CPR

 

I have attended CPR classes over the years but was never told about this particular scenario. I was told that when your body starts sweating profusely for no apparent reason, followed by what feels like a spasm at the end of your esophagus, that is your body’s warning sign.

 When you are alone and have a heart attack, what are you gonna do? A really good post that can't be shared often enough:

1. Take a 2 minute break and read this:

Let's say it's 5:25 pm and you're driving home after an unusually hard day's work.

2. You are really tired and frustrated.

All of a sudden you experience chest pains. They are starting to radiate in the arm and jaw. It feels like being stabbed in the chest and heart. You're only a few miles away from the nearest hospital or home.

3. Unfortunately, you don't know if you can make it..

4. Maybe you've taken CPR training, but the person running the course hasn't told you how to help yourself.

5. How do you survive a heart attack when you're alone when it happens? A person who is feeling weak and whose heart is beating hard has only about 10 seconds before losing consciousness.

6. But you can help yourself by coughing repeatedly and very strongly! Deep breaths before every cough. Coughing should be repeated every second until you arrive at the hospital or until your heart starts to beat normally.

7. Deep breathing gives oxygen to your lungs and coughing movements boost the heart and blood circulation. Heart pressure also helps to restore a normal heartbeat. That’s how cardiac arrest victims can make it to the hospital for the right treatment.

8. Cardiologists say if someone gets this message and passes it on to 10 people, we can expect to save at least one life.

9. FOR WOMEN: You should know that women have additional and different symptoms. Rarely have crushing chest pain or pain in the arms. Often have indigestion and tightness across the back at the bra line plus sudden fatigue.  

Instead of posting jokes, you're helping save lives by spreading this message.

#CPR #HeartAttack #Health #Wellness

Karmelo Anthony found guilty of murder in fatal stabbing of Frisco student Austin Metcalf

 

Karmelo Anthony found guilty of murder in fatal stabbing of Frisco student Austin Metcalf

#Texas #Metcalf #Karmelo

What Are Data Centers, and Why Are They So Controversial?

 

What Are Data Centers, and Why Are They So Controversial?

Every time you stream a movie, consult a chatbot, or store a photo in the cloud, you are relying on a data center. These sprawling, humming warehouses of servers have become the unglamorous backbone of the digital economy. Yet as the AI race drives a construction boom, data centers are igniting fierce controversy. Are they essential economic engines or high-tech parasites? This article looks at what data centers are, what they hold, their colossal energy appetite, and the trade-offs they impose on the communities that host them.

What Are Data Centers?

At its simplest, a data center is a secure, climate-controlled building that houses the physical hardware servers, storage arrays, networking switches needed to run the internet, corporate software, and artificial intelligence. They range from a small server closet at a local business to “hyperscale” campuses covering 200 acres or more, owned by cloud giants like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google. Inside, thousands of server racks throw off immense heat. Powerful air conditioning, liquid cooling loops, and water evaporation systems run 24/7 to prevent crashes. Backup diesel generators and redundant power supplies guarantee near-constant uptime. Despite the ethereal term “the cloud,” the reality is a rapidly growing fleet of over 8,000 physical data centers worldwide.

What Data Do Data Centers Collect?

It’s a common misconception that data centers actively collect your personal information. In truth, they store and process the data generated by people, devices, and businesses. The digital detritus housed inside includes emails, social media posts, video streams, medical records, financial transactions, and the enormous datasets used to train AI models like ChatGPT. They also host operational data from factory sensors, smart grids, and IoT gadgets. The data center operator itself only logs technical metadata—temperatures, power draw, network traffic—to run the facility, not to mine customer content. Privacy regulations often require data to be stored in specific jurisdictions, which is why cloud providers scatter their data centers across the globe. Think of data centers as secure digital vaults and engine rooms, not spies.

How Much Power Do Data Centers Need?

If data is the new oil, data centers are the refineries—and they are ravenous. According to the International Energy Agency, data centers globally consumed an estimated 460 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2022, a figure that includes cryptocurrency mining and already surpasses the entire electricity demand of France. Thanks to the explosive growth of generative AI, that number could double to over 1,000 TWh by 2026. A single hyperscale campus can draw 100 megawatts or more enough to power roughly 80,000 typical U.S. homes. This soaring energy need is pushing utilities to delay coal-plant retirements and to build new natural gas peaker plants, undercutting decarbonization goals. Cooling the equipment is equally thirsty. A mid-sized 15-megawatt data center can evaporate millions of liters of water per day. Google’s data centers alone consumed an estimated 4.3 billion gallons of water in 2021, frequently in water-stressed regions. That thirst is increasingly a flashpoint.

