was effectively exiled. But the betrayal continued. When the Shah, now dying of cancer, required medical treatment, Carter initially refused him entry to the United States, fearing it would offend the new revolutionary government. His national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, along with Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, had to lobby the president intensely before Carter relented on humanitarian grounds in October 1979 . Kissinger shamed the administration for treating a longtime ally "like a Flying Dutchman looking for a port of call" .
The admission of the Shah for medical treatment triggered the very crisis the administration had feared: the seizure of the American embassy and the taking of 52 American hostages . Yet even this catastrophe could be traced back to Carter's earlier failures. Had the Shah never been undermined and abandoned, had the administration maintained consistent support for its ally throughout 1978, the revolution might well have been contained or avoided entirely.
The Intelligence Failure
Compounding the policy errors was a staggering intelligence failure. The United States maintained one of its largest CIA stations in the world in Tehran, along with a well-staffed embassy and consulates in multiple cities. Thousands of American military personnel worked alongside their Iranian counterparts. Yet somehow, this extensive network completely missed the gathering storm.
The CIA relied heavily on the Shah's own secret police for intelligence, receiving a predictably biased picture of the domestic situation. Reports of social strife were downplayed or dismissed by an embassy intent on supporting the Shah. When one proactive consul reported a mutiny plot at a local air force base, the ambassador threatened to destroy his career. The State Department's Iran desk officer, Henry Precht, infamously described Ayatollah Khomeini as "a moderate".
The depth of this intelligence failure reflects poorly on the administration that presided over it. Carter had made human rights the centerpiece of his foreign policy, yet his own government failed utterly to understand the nature of the forces that would replace the Shah. The religious fundamentalism of Khomeini was not a democratic movement; it was a theocratic revolution that would prove far more repressive than the monarchy it replaced.
The Geopolitical Aftermath
The consequences of losing Iran were staggering and long-lasting. A critical Cold War ally was replaced by a regime that declared America the "Great Satan" and held our diplomats hostage for 444 days. The oil shock that followed the revolution caused prices to spike dramatically, compounding the economic misery of the Carter years. The humiliating failure of Operation Eagle Claw, the aborted hostage rescue mission in April 1980, saw eight American servicemen die in the desert without ever reaching their objective.
Politically, the hostage crisis doomed Carter's re-election. Every night, American television displayed the count of days the hostages had been held, a constant reminder of presidential impotence. The crisis persisted until minutes after Ronald Reagan was inaugurated the Iranians, it seemed, understood that a new, tougher administration had arrived.
The longer-term consequences proved even more severe. Khomeini's Iran became a consistent strategic rival, sponsoring terrorism, destabilizing neighbors, and pursuing nuclear weapons capability. The American alliance with the Shah's Iran had served as a stabilizing force in the region for decades; its collapse unleashed forces that bedevil American policy to this day.
The Conservative Lesson
The fall of the Shah was not, as Carter's defenders maintain, the result of historical forces beyond any president's control. It was the direct consequence of an administration that elevated abstract moral posturing over concrete strategic interests, that pressured allies while appeasing adversaries, and that proved unable to distinguish between imperfect friends and implacable enemies.
The conservative approach to foreign policy, as articulated by Kirkpatrick and later implemented by Reagan, learned from this debacle. It recognized that the perfect must not become the enemy of the good, that abandoning allies in the name of human rights frequently leads to worse human rights outcomes, and that American credibility once lost is extraordinarily difficult to regain. Carter's handling of Iran was not merely a failure of execution; it was a failure of conception, rooted in a worldview that could not accommodate the hard choices required of a great power in a dangerous world. The Shah fell, Iran was lost, and the Iranian people exchanged one form of tyranny for a far more brutal one all on Jimmy Carter's watch.
#Iran #Carter #Shah #ShahofIran #MiddleEast
4/23/26
The Playbook Isn’t for the Stands: A Conservative Perspective on Secrecy, Sovereignty, and the Iranian Crisis
The Playbook Isn’t for the Stands: A Conservative Perspective on Secrecy, Sovereignty, and the Iranian Crisis
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IN IRAN?
