.png)
OPINION
Abortion, ILLEGALS, and The US Population
The Democratic Party wants Abortion on demand paid for by the Government. They want the ILLEGALS because they say the US birthrate is declining so we need them to boost population. NO WE DON'T! STOP KILLING BABIES!
BTW, 65% of Abortions are now done at home with a pill - that has an 11% complication rate. They say that rate is higher than FDA standards.
If I gave a Woman a drug and it ended up killing her baby I would be on the wrong side of a news story.
.png)
The Great Contradiction: Abortion, Open Borders, and the Liberal War on the Future
A recent, impassioned social post cuts to the heart of what many conservatives see as the defining, and devastating, contradiction of modern progressive policy. It lays out two seemingly disparate agendas of the Democratic Party: the fervent promotion of abortion-on-demand, often publicly funded, and the advocacy for mass, illegal immigration to “boost population.” To the conservative eye, these are not separate issues. They are two sides of the same degraded coin—a cynical and short-sighted strategy that sacrifices both the nation’s native future and its sovereign integrity on the altar of political power.
The post’s core argument is a moral and mathematical rebuke: “STOP KILLING BABIES!” followed by the insistence that we do not need to import people to solve a population decline we are actively, intentionally engineering. This is not merely a pro-life stance; it is a profound accusation of cultural and national suicide. Why, conservatives ask, must we tear down border walls while funding the termination of potential future citizens within them? The answer, from this perspective, is raw political calculus. A declining native birthrate, exacerbated by a culture that often devalues family formation, creates a demographic vacuum. The progressive solution is not to promote the conditions for stable families, motherhood, and child-rearing—which would align with traditional, often religious, values they oppose—but to fill the void with a new electorate. This new population, the theory goes, is more likely to depend on the very government programs that Democrats expand, thereby creating a permanent political clientele. It is the replacement of cradle-to-grave citizens with transactional migrants and a state-managed demographic plan.
The post then pivots to a critical and underreported facet of the abortion debate: the rise of the chemical abortion pill, now accounting for a majority of abortions. The cited 11% complication rate—a figure supported by studies like the 2021 *Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health* analysis which found significant rates of emergency room visits post-medication abortion—is a damning indictment of the “safe and easy” narrative. For conservatives, this is the ultimate expression of progressive hypocrisy. The same political movement that demands “equity” in healthcare and screams “follow the science!” on other issues aggressively downplays the very real physical and psychological dangers of DIY abortions. They have fought to eliminate even basic safety standards, like requiring an in-person physician visit, all under the banner of “access.” The result, as the post starkly notes, is a dangerous double standard. If a citizen gave a woman a drug that ended her pregnancy, it would be a national scandal, potentially prosecuted as a crime. Yet, when a corporation mails the same drug, funded by political allies and championed by the media, it is framed as “healthcare” and “empowerment.” Where is the equity for the women rushed to the ER with hemorrhaging or incomplete abortions? Where is the scientific rigor in ignoring complication data?
This medicalization of abortion, stripping it of clinical oversight, is seen not as progress, but as a descent into barbarism disguised as convenience. It transforms a profound moral and physical event into a transactional ordeal to be managed alone, in a bathroom, with the state and corporations absolved of all responsibility for the outcome. The conservative view holds that this is the opposite of compassion; it is abandonment. True care for women would involve robust support for crisis pregnancies, adoption reform, and policies that empower women to choose life without facing financial ruin—not mailing them pills and telling them to deal with it.
Ultimately, this post points to a broader conservative critique of the liberal worldview: its fundamental hostility to the foundational pillars of a healthy, enduring society. The traditional conservative vision values the nuclear family as the essential cell of national life. It sees children not as a burden or a choice, but as a blessing and a societal necessity—the very future of the nation, its culture, and its values. The policies of abortion-on-demand and the degradation of borders represent a direct assault on this vision.
Abortion destroys the native future. Open borders import a replacement population without demanding assimilation to the language, law, and shared history that have made America exceptional. Together, they create a rootless, transient society—one without deep familial bonds or national loyalty, perfectly suited for management by an ever-expanding administrative state. The citizen is replaced by the client; the patriot by the recipient.
The conservative answer, therefore, is not to manage the decline but to reverse it. It calls for a restoration of a culture of life, where every child is welcomed, protected by law, and seen as a bearer of inherent potential. It demands an immigration policy that is legal, orderly, and merit-based, one that admits newcomers who wish to become Americans, not just access its economy. It seeks to rebuild the economic and social conditions—from marriage-friendly tax codes to protections for religious liberty—that allow families to flourish.
The post’s raw emotion—its focus on the “baby,” the “ILLEGALS,” and the deadly complications—cuts through the sanitized euphemisms of modern politics. It rejects the language of “terminating a pregnancy” and “undocumented immigrants” in favor of terms that speak to moral and legal truth. In doing so, it voices a deep-seated fear that the nation is being dismantled from within and without: from within by a death cult of convenience that sacrifices its young, and from without by an invasion enabled by political elites.
The path forward, from this perspective, is clear. We must choose life. We must choose law. We must choose a future built on our own children, raised in strong families, educated in our history, and committed to the perpetuation of a sovereign, virtuous republic. The alternative is a barren nation, both morally and demographically, adrift in a world it no longer has the confidence or the people to lead. The Democratic blueprint is one of managed decline and political dependency. The conservative imperative is one of national renewal.
.jpg)