The Controversy: More Than Just NIMBYism

The data center boom has ignited a series of bitter disputes that go far beyond simple “not in my backyard” resistance. In Northern Virginia home to the planet’s densest cluster of data centers transmission constraints forced the local utility to pause new connections in 2022. To accommodate future demand, power companies across the U.S. are keeping coal plants open and planning new gas plants, directly colliding with state climate targets. In Ireland, the grid operator warned that data centers could consume nearly 30% of the nation’s electricity by 2030, prompting the government to restrict new builds. Water use is another battlefield. In drought-plagued Chile, a Google data center project was halted after a court found it could deplete a critical aquifer. In Arizona, the city of Mesa approved a water-intensive facility despite chronic shortages, triggering lawsuits. Then there is the transformation of the landscape. Hyperscale data centers are windowless concrete boxes stretching across hundreds of acres, often replacing farmland or woodland. Residents in Loudoun County, Virginia, have reported noise disturbances from the unceasing low-frequency hum of cooling fans and vibrations from backup generators. Aesthetic blight and construction traffic have spawned vocal opposition groups.

Yet the most systemic controversy may be subsidies. U.S. states and counties compete fiercely to award data centers enormous tax breaks. Virginia exempts computer equipment from sales tax; Oregon’s enterprise zones can wipe out most property taxes for 15 years. Critics call it a race to the bottom, trading hundreds of millions in forgone public revenue for facilities that employ very few people. Additional concerns include diesel generator emissions, the carbon and mining footprint of server manufacturing, and mountains of e-waste churned out every three to five years.

Benefits and Detriments to Surrounding Communities

For local governments, the most immediate benefit is a surge in property tax revenue provided the facility hasn’t been granted a full abatement. Loudoun County, Virginia, collected more than $800 million in data center taxes in fiscal 2025, a windfall that has helped keep residential tax rates relatively low and fund top-tier public services. The construction phase brings a temporary infusion of jobs and demand for hotels, restaurants, and building suppliers. Infrastructure can improve: new power substations and high-speed fiber optic cables sometimes boost connectivity and grid resilience for neighboring homes. Some operators voluntarily fund community amenities like parks or libraries, and as some of the world’s largest corporate purchasers of renewable energy, they can accelerate local solar and wind development.

However, the detriments are severe. Surging electricity demand can push up rates for residents as utilities build costly new transmission and generation. In water-constrained regions, data centers compete directly with farms and households, driving up prices and prompting use restrictions. Noise is a chronic complaint cooling systems emit a constant 55–65 decibels at the property line, enough to disrupt sleep and violate noise laws. Property values next to data centers can suffer. There is also a steep opportunity cost: a 100-acre data center campus is land removed from possible housing, mixed-use development, or industries that create more long-term jobs. Unlike a manufacturing plant, a data center is a sealed, high-security island that brings zero foot traffic to Main Street and spawns no cluster of local suppliers. Its economic multiplier is exceptionally weak.

The Jobs Mirage: Do Data Centers Create Real Employment?

The jobs promise is one of the most contentious pieces of the data center puzzle. Politicians routinely tout “thousands of jobs,” but the reality is skewed heavily toward temporary construction work. A $1 billion campus does support 1,000 to 2,000 construction workers over two or three years electricians, pipefitters, concrete crews giving local trades a welcome boost. Once the ribbon is cut, however, the permanent workforce collapses. A standard hyperscale facility typically employs just 30 to 50 full-time technicians, security guards, and a few managers. Even a sprawling multi-building campus might sustain only 200–300 ongoing positions. Google’s data center in Pryor, Oklahoma, employs about 400 people after 15 years of expansion notable, but hardly transformative given over $4 billion in investment.

A 2021 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that data center openings in the U.S. did not lead to any significant net gain in local employment. The researchers suggested that the tax incentives and infrastructure demands may crowd out other economic activity. In too many cases, communities trade decades of tax exemptions for a handful of permanent jobs.

Toward a Balanced Future

Data centers are essential infrastructure for the digital age, enabling telemedicine, remote work, and scientific breakthroughs. But the industry’s current path straining grids, draining aquifers, and extracting huge tax concessions while creating few lasting jobs is not sustainable. A wave of innovations offers partial solutions: liquid immersion cooling, AI-driven energy optimization, siting near offshore wind farms, and piping waste heat into district heating systems. Some local governments now require new data centers to run on 100% renewable energy and to publicly report water usage. Going forward, communities and the industry must engage in a more honest accounting of trade-offs, ensuring that the physical machines powering our virtual lives truly co-invest in the places they call home.

#DataCenters #Tech #Technology

Coffee or Tea For You

 

Coffee or Tea For You:

Here is a comprehensive article on coffee versus tea, covering their origins, caffeine content, nutritional profiles, and health considerations.

The Eternal Brew: A Deep Dive into Coffee and Tea

Few rivalries in the culinary world are as ancient, passionate, and globally pervasive as the one between coffee and tea. These two beverages are not merely drinks; they are rituals, economic pillars, and for many, the essential lubricant that starts the day. Coffee, with its bold, smoky intensity, powers high-octane meetings and early mornings, while tea, in its serene, aromatic complexity, accompanies meditation, conversation, and quiet afternoons. But beyond culture and taste lies a fascinating matrix of chemistry, nutrition, and physiology. Understanding the differences in how they are derived, their caffeine mechanics, and their distinct nutritional benefits reveals that the “better” choice is not universal it is deeply personal, and sometimes, they are beneficial for different reasons to the very same person.

From Soil to Cup: The Art of Derivation

The journey of coffee and tea from plant to cup dictates everything about their chemical makeup. They start in similar equatorial belts but diverge completely in processing.