Everyone says they don't know or understand what is going on in Iran. They say they don't know the details. You're not supposes to know. If you wanna know the details GO SIGN UP AND SUIT UP!!! Then you will know! It's not your BUSINESS to know. Do the people in the stands have the PLAYBOOK? NO! THEY DON'T CALL THE PLAYS ... You're not supposed to KNOW WHAT THE MILITARY TACTICS ARE!!!
In an age of hyper-information, where every intelligence digest is filtered through a partisan lens and every global tremor generates a thousand hot takes before breakfast, a blunt, unpolished meme has surfaced that cuts through the noise. The post reads: “YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IN IRAN? Everyone says they don't know or understand what is going on in Iran. They say they don't know the details. You're not supposes to know. If you wanna know the details GO SIGN UP AND SUIT UP!!! Then you will know! It's not your BUSINESS to know. Do the people in the stands have the PLAYBOOK? NO! THEY DON'T CALL THE PLAYS.”
While the grammar is rough, the vernacular is deliberately aggressive, and the military cosplay is overt, the sentiment encapsulates a foundational conservative principle that has been largely abandoned by the modern, perpetually outraged political class: the principle of the civil-military divide, the necessity of operational security, and the moral requirement to trust the chain of command when the trumpets of war are sounding.
From a conservative perspective, this viral statement is more than just a dismissal of armchair quarterbacks; it is a defense of the very architecture of sovereign national defense. It is a call to return to a culture where the ordinary citizen understands that their role in a republic is not to micromanage the commander-in-chief, but to provide the moral, economic, and material support for the warriors who do.
The Pathology of the Stands
We live in a political era defined by what the philosopher Roger Scruton called “the unlicensed spectator.” Every cable news channel is full of retired generals turned pundits, every social media feed is curated by geo-political “experts” who haven’t read a single diplomatic cable, and every congressional hearing becomes a stage for senators to demand classified information in an unclassified setting to score points with the base. We demand to see the playbook, but we refuse to put on the pads.
The Iranian situation is the perfect case study in this pathology. Since the fall of the Shah and the hostage crisis of 1979, Iran has been the West’s most persistent geopolitical adversary. It is a regime that doesn't just play by different rules; it plays an entirely different sport, one where martyrdom operations, proxy warfare, and strategic patience are the primary tools. Yet, whenever a crisis escalates whether it is the killing of Qasem Soleimani, the seizure of British-flagged tankers, or the current shadow war of nuclear breakout the immediate reaction from a certain segment of the population and the media is, “We need to know exactly what the intelligence says to justify this,” or conversely, “We haven’t been told enough, therefore the threat is manufactured.”
The conservative rebuttal to this is harsh but necessary: The threat is classified because it has to be. The Iranian regime is a sophisticated actor. They are not only experts in reverse-engineering American drone technology; they are experts in reading the American press. To broadcast our sources, methods, and red lines is to hand Tehran a strategic advantage on a silver platter. As the post bluntly states, you are not supposed to know. The health of a republic does not depend on the electorate knowing the launch codes or the granular details of a Mossad liaison operation. It depends on the electorate trusting that the men and women they elected, and the professionals they appointed, are acting with the nation’s survival in mind.
The Volunteer Class and the Moral Contract
The phrase “Go sign up and suit up” is the rhetorical backbone of the post, and it taps into a deeply conservative understanding of citizenship. Since the transition to an all-volunteer force at the end of the Vietnam War, the United States and much of the Western world have operated under a specific moral contract. Less than 1% of the population serves in the armed forces. This tiny sliver of society has an overwhelming amount of skin in the game. They cannot quit during a bad news cycle. Their bodies and their psyches are on the line.
