'Socialism is a snake eating it's tail and then bragging about his hunting skills.'
Of all the metaphors used to describe the failings of socialism, few are as vividly apt as the recent quip that has been circulating: “Socialism is a snake eating its tail and then bragging about his hunting skills.” This deceptively simple image captures the entire tragic cycle of this ideology—its self-cannibalizing nature, its perpetual state of crisis, and its unshakable hubris in claiming these very failures as victories. From a conservative perspective, this is not merely a witty remark but a profound summary of a century of economic and human disaster.
The first part of the metaphor, “a snake eating its tail,” perfectly illustrates the fundamental economic contradiction at socialism’s core. A system that purports to be about production and prosperity is, in reality, a machine for consumption and eventual collapse. The snake, or Ouroboros of ancient symbology, represents a cycle of self-destruction, and this is precisely what socialist policy enacts upon a nation’s economy.
Socialism operates by seizing the engines of production—through nationalization, punitive taxation, and suffocating regulation. It attacks the very “tails” of private enterprise and individual capital that generate the wealth it seeks to redistribute. The entrepreneur who risks his savings to open a factory is told his profits are illegitimate. The doctor who spends decades in education and training is told her high income is a social ill. The family that has scrimped and saved to build a nest egg is told their capital must be “put to better use” by the state. This is the snake taking its first bite.
The immediate consequence is a short-lived illusion of bounty. The state, having confiscated private wealth, can fund massive social programs, distribute benefits, and create a temporary sense of communal prosperity. This is the snake swallowing, feeling sated. But the digestive process is where the doom lies. By punishing success and confiscating capital, socialism annihilates the incentive to produce. Why innovate if your patents will be seized? Why expand a business if the profits are taxed at 90%? Why study for a demanding career if the financial reward is stripped away?
The result is economic stagnation. The pool of wealth that the state is feasting upon begins to shrink. Investment dries up, innovation flees to freer shores, and the productive class is hollowed out. The state, now facing a revenue crisis but burdened with unsustainable entitlement promises, is forced to seek new “tails” to consume. It raises taxes further, prints money to cover its debts, or expropriates what little private property remains. This is the snake, having consumed its tail to the midpoint, now turning on its own body, devouring its torso in a desperate bid to survive. It creates a vicious cycle where the solution to every government-created problem is more government, and the cure for every economic ailment caused by socialism is a stronger dose of socialism. The system literally consumes the foundations of its own existence, leaving behind the economic and social equivalent of a hollow circle.
Yet, the metaphor’s brilliance does not end with the act of self-cannibalization. It is the second clause—“and then bragging about his hunting skills”—that captures the indispensable political and psychological component of socialism. For the system to persist despite its evident failures, it must not only destroy the economy but also control the narrative. It must reframe collapse as progress and desperation as virtue.
This “bragging” manifests in several key ways. First, there is the perpetual blame-shifting. When shelves go empty in Venezuela, when lights go out in South Africa, or when inflation skyrockets in woke capitalist nations flirting with socialist policies, the cause is never the system itself. It is always “sabotage” by the wealthy, “foreign interference” by the United States, the lingering “legacy of colonialism,” or the latest crisis—be it a pandemic or a war—that is wielded as an all-purpose excuse for systemic failure. The snake, having nearly consumed itself, points to the shrinking world around it and declares, “See how I have subdued my enemies?”
Second, socialism brags by redefining dependency as liberation. A citizenry made wholly reliant on the state for housing, food, and healthcare is not seen as a tragic loss of autonomy but as a triumph of “guaranteed rights.” The ability to stand on your own two feet, to provide for your family through your own labor, is recast as a precarious and exploitative condition. True freedom, they claim, is freedom *from* the burden of responsibility. The snake, now immobile and consuming its own neck, boasts that it has finally achieved a perfect, self-contained equilibrium, free from the messy struggles of the hunt.
This bravado is most evident in the modern Western left, which has learned to repackage the old, failed ideas of socialism in the language of social justice. They point to the very crises they create—the soaring cost of living driven by green energy mandates, the collapse of urban centers under the weight of bureaucratic bloat, the breakdown of social trust through identity politics—and present themselves as the only ones with the solution. They create a problem, offer a “fix” that expands their own power and further impoverishes the people, and then present themselves as heroic saviors. The snake has now eaten its own head, and its last dying signal is a boast about its magnificent hunting prowess.
The conservative alternative to this suicidal cycle is not a heartless, dog-eat-dog world. It is the philosophy of the cultivator, not the consumer. It is the belief in building, growing, and stewarding. Conservatism understands that a society’s wealth is not a static pie to be divided, but a dynamic, living entity that must be nurtured. It is the fruit of a thousand invisible actions: the farmer tending his fields, the small business owner balancing her books at midnight, the parent saving for a child’s education, the scientist toiling in a lab.
Our role, as conservatives, is to protect the garden from the snake. This means upholding the principles that allow prosperity to flourish: the rule of law, which protects property rights and ensures contracts are honored; limited government, which gets out of the way of innovation and industry; and a culture that celebrates merit, hard work, and personal responsibility. It means understanding that true compassion is not measured by the size of a welfare check, but by the number of people lifted out of poverty through opportunity and the dignity of work.
The snake eating its tail is an ancient symbol of infinity, but in the context of human society, it represents a finite and fatal path. Socialism’s promise of a utopian end-state is a mirage; the only destination on its track is the point of consumption, where the head finally meets the tail and the entire entity vanishes. The conservative vision, by contrast, is one of a lasting and open-ended prosperity, built not on the envy of what others have, but on the boundless potential of what free men and women can create. The task before us is to clearly and consistently articulate this choice: between the self-congratulatory death spiral of the snake, and the enduring, generative work of the cultivator.
#Socialism #SnakeEatingItsTail #Mamdani