Coffee begins as the seed of a bright red fruit, often called a cherry, from the Coffea plant. The two dominant species are Arabica (Coffea arabica) and Robusta (Coffea canephora). The derivation process is one of extraction. The cherries are harvested, and the fruit flesh is removed through either a washed (wet) or natural (dry) process. What remains is a pale green, inert seed. The alchemy occurs during roasting, where intense heat triggers the Maillard reaction, transforming sugars and amino acids into the complex orchestra of over 1,000 volatile aromatic compounds. The bean swells, cracks, and darkens, developing oils that carry its signature flavor. The final beverage is a rapid aqueous extraction: hot water dissolves the soluble solids, gases, and oils from the finely ground roasted seeds under pressure or gravity.

Tea, by contrast, comes from the leaves of a single species, Camellia sinensis. Its astonishing diversity from the grassy notes of a Japanese Sencha to the smoky depth of a Lapsang Souchong is not from the seed but from the manipulation of the leaf post-harvest, specifically a process called oxidation. Black tea is fully oxidized; the leaves are withered, rolled to break cell walls, and allowed to undergo enzymatic browning, developing rich theaflavins and thearubigins. Green tea is heated soon after plucking steamed in Japan, pan-fired in China to deactivate the enzymes and preserve chlorophyll and catechins. Oolong tea is partially oxidized, living in a beautiful spectrum between the two. Unlike coffee’s seed-based fat and sugar metabolism, tea’s chemistry is a study of the leaf’s survival mechanism. The infusion is gentler, an extended steeping that coaxes out polyphenols and amino acids.

The Caffeine Conundrum: A Tale of Two Stimulants

Comparing caffeine content is notoriously tricky, as it varies by preparation, but the chemistry of the caffeine experience is fundamentally different. By weight, dry tea leaves contain more caffeine (roughly 3.5%) than dry coffee beans (1.1–2.2% for Arabica, 2.2–2.7% for Robusta). However, because far less tea is used to brew a cup (typically 2-3 grams of leaf vs. 10-15 grams of coffee), a standard 8-ounce cup of brewed coffee ends up containing significantly more caffeine approximately 95-200 mg compared to black tea (40-70 mg) or green tea (20-45 mg).

Yet, the raw number tells only half the story. The caffeine in coffee is biologically “naked,” hitting the bloodstream rapidly, peaking in about 30-60 minutes. This accounts for the sharp, jolting uplift and, sometimes, the equally sharp crash. Tea, however, presents a masterclass in synergy. It is rich in an amino acid unique to the tea plant: L-theanine. L-theanine crosses the blood-brain barrier and promotes the production of alpha brain waves, which are associated with a state of “alert calm.” It modulates the psycho-stimulatory effects of caffeine, smoothing out the jitters and extending the focus into a sustained, meditative energy without the sympathetic nervous system fight-or-flight spike often attributed to coffee. For this reason, tea is often described as providing a “calm attentiveness,” while coffee provides “emergency alertness.”

Nutritional Profiles: Polyphenol Powerhouses

Neither black coffee nor plain tea contributes macronutritionally significant calories, fat, or protein. Their nutritional worth lies in their staggering density of phytonutrients, specifically polyphenols, but they specialize in different classes.

Coffee is the single largest source of dietary antioxidants in the Western diet, not necessarily because it has the highest concentration, but because of the sheer volume consumed. Its primary class of antioxidants are chlorogenic acids (CGAs). During roasting, some CGAs are degraded, but new compounds like melanoidins and phenylindanes are formed. Phenylindanes, particularly abundant in dark roasts, are being studied for their potent neuroprotective effects, specifically their ability to inhibit the clumping of tau and amyloid beta proteins, hallmarks of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Coffee is also a significant source of the vitamin B3 precursor trigonelline, which degrades partially into niacin during roasting. Furthermore, the diterpenes cafestol and kahweol, found in the oily fraction of unfiltered coffee (like French press or espresso), have a paradoxical effect: they can raise serum cholesterol levels, but they also demonstrate chemoprotective properties in the liver and colon, potentially inducing glutathione synthesis. Paper filters remove these oils.

Tea, on the other hand, is dominated by flavonoids, most famously the catechins of green tea. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the star, a molecule studied extensively for its anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, and metabolic-boosting properties. During the oxidation process that turns green leaves into black tea, these simple catechins oxidize and polymerize into the more complex theaflavins and thearubigins. These transformed molecules are equally potent antioxidants, contributing to black tea’s benefits for heart health by improving endothelial function and lowering LDL cholesterol. Tea also provides a meaningful mineral profile, particularly in older leaves; it is one of the few natural dietary sources of the trace element fluoride (beneficial for dental enamel but something to monitor in excessive amounts), as well as manganese, potassium, and zinc.

Geography and Terroir: A Global Footprint

The source of these drinks is a map of global trade and tropical ecosystems.