The conservative reverence for this reality holds that those who do not share the burden of the physical fight must share the burden of the moral and civic support. This is the logic of the “playbook” analogy. Football is a nearly perfect metaphor for this worldview. On game day, 70,000 people might pack a stadium, and millions watch on screens. They wear the jerseys, they paint their faces, and they scream for victory. But none of them are on the headset. None of them have dirt on their uniforms. If a coach calls a flea flicker on fourth and one, the fan might scream in horror. But the fan does not know that the cornerback is nursing a hamstring injury and the safety has biting eyes. The fan’s ignorance is not a defect; it is their station. Their sole duty is to yell until their voice gives out, not to demand to see the wristband.
Translating this to statecraft, the conservative position maintains that the civilian’s “station” is not to dictate target packages. It is to maintain the morale of the home front, to reject enemy propaganda, and to support the families left behind when the troops deploy. Demanding to know the details of a potential strike on an IRGC nuclear facility is not an act of democratic accountability; it can easily become an act of narcissism that compromises operational security. You have no right to know in real time simply to satisfy your curiosity or your anxiety.
The Biden Administration and the Transparency Trap
It must be stated clearly that the current administration has muddied these waters by failing the trust test. Conservatives have long been skeptical of the Biden foreign policy doctrine, which seems to oscillate between leaking concessions to the press to appease the progressive base and relying on punitive airstrikes to appease the moderate center. When the White House leaks that an attack is “imminent” or that proxy forces are “on the move,” they violate the very concept of the secret playbook. They put the intelligence community in a box, and they put troops in danger, all to shape a news cycle.
However, the failure of politicians to maintain the sanctity of the locker room does not grant the public a permanent right to the coach’s headset. On the contrary, it demands a political correction. A conservative restoration of foreign policy would mean a return to a posture of strength and silence. The slogan “Peace through strength” is incomplete; it should be “Peace through strength and strategic silence.” The Trump administration, despite its chaotic communication style, often benefited politically from the public’s surrender to this reality. When a strike happened, the conservative base largely responded not by demanding a 15-page legal brief proving the target was an imminent threat, but by recognizing the warrior ethos of the act. The message was: You don’t know what just happened, but the enemy does, and that is what matters.
The Stands Don’t Call the Plays, But They Can Leave the Stadium
The post’s final analogy is its most culturally damning. It implies a hierarchy, a pyramid of responsibility that the egalitarian, horizontal modern culture finds suffocating. The modern progressive impulse is to flatten all structures—to insist that academia, the media, and the civilian on Twitter are co-equal commanders in the war room. The conservative impulse is to hold the line on natural hierarchies rooted in responsibility. The coach has authority because he has the weight of the loss on his shoulders. The general has authority because his subordinates will pay with their lives for his mistakes.
We need to shatter the illusion that foreign policy is a reality TV show where the audience gets a vote. The post asserts that it is “not your BUSINESS to know.” This is legally and constitutionally correct. The Executive Branch controls the military and intelligence apparatus precisely because a committee of 330 million people cannot react in seconds to a hypersonic missile launch. The social contract of the conservative state is clear on this: You, the citizen, tend to your business—your family, your church, your local community, your trade. You empower the state to tend to the business of the sword. When the state operates within its legitimate bounds to protect the homeland, you stand back and provide the cover of unified national will.
If you despise not knowing the plays, the door is open. The military is desperately under-recruited. “Suit up,” as the post says. Enter the arena. Earn the security clearance. Once you have bled for the nation, once you have experienced the solar-plexus tightening terror of a missile warning siren, you will likely find that your hunger for public disclosure diminishes. You will understand that “the people in the stands” don’t get the playbook not because they are despised, but because the opponent is in the stands with them, listening with headphones, ready to steal the signals.
To the conservative, this is not authoritarianism; it is stewardship. It is the understanding that knowledge is not just power; it is a weapon. We lock up our guns so children cannot access them and hurt themselves. We must lock up our operational secrets so that a chronically online society, driven by a 24-hour news cycle addiction, cannot accidentally detonate a crisis through the careless demand for total transparency. Sit in the stands, cheer for the good guys, and let the warriors work in the shadows where they belong.