Coffee is famously finicky, growing in the “Bean Belt” between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Brazil is the titan, producing over a third of the world’s supply, often with notes of chocolate and nuts. Colombia, perched in the Andes, produces smoother, high-acidity Arabicas. Vietnam is the world’s second-largest producer but focuses almost exclusively on the robust, high-caffeine, bitter Robusta bean, which fuels instant coffee and espresso blends. Ethiopia, the genetic motherland of Arabica, offers wildly diverse heirloom varietals with floral, citrus, or wine-like profiles. The high-altitude volcanic soils of Costa Rica and Kenya produce beans with intense, often fruity, acidity.

Tea is overwhelmingly dominated by Asia. China is the birthplace, producing every category imaginable from the delicate dragon well (Longjing) green teas of Hangzhou to the aged pu-erh cakes of Yunnan. India is the heavyweight of the black tea world, with the floodplains of Assam producing malty, bold leaves and the high elevations of Darjeeling yielding a muscatel, champagne-like complexity. Japan specializes exclusively in green tea, with meticulous shading techniques in regions like Uji and Shizuoka that force the leaves to pump out chlorophyll and L-theanine, creating the umami-bomb that is Matcha and Gyokuro. Outside of Asia, Kenya has become a tea powerhouse, primarily producing CTC (Crush, Tear, Curl) black tea for the mass-market teabag trade, while Sri Lanka (Ceylon) and Taiwan (famed for high-mountain Oolongs) remain critical purveyors of artisanal leaves.

Who Benefits and Who Should Abstain?

Navigating the safety and benefit profile is a matter of physiology, genetics, and life stage.

Coffee offers robust protection for the liver, showing dose-dependent reductions in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Its high chlorogenic acid and caffeine punch makes it a superior ergogenic aid for high-intensity athletic performance. The neuroprotection offered by phenylindanes is a profound benefit for aging populations looking to preserve cognitive function. However, the caffeine load is a double-edged sword. Slow metabolizers those with a specific CYP1A2 gene variant have a significantly increased risk of hypertension and myocardial infarction with heavy coffee intake. Pregnant individuals are advised to cap caffeine intake strictly due to the fetus’s inability to metabolize it. Those with anxiety disorders, GERD, or uncontrolled hypertension often find coffee’s sympathetic nervous system activation exacerbates their conditions.

Tea is the gentler, long-game guardian of the cardiovascular system. The EGCG in green tea is a mild thermogenic, which, when paired with caffeine, may modestly aid in weight management by increasing energy expenditure. The L-theanine synergy makes green tea a promising nootropic adjunct for managing ADHD-like symptoms or for those seeking focused calm without sedation. Black tea has a demonstrable ability to lower the stress hormone cortisol and promote a faster recovery from stressful events. The safety profile for tea is broader; it contains less caffeine per cup, and L-theanine mitigates blood pressure spikes. The primary caution is the iron-absorption inhibitor: the tannins in tea bind to non-heme iron from plant sources, potentially exacerbating iron-deficiency anemia if consumed directly with meals. Matcha, being the whole ingested leaf rather than an infusion, concentrates all these benefits and any heavy metals from the soil, such as lead, making sourcing critical.

In the grand calculus of health, the duel is a false dichotomy. Coffee is the powerful, targeted intervention a neuroprotective, bronchial-opening sprint. Tea is the holistic, adaptive tonic a cardiovascular and psychological marathon. The ritual of one does not negate the other. Many find that the morning constitution demands the chemical solitude of a dark roast, while the afternoon requires the meditative, sustained focus of an oolong. They are, in the end, two distinct tinctures drawn from the same earth, each offering a different conversation with the human body.

#Coffee #Tea #Nutrition #Health

Non Partisan Election News

 

Non Partisan Election News

powered by Surfing Waves

How Can I Best Leave an Abusive Marriage and What Should I Do?

   

Legal

How Can I Best Leave an Abusive Marriage and What Should I Do?

 JUL 02, 2020

Did you know that every minute, 20 people are physically abused by their intimate partners? That totals to more than 10 million people in just one year.

And the worst part? That statistic doesn’t even cover psychological or emotional abuse which is even more common than physical abuse. Are you in an abusive marriage?

If you said no, are you sure? Spotting psychological and emotional abuse can be more difficult than identifying physical abuse, but we can help you find the differences and guide you to help.

Signs of Abuse

For those in a toxic relationship, identifying the specific type(s) of abuse can seem daunting. A good place to start is looking for broad and general signs of abuse.

This can include traits of possessiveness and jealousy as well as verbal signs like threats and put-downs. The tell-tale sign of an abusive relationship is, of course, physical and/or sexual violence.

With people now exploring their sexuality more than ever, it can be difficult to decipher whether your partner is exploring a fantasy, or they’re abusing you. During sex and throughout your days, pay attention to their behavior for these toxic traits.

Another sign of abuse is focused on you, the victim. If you find yourself excusing their behavior often or you blame yourself for the way they’re acting all the time, you are likely in an abusive marriage.

In more extreme cases, the victim can experience Stockholm syndrome, which is typically considered as a psychological coping mechanism. If you are experiencing Stockholm syndrome, you are likely to brush off the idea. It helps to see a professional or to reach out to a friend who can help you spot the signs.

Psychological Abuse

Psychological abuse, also known as emotional abuse, is the most difficult to spot as it is very manipulative. If left unchecked, over time the victim will begin to internalize this abuse and they’ll believe it’s true and it’s their fault. Because it’s so elusive and hard to identify, between 50 and 80 percent of adults are at risk of psychological abuse.