#Iran #MiddleEast #Iran #Israel
Physchology And Tattoos
.jpeg)
Physchology And Tattoos
In today's society a lot of people tend to misjudge tattoos. A lot of people who see someone with a lot of tattoos will automatically think negative thoughts. Those who have tattoos are just like anyone else - except for the fact that they wish to stand out and broadcast who they are, simply because they have a strong sense of who they are. Those with tattoos aren't afraid to show them, as they put them on their body to let others know who they are and what they are about.
Most who decide to look into the psychology of those with tattoos seem to associate them as criminals and study them like they are common rats in the cage. Contrary to this opinion that many experts have, those who have tattoos aren't in any type of cage. Instead, they are out there expressing their freedom. Whether they are going by what they believe, showing that they belong to a certain group or clan, or paying homage to the dearly departed - there are always meanings behind tattoos.
The psychologist who studies those with tattoos will normally try to get into their frame of mind, which is hard to do. For hundreds of years tattoos have always been a question from a psychological standpoint, with most people associating tattoos in the past with criminals. Even though criminals may have tattoos, there are just as many if not more people out there who are some of the friendliest people in the world who have them as well.
To look at tattoos from a psychological standpoint can sometimes be hypocritical. Although those who don't have tattoos will try and figure out why someone would want them, it can still be considered a psychological point of view. Those who have tattoos had a reason for getting them, or they wouldn't have got them in the first place.
No matter where you look these days it's a common thing to see someone with at least one tattoo. This doesn't mean that society is dwindling in any way, nor does it mean that mankind is becoming a bunch of clones following after one leader. Tattoos have built there own reputation over the years, gaining in popularity. Over the years more and more people have decided to get them which only goes to show the phenomenon that is tattoos.
When you decide to look at the psychology of tattoos, you must first understand some of the meanings. A tattoo can tell you a lot about the individual and his past. Although some tattoos may be a bit frightening, that individual may have got the tattoos in his past and turn out to be nothing like that now. Like others out there the tattoos that were obtained in the past may be left as a reminder for the future.
#tattoos #art #bodyart #psychology
New York Sports
.png)
New York Sports
New York City is most definitely a city that loves its sports and cheers for the home team. New York is probably the best represented city and state in this country when it comes to major league teams. I've never quite seen anything like it but I honestly can't imagine a night when there isn't some sort of major sporting event taking place somewhere in this great city.
The National Hockey League that almost wasn't is back and going strong. New York is represented well by the Ranger's who have made a wonderful deal this year to woo Shanahan away from the Red Wings. They play their home games at Madison Square Garden and have some of the most loyal fans. Even if you're say from Detroit and visiting, and if the Rangers are playing at home then it's the perfect opportunity (assuming you can get a ticket) to drop in and see how Shanahan is adjusting to life in the Big Apple and if he misses life back at the Joe.
Putting hockey aside for now, there are many other professional sports you can enjoy watching while you're visiting New York City. I think there are a few baseball fans in this city somewhere. I say a few because it seems that they had to create two baseball teams in order to contain all the fans. I will say though that these fans are loyal to a fault to the teams they support. The New York Mets and the New York Yankees represent this great city in Major League Baseball and both teams draw loyal support from all their fans.
The amazing thing to me is that the double-teaming didn't end with baseball. It seems that New York City also has two National Football League teams as well. The New York Giants and the New York Jets both represent this fair city to football fans across the country. While I have no favorite or even preference for all these teams and really have no idea how a city can survive with this sort of heated division. Obviously they aren't as rabid as some hockey fans can tend to be or there would be civil war within the streets.
All joking aside, it seems that so far there is only one NBA team and they are the New York Knicks. I won't go into how unfair it is to so improperly represent hockey and basketball because these guys might actually be getting the better end of the bargain-the entire city roots for them, not just half. With so many major sporting opportunities it's amazing that men in this city get anything at all accomplished without carrying a portable pocket television with them at all times.