Most psychological abuse is used to shame, humiliate, and instill fear into the victim so the abuser can assume power and control. Because the abusers want said control, a good indicator of emotional abuse is the constant knowledge of where you are at all times. This includes tracking you from your phone, controlling where you go, deciding who you hang out with, forcing you to be home at certain times, the list goes on.

Another trick used by psychological abusers is gaslighting.  This form of manipulation makes you wonder if an incident or something else was real or not. You will start to question your own sanity, wondering if maybe your abuser is right and perhaps you had just remembered wrong.

Psychological abuse isn’t just limited to these traits and methods, though. Another common trick that psychological abusers use is emotional neglect.

Essentially, they’ll start to ignore you by not communicating with you, perhaps disappearing with no mention, turning others against you. They’ll even attempt to emotionally isolate you from others to maintain control.

They can do this by assassinating your character which would turn your friends away; they’ll try to come in between you and your family, and much more. Doing all this may seem counterproductive on the abuser’s part, especially if they’re shutting you out, but if you have no one to go to except for them, that’s exactly what they want.

Physical Abuse

Physical abuse is the one most often discussed and portrayed in television and film. Just like with psychological abuse, the main goal of the abuser is to gain power and control over the victim. While the methods utilized by an emotional abuser are subtle and hard to detect, those used by a physical abuser are clear and intimidating.

When discussing how the victim feels, in a psychologically abusive relationship, your feelings are sometimes confusing and you tend to blame yourself, painting your abuser as the “good guy”.

With physical abuse, you’ll still wonder if perhaps you are to blame for their behavior, but you’ll also feel afraid of your partner. You may avoid talking about certain things because you don’t want to make your partner angry, you think that you deserve to be mistreated, and in extreme situations, you may even feel emotionally numb.

Physical abusers use tactics utilized by emotional abusers like belittling and they carry similar traits like possessiveness and jealousy, but what sets them apart is that when those methods fail, they get physical. Physical abusers tend to have a bad temper, they threaten you with harm of all extents, they use you for sex, and they can even threaten suicide if you were to leave them.

Another thing to note is that physical abuse follows a cycle: abuse, guilt, excuses, “normal” behavior, fantasizing, and the set-up. If you think you are a victim of physical abuse or you believe you are in an abusive marriage or relationship, refer to this cycle and look at where you are now and how past incidents have played out.

Physical Abuse

Physical abuse is the one most often discussed and portrayed in television and film. Just like with psychological abuse, the main goal of the abuser is to gain power and control over the victim. While the methods utilized by an emotional abuser are subtle and hard to detect, those used by a physical abuser are clear and intimidating.

When discussing how the victim feels, in a psychologically abusive relationship, your feelings are sometimes confusing and you tend to blame yourself, painting your abuser as the “good guy”.

With physical abuse, you’ll still wonder if perhaps you are to blame for their behavior, but you’ll also feel afraid of your partner. You may avoid talking about certain things because you don’t want to make your partner angry, you think that you deserve to be mistreated, and in extreme situations, you may even feel emotionally numb.

Physical abusers use tactics utilized by emotional abusers like belittling and they carry similar traits like possessiveness and jealousy, but what sets them apart is that when those methods fail, they get physical. Physical abusers tend to have a bad temper, they threaten you with harm of all extents, they use you for sex, and they can even threaten suicide if you were to leave them.

Another thing to note is that physical abuse follows a cycle: abuse, guilt, excuses, “normal” behavior, fantasizing, and the set-up. If you think you are a victim of physical abuse or you believe you are in an abusive marriage or relationship, refer to this cycle and look at where you are now and how past incidents have played out.

Abuse of Men

While definitely not as common as women with male abusers, men can be the victims. In fact, 29% of straight men have been physically abused by their partners. When discussing emotional abuse, nearly 48% of men have been abused.

Because of the toxic masculinity instilled by the patriarchal society we live in, most men don’t feel comfortable discussing their own mental health, substance abuse, and domestic abuse. Not only do they not feel comfortable discussing these things with others, but they don’t want to admit to themselves that these things are happening to them.

For men, spotting the signs of abuse is the same as if you were a woman. While it may be difficult, it’s time to stop being one of the 830,000 men a year that are victims of domestic abuse.

What Should I Do?

If you truly believe you are in an abusive relationship, it’s time to come up with a plan. Are you leaving? Are you filing for divorce or breaking up with them?

Your plan is crucial to your escape. If you live with your abuser, things can get difficult. You’ll want to find a way out of your lease or at least communicate with your landlord or leasing office regarding your current situation.

Whatever your plan may be, you should have a place to go at a moment’s notice. Alerting your family or your friends is a great option for this. If you aren’t ready to tell your family what’s been happening, that is completely valid and understandable, you’ll just want to contact a close friend first.

If you aren’t leaving right away, start documenting everything that happens. This can come in handy should you decide to press charges on your abuser. They’ll also help you know you aren’t insane, you can share them with a therapist, and you can even refer to them should you find yourself in another abusive relationship.

Another tip if you aren’t leaving right away is to have an emergency bag ready to go. Should you need to flee at a moment’s notice, you don’t want to stick around packing while your abuser is agitated. If your abuser is known to tarnish your belongings, you can consider packing items that have significant value to you, however, you should prioritize necessities first.

To avoid an outburst that could be detrimental, hide your emergency bag where you know your abuser won’t find it. Along with your emergency bag, hide a good amount of money so you can support yourself while you stay with your friends or with family.

Reaching out for Help

If you still aren’t sure that you’re in an abusive marriage or relationship, reach out for help. Making a quick call to the National Domestic Violence Hotline can be a big help in determining whether or not you’re a victim.

If you don’t feel comfortable with calling out of fear of your abuser, consider talking to a therapist should you have one. If this isn’t an option, search your area for local help centers and plan a visit without the knowledge of your abuser.

If none of these are options, as we’ve mentioned before, reach out to friends or family. They know you just as much as you know yourself and will be willing to help in any way possible.

Should I Press Charges?

While to an outsider this question may be very straightforward and easy to answer, for a victim, it’s more challenging. Should your plans fail and you end up back with the abuser, them knowing you pressed charges or you were going to could escalate things. Or perhaps you truly believe they’re a good person and you don’t want them to go to jail.

Whatever the reason is, you have the option to call the police or file a criminal complaint. Should you not do so, nothing will likely happen. You can leave the relationship or marriage, not do anything legally, and then be done with it, however, there is always the risk that the abuser can return.

Should you press charges, then you don’t have much of a say when it comes to their court case and if they get jail time. When it comes down to it, the decision is yours.

What About Divorce?

While this question carries many of the same pros and cons of pressing charges, it can be a bit trickier. Should you decide to leave your abusive marriage, your abuser could beg you to stay and say they’ll change.

How do you know this isn’t just another trick? Will they change?

It’s an important decision to make, but should you decide to not believe them and you go through your divorce, if you have kids, you’ll want to assume custody of them. Most states lean into what’s best for the child so if you have proof of abuse, that can go a long way. If you kept a journal as we discussed earlier or you still have bruises or scars, all of that can be evidence of your abuse.

If you’re still on the fence, it’s a good idea to learn more and consider finding an affordable lawyer.

The Road to Recovery

Recovering from an abusive relationship is not an easy journey and it will take time. Exposure to both long-term physical and emotional abuse could result in PTSD and trust issues. Taking your time to recuperate and instill trust in others is important for your recovery.

Because it’s common to blame yourself for the behavior of your abusers, once out of the relationship you could be angry with yourself for not recognizing the abuse earlier. You need to forgive yourself and start building up to loving and trusting yourself again. None of the abuse was your fault and you need to start being comfortable with that.

It’s also helpful to search your area for local support groups. Many can likely be found at the local help centers we referred to earlier. Speaking anonymously with other domestic abuse survivors can be a big help not only to you but to others as well.

Moving on From Your Abusive Marriage

Recovering from an abusive marriage or relationship takes time, but eventually, you’ll reach the point in your life where it’s time to move on. It’s important to keep hold of the lessons you learned and the knowledge you’ve gained, but your abuser doesn’t deserve any more power over you. It’s time to leave them behind.

If you found this article helpful in any way or you think it may benefit someone you know, be sure to share it with them. If you would like to read more content like this, go ahead and check out the rest of our blog. And remember, you are not alone.

#crime #domesticviolence #abuse #abusiverelationshp

   

My Patriot Supply 

Mike Lurk

Camping Survival Gear: Creating A Wildcrafting Survival Cooking Toolkit

Hobbies Articles | April 30, 2012

Learn about basic wildcrafting tools to place in your survival gear when adventure camping with the intent for survival cooking, plant collection and storage.

Wildcrafting is something that survival enthusiasts do. Simply put, wildcrafting is the collection or gathering of plants that you did not personally plant. However, it is very important to be prepared with a wildcrafting survival cooking toolkit as some plants can be dangerous when consumed.

Tools For Harvesting Your Survival Cooking Plants

There are some basic tools that every wild-crafter needs in their survival gear. First and foremost is a good survival gear bag to hold everything. Then you need a plant field guide that you can use for identifying plants. You also want to pack a survival knife or two. Your survival gear should also include a pot you can heat over a fire, a source of fire such as matches or a lighter, and a source of water. Many wild crafted herbs and plants can be boiled to create broths or soups that can sustain your nutritional needs while camping. In addition, you want to have some sort of container (plastic bags, vials, or waterproof boxes) to store the gathered plants in. If you have the need of grinding plants for medicinal purposes you can always pick up a set of stones from your surroundings to supplement your survival gear.

Choosing A Survival Knife And Other Cutting Tools

For survival cooking, a basic multi-tool kit like a Swiss Army Knife is a good idea. However, for true wild-crafting success you will also want to include additional survival knife options. A Entrek Knife is a great soil knife, which is also sometimes called a grubber and it takes up little space in your pack. Some suggestions for your survival gear kit include a pruner and a holster. A lopping shear in an anvil style are also good for cutting roots and branches for your survival cooking, but you need to consider size and how much gear you want to carry when adding this tool to your kit.