I don't know about your house, but in my house it's difficult enough to schedule important events in our family lives around one local team for each sport (and we don't even have a baseball team). I can't imagine how women in New York do it. But to all of you women and the men you love, I have to say kudos for supporting your great teams and giving your many visitors such wonderful opportunities to watch our sports when we're away from home too. It's hard to identify one thing about this city that is the greatest but that just may be it.
#football #basketball #baseball #sports #New York #hockey
FOREX (Foreign Exchange Market)
.jpeg)
FOREX (Foreign Exchange Market)
The foreign exchange market is also known as FX or it is also found to be referred to as the FOREX. All three of these have the same meaning, which is the trade of trading between different companies, banks, businesses, and governments that are located in different countries. The financial market is one that is always changing leaving transactions required to be completed through brokers, and banks. Many scams have been emerging in the FOREX business, as foreign companies and people are setting up online to take advantage of people who don't realize that foreign trade must take place through a broker or a company with direct participation involved in foreign exchanges.
Cash, stocks, and currency is traded through the foreign exchange markets. The FOREX market will be present and exist when one currency is traded for another. Think about a trip you may take to a foreign country. Where are you going to be able to 'trade your money' for the value of the money that is in that other country? This is FOREX trading basis, and it is not available in all banks, and it is not available in all financial centers. FOREX is a specialized trading circumstance.
Small business and individuals often times looking to make big money, are the victims of scams when it comes to learning about FOREX and the foreign trade markets. As FOREX is seen as how to make a quick buck or two, people don't question their participation in such an event, but if you are not investing money through a broker in the FOREX market, you could easily end up losing everything that you have invested in the transaction.
Scams to be wary of
A FOREX scam is one that involves trading but will turn out to be a fraud; you have no chance of getting your money back once you have invested it. If you were to invest money with a company stating they are involved in FOREX trading you want read closely to learn if they are permitted to do business in your country. Many companies are not permitted in the FOREX market, as they have defrauded investors before.
In the last five years, with the help of the Internet, FOREX trading and the awareness of FOREX trading has become all the rage. Banks are the number one source for FOREX trading to take place, where a trained and licensed broker is going to complete transactions and requirements you set forth. Commissions are paid on the transaction and this is the usual.
Another type of scam that is prevalent in the FOREX markets is software that will aid you in making trades, in learning about the foreign markets and in practicing so you can prepare yourself for following and making trades. You want to be able to rely on a program or software that is really going to make a difference. Consult with your financial broker or your bank to learn more about FOREX trading, the FX markets and how you can avoid being the victim while investing in these markets.
#investing #money #forex #trading #markets
#gold #goldbars #goldcoins #preciousmetals
#silver #coins #preciousmetals #investing
Gerrymandering In Virginia
"Don't Hate The Player Hate The Game" ~ Snoop Dog
Gerrymandering, I get it. Both Parties do it. However, what Virginia did is over the top. Virginia was 6 Democrats to 5 Republicans. They had the most fairest voting and districting map in the country. Now they have gone 10 Democrats to 1 Republucan. The Governor campaigned as a 'Moderate' and like Biden, went straight LEFT after entering office. The rural areas in Virginia basically have no representation. And the DEMOCRATS call that fair. Republicans make up almost half of the state. Now they only have 1 out of 11 in representation. That isn't right regardless of party.
Although both parties do it, the Democrats have done it DIRTY for a long time. For example, all of the New England states are at least 40% Republican. None of those states have a Republican Representative. 40% of that part of the country have no one representing them. That isn't fair regardless of party.
DEMOCRACY???
Florida is about to hold a special session to cancel out Virginia. Playtime is over. Sad to see adults act this way and call themselves running the country. They change the rules more than the NFL.
#Virginia #Texas #Florida #California #Gerrymandering
SIDE NOTE:
It's backdoor Communism. Look what Virginia did yesterday. It went from 6 Dems to 5 Reps, now it's 10 to 1 Dems to Reps in a state that is 50/50. They lied in the campaign. They even lied on the ballot. California wants to ban gas cars in 20 years...or less.
Virginia Redistricting Referendum Results
.webp)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)