Additional Survival Gear For Your Survival Cooking Toolkit

If you're serious about supplementing your diet with wild crafting while you are camping, you definitely want to include a digging or spading fork to help loosen soil around compacted plants. In addition to your main survival gear pack you may also want to consider including a decent stash of burlap bags. While you can buy these outright, you can also find burlap bags that are useful wild crafting tools by recycling your rice, peanut, chili, or coffee bags as these items are often transported in burlap. Other containers you will want to have on hand are plastic bags, paper bags, and glass or plastic containers which have seal tight lids. These items can prolong the survival of your collected plants and herbs until you make camp, especially if you are going to be camping for several days. Plastic storage containers are more practical than glass due to breakage and are also good for storing extra broth or medicinal preparations you've created in the field. These items along with a quality survival knifeshould create a basic Wild crafting survival cooking kit you can build on

Source: Free Articles from ArticlesFactory.com

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

I have been a Hunting Knife enthusiast for years and have brought my passion to create a webstore that offers quality hunting knives and tools for hunters in the USA.

Your Hunting Knife Specialist

Mike Lurk

http://www.steelhuntingknives.com/

#survival #prepping #camping #outdoors

For those of you upset about Trump's $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund:

 

For those of you upset about Trump's $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund:

Kamala Harris bailed out rioters in Minneapolis  during the George Floyd Riots that lasted 3 months. January 6 was only 3 hours. Hardly anyone was arrested during the George Floyd Riots. Over 300 people were killed. Hundreds of Cops were injured. A retired Cop was Killed. Several Cops were blinded by lasers aimed at their eyes. 100 BLACK OWNED BUSINESSES were burned Down in Minneapolis alone. I saw 9 LA Police vehicles torched on a Saturday during the George Floyd Riots. 

No Cops died on J6 no matter what they tell you. The only person that died was a 5'2 120lb 14 year Air Force Veteran (Ashli Babbit) who was just there.

The Cop they say died from being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher was a lie. He died 5 day later from a stroke. Autopsy proved it. The other 4 Cops died or suicide months and years later. Yet Biden and Democrats always said 5 people died on J6. They ignore Ashli Babbit shot in the neck by a bad cop. Also, people who were simply there were locked up in Solitary confinement for years with no Lawyer. 

That is why he created the fund. One guy had his business shut down because the Biden Administration's war on people creating supplements to fight Covid...and the product was approved. Then they came back and charged him criminally for the same thing after the civil mess.

I hope they ALL get paid. Look what they tried to do to Joe Rogan just for saying there were alternatives to the SHOT. They [LEFT] tried to destroy him. And he was a BERNIE SANDERS supporter!!! The LEFT eats their own if you step out of line.

#Trump #$1776billionAntiWeaponizationFund #J6 #January6 #SummerofLove #KamalaHarris #Biden

Trump’s $1.776 Billion Anti-Weaponization Fund Is the Justice Americans Deserve

If you want to understand why Donald Trump felt compelled to create a $1.776 billion fund to defend Americans targeted by a weaponized legal and bureaucratic system, look no further than the two Americas that have emerged over the past four years. On the one hand, you have the rioters who torched cities, assaulted police officers, and destroyed black-owned businesses during the 2020 “Summer of Love” and were literally bailed out by Kamala Harris. On the other, you have the January 6 protesters, many of whom walked peacefully into the Capitol and have since been locked in solitary confinement, denied counsel, and crushed under the weight of a vindictive Justice Department. The contrast could not be starker, and it is precisely this double standard that Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund seeks to remedy.

While the corporate media and the Democratic establishment have spent years constructing a narrative that January 6 was the greatest threat to democracy since the Civil War, they have conveniently memory-holed the months of violent unrest that swept American cities in 2020. From late May through August, the George Floyd riots left a trail of devastation that makes January 6 look like a minor scuffle yet the response from the left was not condemnation, but celebration.

More than 300 people lost their lives during the nationwide riots. Let that number sink in. Over 300 deaths, not over a contested election or a political speech, but in a wave of destruction that progressive leaders called “mostly peaceful.” Hundreds of police officers were injured. A retired St. Louis police captain, David Dorn, was murdered on video while trying to protect a friend’s pawn shop from looters. Numerous cops were permanently blinded by rioters aiming high-powered lasers at their eyes. In Minneapolis alone, 100 black-owned businesses were burned to the ground a statistic that should have horrified anyone who claims to care about racial equity. Yet on a single Saturday in Los Angeles, I watched nine police vehicles engulfed in flames, and the reaction from Democrats and the press was a collective shrug.

And who was there to support the people arrested during this orgy of violence? None other than then-Senator Kamala Harris, who used her platform to encourage donations to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, a group that posted bail for rioters. “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota,” Harris tweeted. The fund freed from jail individuals charged with crimes ranging from looting to assault and at least one beneficiary went on to commit murder after being bailed out. That is not hyperbole; it is a documented fact that the left would rather you forget.

Even those rioters who faced charges were largely given soft plea deals, probation, or had their cases dismissed entirely. The message was unmistakable: if your cause is sanctified by the left, the law is a mere suggestion. The “Summer of Love” was, in reality, a summer of sanctioned violence, and Kamala Harris was the den mother of the movement.

Now compare this to January 6. The Capitol breach lasted approximately three hours. No police officer was killed that day. The only person who died on the scene was Ashli Babbitt, a 5-foot-2, 120-pound Air Force veteran who served her country for 14 years. She was unarmed, posed no lethal threat, and was shot in the neck by a police officer who has never been held accountable. Democrats and the media have made a saint of George Floyd, yet they dismiss Babbitt’s death as a footnote, or worse, imply she deserved it.

You have been told repeatedly that a Capitol Police officer, Brian Sicknick, was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher by a pro-Trump mob. That was a lie, and the autopsy proves it. Sicknick died the following day from two strokes. The medical examiner found no evidence of blunt-force trauma or an allergic reaction to chemical irritants. His death was a tragedy, but it was not a homicide committed by a rioter a fact the Washington D.C. medical examiner confirmed, and which the media quietly buried after pushing the fire extinguisher fable for months. The other four officers cited among the “five deaths” on January 6 died by suicide weeks or even months later, which, while heartbreaking, cannot be laid at the feet of a three-hour protest.

Yet the Biden administration and its allies in the press continue to insist that five people “died as a result of” January 6, neatly erasing Ashli Babbitt and inflating a narrative of deadly insurrection. This calculated dishonesty has served as the justification for one of the most sweeping persecutions of political dissenters in American history.

The treatment of January 6 defendants is a national disgrace. People who merely walked through open doors were rounded up, thrown into solitary confinement, held for years without trial, and denied access to lawyers. Some were hit with charges like “parading” and still spent months in isolation a punishment so severe that the United Nations has condemned it as cruel and inhumane. Meanwhile, parents who dared to speak out at school board meetings were investigated by the FBI, Catholics who attended traditional Latin Mass were flagged as potential extremists, and one small-business owner who marketed a legally approved supplement to help people fight COVID saw his company destroyed by the Biden administration in a civil case, only to be criminally charged later for the same product. This is the very definition of weaponized government.

And then there is the case of Joe Rogan. Here is a man who supported Bernie Sanders in 2020, whose politics lean libertarian-left, and who simply had conversations on his podcast about alternatives to the COVID shot. For that sin, the left tried to destroy him. They smeared him as a dangerous conspiracy theorist, pressured Spotify to censor him, and deployed the full machinery of the medical-industrial complex to discredit any discussion of early treatments or natural immunity. If they can do that to a wildly popular multimillionaire with an enormous platform, what chance does the average American have? The left eats its own the moment they step out of line, and the lesson for the rest of us is clear: fall in line or be crushed.

This is the context in which Trump’s $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund was announced. The dollar figure is deliberately evocative, tying the initiative to the spirit of 1776 and the founding principles of liberty and resistance against tyranny. It is not taxpayer money; it is a fund that will draw on private donations and targeted legal resources to defend Americans who find themselves in the crosshairs of a politicized justice system. The fund will support legal fees, expose prosecutorial overreach, and help rebuild the lives of those who have been bankrupted and imprisoned simply because they hold the wrong political views.

To the left, the very existence of such a fund is an outrage because it threatens their monopoly on moral authority. They want you to believe that bailing out BLM rioters was an act of charity, but that providing a lawyer to a grandmother who walked through the Capitol is an act of sedition. They scream about threats to democracy while a Democratic president’s DOJ targets his chief political opponent with lawfare. The fund is a direct challenge to that hypocrisy.

Conservatives understand what is at stake. A government that can destroy the life of a janitor who took a selfie in the Capitol can destroy yours. A state that can shut down a supplement company because it offended federal health bureaucrats can shut down your business. A media-corporate apparatus that tries to cancel Joe Rogan will not hesitate to cancel you. The Anti-Weaponization Fund is not about Donald Trump; it is about the principle that no American should be ruined because the powers that be have decided they are an enemy of the regime.

The fund’s detractors will call it a political stunt, but ask yourself: when was the last time a major political figure put real money $1.776 billion — behind a systematic effort to defend ordinary citizens from government abuse? The Biden administration’s answer to political dissent has been to label concerned parents domestic terrorists, to create a Disinformation Governance Board, and to sic the FBI on traditionalist Catholics. Trump’s answer is to give those victims the best legal representation money can buy and to shine a blazing light on the injustices they suffer.

The Ashli Babbitts of the world deserve justice. The nonviolent J6 defendants rotting in solitary deserve their day in court with competent counsel. The small-business owner bankrupted by a two-faced regulatory assault deserves restitution. And the police officers permanently disabled by the rioters whom Kamala Harris helped spring from jail deserve to see a system that treats their attackers with the same ruthless severity it reserves for political conservatives.

You do not have to like Donald Trump’s style to recognize that the Anti-Weaponization Fund addresses a deep and dangerous rot in American governance. When a retired cop can be murdered by looters and the vice president effectively cheers on the mob, while an unarmed veteran is shot dead by a government agent and the White House ignores her name, the scales of justice are broken. Trump’s fund is an attempt to rebalance them. I hope every targeted American gets paid, and more importantly, I hope the nation wakes up to the two-tiered system before it is too late.